Ladies - Is a 2 carat too big?

[Anonymous]

Get one of those Italo white sapphire rings to try it out. I got a 2.5 carat travel ring for about $120 and and it is a little large. My real ring is 1.52 (which I haven't worn much since the pandemic) and it's the right size for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a 1.7 C and mine is probably middle range. I have small hands and a plain platinum band. I have had people tell me to get a halo because my ring is too small for our area.

What kind of a@@hole would say that? You should have responded with “have you considered breast implants? You’re a little small-chested for this area.”

In laws. And we don't live in the burbs.

They said the ring their SON bought wasn’t good enough? Gross.

[Anonymous]

Some of us love big sparkly diamonds and gems. I love them whether I bought them or they were a gift. I have some and wear them. I don’t wear them for others, I wear them for me. I love the optical effect of a diamond and the saturated color of a colored gemstone.

[Anonymous]

I designed my engagement ring from A to Z. A 5ct E color vvs1 cushion cut with zero fluorescence with 4cts of round diamonds in a halo triple shank platinum setting. It’s obnoxious to say the least with blinding sparkle. I’ve been asked 100s of times if it’s real and have even been warned by security officers when traveling that wearing it is not safe. It took me about 5 yrs to get the need for attention out of my system, and now wear a 1ct solitaire cz 95% of the time and keep my giant ring in a safe. Plus I was tired of hearing my mom bitch about how dangerous it is to wear “that doorknob” around. I’ve also stopped wearing my designer watches after being followed into parking lots. I realized it’s not worth setting yourself up as a target just for the need to show off your wealth. But to answer your question, 2cts isn’t too big these days but it really depends on the quality. I’d rather have a great quality 1ct than a crap 2ct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I designed my engagement ring from A to Z. A 5ct E color vvs1 cushion cut with zero fluorescence with 4cts of round diamonds in a halo triple shank platinum setting. It’s obnoxious to say the least with blinding sparkle. I’ve been asked 100s of times if it’s real and have even been warned by security officers when traveling that wearing it is not safe. It took me about 5 yrs to get the need for attention out of my system, and now wear a 1ct solitaire cz 95% of the time and keep my giant ring in a safe. Plus I was tired of hearing my mom bitch about how dangerous it is to wear “that doorknob” around. I’ve also stopped wearing my designer watches after being followed into parking lots. I realized it’s not worth setting yourself up as a target just for the need to show off your wealth. But to answer your question, 2cts isn’t too big these days but it really depends on the quality. I’d rather have a great quality 1ct than a crap 2ct.

Have you thought about making it into a necklace? 5 ct is still fcking huge for a pendant, but talk about a showstopper.

[Anonymous]

All I can say is that of the couples I know that made a really big deal about the ring- as in it HAD to be at least a certain size, certain style, and the woman has always had pretty much the exact ring in her mind since she was an adult— they are now divorced. I’m not totally sure why that is, the women were very cool and people. But they were chased by guys who liked to dazzle and impress and keep up appearances. But didn’t have the character required for a good marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All I can say is that of the couples I know that made a really big deal about the ring- as in it HAD to be at least a certain size, certain style, and the woman has always had pretty much the exact ring in her mind since she was an adult— they are now divorced. I’m not totally sure why that is, the women were very cool and people. But they were chased by guys who liked to dazzle and impress and keep up appearances. But didn’t have the character required for a good marriage.

Said every person who couldn’t afford one..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All I can say is that of the couples I know that made a really big deal about the ring- as in it HAD to be at least a certain size, certain style, and the woman has always had pretty much the exact ring in her mind since she was an adult— they are now divorced. I’m not totally sure why that is, the women were very cool and people. But they were chased by guys who liked to dazzle and impress and keep up appearances. But didn’t have the character required for a good marriage.

Said every person who couldn’t afford one..

Eh. I think there may some truth to it. Was in my case, at least.

[Anonymous]

Everyone will think your DH has a tiny weenie. Nothing wrong with that, but I wouldn’t broadcast it with a ring like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I designed my engagement ring from A to Z. A 5ct E color vvs1 cushion cut with zero fluorescence with 4cts of round diamonds in a halo triple shank platinum setting. It’s obnoxious to say the least with blinding sparkle. I’ve been asked 100s of times if it’s real and have even been warned by security officers when traveling that wearing it is not safe. It took me about 5 yrs to get the need for attention out of my system, and now wear a 1ct solitaire cz 95% of the time and keep my giant ring in a safe. Plus I was tired of hearing my mom bitch about how dangerous it is to wear “that doorknob” around. I’ve also stopped wearing my designer watches after being followed into parking lots. I realized it’s not worth setting yourself up as a target just for the need to show off your wealth. But to answer your question, 2cts isn’t too big these days but it really depends on the quality. I’d rather have a great quality 1ct than a crap 2ct.

So, the tcw is 9 carats? LMAO. God, sounds hideous and stupid. Anyway, agree. A quality 1 ct is better than a low quality larger stone. Also, less is more. Sometimes too much is exactly just that.

To answer OPs question. 2ct isn't necessarily big. It depends on the shape, size of the hand, and also the cut and clarity. All of these things can impact how small or large the stone "shows up".

Round solitaires will always look bigger compared to other shapes. A round 2ct is pretty sizable imo. Not too big but you're not going to miss it. A 3ct round is getting to "overkill"/ looks "silly" territory. A 1ct to 1.5ct round diamond is perfect for everyday wear. With a great cut and clear stone and someone with small hands you could probably do .8ct even. It all depends.

Outside of appearance, diamonds are dumb and I say this as an owner of quite of a few. It is not an "investment". You get it because it's pretty. Don't spend more than makes sense as you qould for anything else that is decorative and not particularly functional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I designed my engagement ring from A to Z. A 5ct E color vvs1 cushion cut with zero fluorescence with 4cts of round diamonds in a halo triple shank platinum setting. It’s obnoxious to say the least with blinding sparkle. I’ve been asked 100s of times if it’s real and have even been warned by security officers when traveling that wearing it is not safe. It took me about 5 yrs to get the need for attention out of my system, and now wear a 1ct solitaire cz 95% of the time and keep my giant ring in a safe. Plus I was tired of hearing my mom bitch about how dangerous it is to wear “that doorknob” around. I’ve also stopped wearing my designer watches after being followed into parking lots. I realized it’s not worth setting yourself up as a target just for the need to show off your wealth. But to answer your question, 2cts isn’t too big these days but it really depends on the quality. I’d rather have a great quality 1ct than a crap 2ct.

So, the tcw is 9 carats? LMAO. God, sounds hideous and stupid. Anyway, agree. A quality 1 ct is better than a low quality larger stone. Also, less is more. Sometimes too much is exactly just that.

To answer OPs question. 2ct isn't necessarily big. It depends on the shape, size of the hand, and also the cut and clarity. All of these things can impact how small or large the stone "shows up".

Round solitaires will always look bigger compared to other shapes. A round 2ct is pretty sizable imo. Not too big but you're not going to miss it. A 3ct round is getting to "overkill"/ looks "silly" territory. A 1ct to 1.5ct round diamond is perfect for everyday wear. With a great cut and clear stone and someone with small hands you could probably do .8ct even. It all depends.

Outside of appearance, diamonds are dumb and I say this as an owner of quite of a few. It is not an "investment". You get it because it's pretty. Don't spend more than makes sense as you qould for anything else that is decorative and not particularly functional.

Plus, a well-cut.8-.9 is not going to look much different visually than 1. And you save money this way, because people are hung up on the 1.0 distinction. If you want 2 carats, go for 1.75 and up and no one will know the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I designed my engagement ring from A to Z. A 5ct E color vvs1 cushion cut with zero fluorescence with 4cts of round diamonds in a halo triple shank platinum setting. It’s obnoxious to say the least with blinding sparkle. I’ve been asked 100s of times if it’s real and have even been warned by security officers when traveling that wearing it is not safe. It took me about 5 yrs to get the need for attention out of my system, and now wear a 1ct solitaire cz 95% of the time and keep my giant ring in a safe. Plus I was tired of hearing my mom bitch about how dangerous it is to wear “that doorknob” around. I’ve also stopped wearing my designer watches after being followed into parking lots. I realized it’s not worth setting yourself up as a target just for the need to show off your wealth. But to answer your question, 2cts isn’t too big these days but it really depends on the quality. I’d rather have a great quality 1ct than a crap 2ct.

So, the tcw is 9 carats? LMAO. God, sounds hideous and stupid. Anyway, agree. A quality 1 ct is better than a low quality larger stone. Also, less is more. Sometimes too much is exactly just that.

To answer OPs question. 2ct isn't necessarily big. It depends on the shape, size of the hand, and also the cut and clarity. All of these things can impact how small or large the stone "shows up".

Round solitaires will always look bigger compared to other shapes. A round 2ct is pretty sizable imo. Not too big but you're not going to miss it. A 3ct round is getting to "overkill"/ looks "silly" territory. A 1ct to 1.5ct round diamond is perfect for everyday wear. With a great cut and clear stone and someone with small hands you could probably do .8ct even. It all depends.

Outside of appearance, diamonds are dumb and I say this as an owner of quite of a few. It is not an "investment". You get it because it's pretty. Don't spend more than makes sense as you qould for anything else that is decorative and not particularly functional.

Plus, a well-cut.8-.9 is not going to look much different visually than 1. And you save money this way, because people are hung up on the 1.0 distinction. If you want 2 carats, go for 1.75 and up and no one will know the difference.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Depends on your social circle. Two carats is the minimum size to not have people talk behind my back and say that my fiancé is a loser.

I would find a new social circle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depends on your social circle. Two carats is the minimum size to not have people talk behind my back and say that my fiancé is a loser.

I would find a new social circle.

No one with real money would care about such a thing. Equating carats to a spouse being a "loser" sounds very nouveau riche. A loser would spend tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands on something with very literal ROI. It's not because the amount of money matters but the principle regarding effectively wasting money; even when you have it to waste. It's foolish.

[Anonymous]

Do you own a home and have substantial savings op? I can't stand women who prioritize big weddings and big rings over their family's future. Go over to the Finance forum and read a bit about saving for retirement and read all the posts from people who regret not saving more.