Protests on college campuses

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hatred toward these students is deranged on this thread. So many of you trapped in propaganda hell and frothing at the mouth.

Why do you get off so much on being angry and hateful?

The protesters aren’t victims. They are depriving other students on an in person education and in some campuses, a graduation.

The universities are aiding and abbeting war crimes, depriving thousands of life and millions of livelihood.

Then the “students” should get an education elsewhere at a university whose values they support. They are free to leave. They aren’t free to occupy private property to make “demands” the university doesn’t agree with.

The University does not belong to a handful of the power class who weaponize their wealth and influence, nor to a handful of beaurocrats or political operatives. It belongs to the students and faculty. They have voted.

On what planet?

A university definitely does NOT belong to students or faculty. They are temporary, transient and eminently replaceable customers and employees, respectively.

On a planet where the will of the many does not need to bow the knee to the interest of the few. It used to be called a Democracy.

Professors and students are not temporary customers and employees, they are the PRODUCT and the FINANCERS. Universities can function perfectly fine without the involvement of donors, piliticians or the military.

1. Since when does the "product" OWN an entity?

2 Customers do not equal "financers".

You have your capitalism exactly backwards. Ivy grad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hatred toward these students is deranged on this thread. So many of you trapped in propaganda hell and frothing at the mouth.

Why do you get off so much on being angry and hateful?

The protesters aren’t victims. They are depriving other students on an in person education and in some campuses, a graduation.

The universities are aiding and abbeting war crimes, depriving thousands of life and millions of livelihood.

Then the “students” should get an education elsewhere at a university whose values they support. They are free to leave. They aren’t free to occupy private property to make “demands” the university doesn’t agree with.

The University does not belong to a handful of the power class who weaponize their wealth and influence, nor to a handful of beaurocrats or political operatives. It belongs to the students and faculty. They have voted.

On what planet?

A university definitely does NOT belong to students or faculty. They are temporary, transient and eminently replaceable customers and employees, respectively.

On a planet where the will of the many does not need to bow the knee to the interest of the few. It used to be called a Democracy.

Professors and students are not temporary customers and employees, they are the PRODUCT and the FINANCERS. Universities can function perfectly fine without the involvement of donors, piliticians or the military.

They are interested parties, but they are not owners of the private university. Current professors and students are interested parties, but so are the donors and the alumni and the board of directors. The problem with the protesters isn’t that the university isn’t listening, it’s that their views aren’t the only ones at stake here, and many simply DISAGREE.

[Anonymous]

I love this picture so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When will the groups organizing this hate be removed from campus? Hillel, Jews for Israel, etc must be banned from campus as a hate group.

Gawd. You have to try MUCH harder. Much, much harder. Or bring in a substitute.

Cut them some slack, new employee on Israeli troll farm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are these protesters always so unattractive?

And the women are all short and fat. No wonder the men don’t let them show their faces.

Do you really want to start critiquing physical features?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hatred toward these students is deranged on this thread. So many of you trapped in propaganda hell and frothing at the mouth.

Why do you get off so much on being angry and hateful?

The protesters aren’t victims. They are depriving other students on an in person education and in some campuses, a graduation.

The universities are aiding and abbeting war crimes, depriving thousands of life and millions of livelihood.

Then the “students” should get an education elsewhere at a university whose values they support. They are free to leave. They aren’t free to occupy private property to make “demands” the university doesn’t agree with.

The University does not belong to a handful of the power class who weaponize their wealth and influence, nor to a handful of beaurocrats or political operatives. It belongs to the students and faculty. They have voted.

On what planet?

A university definitely does NOT belong to students or faculty. They are temporary, transient and eminently replaceable customers and employees, respectively.

On a planet where the will of the many does not need to bow the knee to the interest of the few. It used to be called a Democracy.

Professors and students are not temporary customers and employees, they are the PRODUCT and the FINANCERS. Universities can function perfectly fine without the involvement of donors, piliticians or the military.

Great! So you agree that universities need to get rid of the nutbag protestors so that “the many” can get back to class.

[Anonymous]

If students don't like where the university is investing the university's money, the student can leave and transfer to another school. Why does the university have to divest. There are plenty of students pining to get into Columbia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hatred toward these students is deranged on this thread. So many of you trapped in propaganda hell and frothing at the mouth.

Why do you get off so much on being angry and hateful?

The protesters aren’t victims. They are depriving other students on an in person education and in some campuses, a graduation.

+1 agree!

Disagree. Universities are terrorizing the majority of students for the benefit of Jewish students. Watching the video of protesters getting attacked by pro Israeli thugs while the universities cheer them on is depriving students an education. How many time must we see that Israel flag on display. It is a symbol of oppression and genocide similar to the confederate flag or swastika.

Only the American flag and the state flag belong on a college campus. Follow the rules and attend classes or go home to protest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If all these solitary encampments want their particular university to divest in companies that support Israel, do they even know what that means? Do they have a list of those companies in which their school has invested/in their endowment?

Can they even get specific?

Nope, because they are idiots. Per WSJ, divesting is meaningless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are these protesters always so unattractive?

And the women are all short and fat. No wonder the men don’t let them show their faces.

Do you really want to start critiquing physical features?

The protesters brought it on themselves with their shameless attention seeking behavior, so criticizing them is fair game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hatred toward these students is deranged on this thread. So many of you trapped in propaganda hell and frothing at the mouth.

Why do you get off so much on being angry and hateful?

The protesters aren’t victims. They are depriving other students on an in person education and in some campuses, a graduation.

The universities are aiding and abbeting war crimes, depriving thousands of life and millions of livelihood.

Then the “students” should get an education elsewhere at a university whose values they support. They are free to leave. They aren’t free to occupy private property to make “demands” the university doesn’t agree with.

The University does not belong to a handful of the power class who weaponize their wealth and influence, nor to a handful of beaurocrats or political operatives. It belongs to the students and faculty. They have voted.

On what planet?

A university definitely does NOT belong to students or faculty. They are temporary, transient and eminently replaceable customers and employees, respectively.

On a planet where the will of the many does not need to bow the knee to the interest of the few. It used to be called a Democracy.

Professors and students are not temporary customers and employees, they are the PRODUCT and the FINANCERS. Universities can function perfectly fine without the involvement of donors, piliticians or the military.

They are interested parties, but they are not owners of the private university. Current professors and students are interested parties, but so are the donors and the alumni and the board of directors. The problem with the protesters isn’t that the university isn’t listening, it’s that their views aren’t the only ones at stake here, and many simply DISAGREE.

No actually a few, special interests, disagree. We know because there have been votes.

You cannot own a University. You can own a building, you cannot own the human capital that is the product, nor can you own the customer. What we are witnessing is attempts by special interest groups to destroy the essential nature of the product.

[Anonymous]

Folks need to keep in mind that the protestors are an incredibly small percentage of students.

I hate that these schools are getting painted with broad brushstrokes by a hyperventilating media desperate for content. At UCLA it was literally like 200 protestors - some of whom don't even attend the school - out of a student body of 30,000.

Insane that these clowns are getting so much attention, but the media LOVES this type of content that sucks all the oxygen out of the room.

[Anonymous]

80% of those arrested at Arizona State are NOT students.

This whole thing has been co-opted by professional rioters, foreign influences etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Folks need to keep in mind that the protestors are an incredibly small percentage of students.

I hate that these schools are getting painted with broad brushstrokes by a hyperventilating media desperate for content. At UCLA it was literally like 200 protestors - some of whom don't even attend the school - out of a student body of 30,000.

Insane that these clowns are getting so much attention, but the media LOVES this type of content that sucks all the oxygen out of the room.

Great point, and all sides love it.

Protesters benefit from the disproportionate attention.

Anti-protesters have something to get lathered up about.

Media, platforms and influencers get clicks.

The rage machine churns on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:80% of those arrested at Arizona State are NOT students.

This whole thing has been co-opted by professional rioters, foreign influences etc.

Why are they not asking for student ID? College administrations are allowing those messes.