Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
I suppose you are implying in a smart-alecky way that WaPo article was "approved" by Jeff Bezos who decided to expand in the DC area and also owns WaPo AND there WaPo has no editorial independence..
|
The state education officials and the school board can't hold their d**ks and pee without getting their hands, pants and feet wet. They are already dealing with a major issue - Covid (in case you have forgotten). This is the last thing on their minds.. When you wake up you'll realize that you were just having a dream
|
Source? Would be interesting to see stats on this. I personally know of 7 white females in my son's social circle/group texts that applied. I think 5 or so made it to the second round. None of them was admitted. Two of these girls are clearly more focused and smart than my son and I'm shocked that they were not admitted. One of the moms said that the math teacher had a conversation with her urging her not have her DD apply because of the quite difficult culture for white females. |
What exactly does that mean??? Do they get trafficked? |
The application numbers are not published with that level of granularity, so there's no source to draw on here. About 20% of the applicant pool every year is white, and about 40% of the applicant pool every year is female. Given an average pool of 3000 students, you could probably extrapolate that there would be about 200 white female applicants year-over-year. That number pretty much tracks with what I'm drawing on and isn't a large number when you consider the other demographic factors at play. White families are additionally far less likely to streamline their child's experiences to favor the TJ admissions process than families from other cultures. They may be every bit as smart, or smarter, than the kids who eventually get in, but the application process favors the kid who "proves" their commitment to STEM through their parents signing them up for Science Olympiad, Vex Robotics, and MATHCOUNTS. And that's why the admissions process and priorities need to change. TJ should not be something that you can begin preparing for when you're eight years old. |
They don't get trafficked, but there are too few of them to develop many social groups of their own and they are segregated out of the social groups that other females belong to. Oddly enough, the social groups for boys are much more diverse. But walk through a TJ hallway during lunch and you will see a lot of single-race and single-sex groups that eat together. There are exceptions, to be sure, but they are just that - exceptions. |
+1 |
| I currently supervise people who went to TJ. I went to public school in a crappy state. 1 went to MIT. I went to a state school. TJ is not the end all be all. Who cares. Let the Asians have their thing. |
I agree that it's not the end-all-be-all, but it is a vast improvement over several of the public schools that the underrepresented groups are currently siloed into. |
The difference between TJ and Langley, McLean, Oakton, Woodson, and to a lesser extent Chantilly is much smaller than the difference between TJ and John Lewis (formerly Lee), Edison, Justice, Falls Church, etc. And the kids with parents who have resources, if they don't get into TJ, will frequently choose high-end academic privates like Potomac School, Sidwell, St. Albans, etc that can provide comparable educational experiences. |
| Here's a tangentially relevant question. How different is say, something like college admissions, for your middle of the road TJ kid, from that of your say, top 25% in any FCPS kid? Isn't it better to be a big fish in a small pond than a small fish in a big pond? If the goal is to make sure that URM kids have a fair shot at a good education, then wouldn't it be better to focus efforts on ensuring that they get additional support at their schools, instead of trying to somehow funnel them into TJ? |
look at the college numbers from TJ, compare that to top 25% of most FCPS school and middle of the road TJ is going to be far superior especially compared to struggling high schools. |
It's tangentially relevant, I suppose. Again, it's important to note that a top 25% kid at Langley is very different in terms of profile from a top 25% kid at, say Mt. Vernon. And the goal is to expose these students to a high-caliber education as early as possible, not to see college admissions as the alpha and omega. It's also a false choice to suggest that we need to "focus efforts" on one thing or the other. We should be doing all of the above to ensure that FCPS actually delivers on its promise of a top-notch education for all students. |
Where is this data found? |
|