Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

+1

or a person who had the interest of the country as his objective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

"betrayal, abuse of power, national security"

Code section, please?

Hint: No code violation is necessary for impeachment. That’s not what impeachment is about. Maybe read the Constitution? And some history?

[Anonymous]

18 USC 2383
"Whoever incites... any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

"betrayal, abuse of power, national security"

Code section, please?

Hint: No code violation is necessary for impeachment. That’s not what impeachment is about. Maybe read the Constitution? And some history?

I said that impeachment is warranted. I also asked which section of the United States Code was allegedly violated. If you can’t answer, fine—if you don’t know, just say that. No need to reply with third rate snark attempt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

This is a running tally, by week: https://theweeklylist.org/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

"betrayal, abuse of power, national security"

Code section, please?

Hint: No code violation is necessary for impeachment. That’s not what impeachment is about. Maybe read the Constitution? And some history?

I said that impeachment is warranted. I also asked which section of the United States Code was allegedly violated. If you can’t answer, fine—if you don’t know, just say that. No need to reply with third rate snark attempt.

One need not violate a code to be impeached.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

"betrayal, abuse of power, national security"

Code section, please?

Hint: No code violation is necessary for impeachment. That’s not what impeachment is about. Maybe read the Constitution? And some history?

I said that impeachment is warranted. I also asked which section of the United States Code was allegedly violated. If you can’t answer, fine—if you don’t know, just say that. No need to reply with third rate snark attempt.

One need not violate a code to be impeached.

Well aware of that. But as a separate matter, what criminal statute was violated here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

This is a running tally, by week: https://theweeklylist.org/

Your link does not say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

This is a running tally, by week: https://theweeklylist.org/

Your link does not say.

Click on any of the weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

"betrayal, abuse of power, national security"

Code section, please?

Hint: No code violation is necessary for impeachment. That’s not what impeachment is about. Maybe read the Constitution? And some history?

I said that impeachment is warranted. I also asked which section of the United States Code was allegedly violated. If you can’t answer, fine—if you don’t know, just say that. No need to reply with third rate snark attempt.

No criminal violation is required. The DOJ says a president can’t be charged anyway. The code is irrelevant. That said, you might want to google inchoate offenses like solicitation, misprision, and conspiracy. Trumps up to his neck in those.

[Anonymous]

Understand what Trump's corruption does to our diplomatic institutions and the geopolitical game between Russia and Europe

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/how-the-diplomatic-pros-lost-ukraine-to-trump/2019/09/29/0d22be6c-e12e-11e9-8dc8-498eabc129a0_story.html

[Anonymous]

Do we know why Barr, Pompeo, Bannon, Ivanka etc were all in Rome last week?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do we know why Barr, Pompeo, Bannon, Ivanka etc were all in Rome last week?

Pompeo is going this week for a conference, but the question still stands for the balance of them. It cannot be a coincidence. Particularly with the various Oligarchs who happened to be there as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we know why Barr, Pompeo, Bannon, Ivanka etc were all in Rome last week?

Pompeo is going this week for a conference, but the question still stands for the balance of them. It cannot be a coincidence. Particularly with the various Oligarchs who happened to be there as well.

Maybe Trump will want Bannon back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we know why Barr, Pompeo, Bannon, Ivanka etc were all in Rome last week?

Pompeo is going this week for a conference, but the question still stands for the balance of them. It cannot be a coincidence. Particularly with the various Oligarchs who happened to be there as well.

That was such a last minute decision that Pompeo is still scheduled to meet with Trump this afternoon.

I cannot imagine why Pompeo would want to leave the country this week. /s