Prince Harry and Archie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s one and it was reported on multiple sites:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6988803/amp/Meghan-Markle-received-dressing-Queen-following-heated-row-EGG-Windsor-Castle.html

There are a ton. She was supposedly asked to leave Highgrove for showing up too "fashionably late" for Camillas birthday celebration. When you are late to a formal dinner, they have to awkwardly rearrange seating. and often will just take you out. It's usually a two hour cocktail before dinner. If you can't bother to show, you will kindly be asked to wait until the after party or asked to leave.

It's just playing the Hollywood cards everywhere....

"When in Rome"...

You mean the celebrations of Camilla's birthday in Mid-July 2017 when Megan was supposed to be on the set of Suits by July 5, 2017? Kind of hard to be at a party in England at the same time you're working on Canada. Besides, if you think about it, if she HAD been invited to Camila's party, she would have been picked up or met by Harry. The logic thing would for him to say 'I'll pick you up at......or I'll see you at...... or the car will pick you up at.......That's pretty standard no matter which country you're in.

I'm indifferent to Markle but some of this sh!t people are saying is just crazy. Markle isn't stupid and can tell the difference between a Hollywood event and a non-Hollywood event.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2017062740166/meghan-markle-arrives-london-prince-harry/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/15/highgrove-party-duchess-now-firmly-peoples-hearts-250-attend/

It was this year's dinner.

[Anonymous]

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Thank you for responding with facts. People think they can just say anything and not have anything to back up their hysterics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Thank you for responding with facts. People think they can just say anything and not have anything to back up their hysterics.

You mean like the hysterics around William's cheating ways without proof? Nobody cares about facts here, it's all tabloid rumors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Yes. This past July. I actually was looking for the articles, but it looks like they were scrubbed. Lets keep in mind, Facts are what the BRF allows to be printed for mass consumption. There was a flurry about this at the time bc it was a decent size guest group, but it was clearly tamped down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Yes. This past July. I actually was looking for the articles, but it looks like they were scrubbed. Lets keep in mind, Facts are what the BRF allows to be printed for mass consumption. There was a flurry about this at the time bc it was a decent size guest group, but it was clearly tamped down.

It is still quoted on blogs, though, such as the "Harry Markle" one, which is vehemently anti- MM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Yes. This past July. I actually was looking for the articles, but it looks like they were scrubbed. Lets keep in mind, Facts are what the BRF allows to be printed for mass consumption. There was a flurry about this at the time bc it was a decent size guest group, but it was clearly tamped down.

It is still quoted on blogs, though, such as the "Harry Markle" one, which is vehemently anti- MM.

Yes, if it is “reported” only on anti MM sites, it must be true.

“Scrubbed” strikes me in the same way as “fake news”.

This board, as a whole, is so weird. It’s all about evidence based everything, unless it doesn’t align with your views or personal opinion.

I love gossip as much as the next person, but I treat it like reading my horoscope: for entertainment purposes only.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Thank you for responding with facts. People think they can just say anything and not have anything to back up their hysterics.

You mean like the hysterics around William's cheating ways without proof? Nobody cares about facts here, it's all tabloid rumors.

Investigative facts are different from hysterics, hence the refutation of Meghan supposedly being kicked out of a dinner that happened this year when the birthday girl in question's birthday is NEXT MONTH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So this photo is posted, you don't like it and somehow that becomes Megan's fault? Misogyny is alive and well in here, I see.

As is misspelling of the subject’s name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Thank you for responding with facts. People think they can just say anything and not have anything to back up their hysterics.

You mean like the hysterics around William's cheating ways without proof? Nobody cares about facts here, it's all tabloid rumors.

Investigative facts are different from hysterics, hence the refutation of Meghan supposedly being kicked out of a dinner that happened this year when the birthday girl in question's birthday is NEXT MONTH.

This past July!!?? What is hard to understand??!!

[Anonymous]

Charles’s birthday.
He celebrates once in the spring because November is awful weather.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It was this year's dinner.

Camilla's birthday is in July. Who's birthday are you talking about? Charles' birthday is in November. I've not read anything that indicates she arrived so late to an even that she was asked to leave. Where did you find that? Don't you think Harry would have made sure she got there on time? He certainly seems to have no problem coaching her and she seems to have no problems asking/receiving direction (I'm thinking of the curtsy on the palace balcony). Your assertion just doesn't make any sense - unless, of course, you just want to perpetuate vicious lies.

Thank you for responding with facts. People think they can just say anything and not have anything to back up their hysterics.

You mean like the hysterics around William's cheating ways without proof? Nobody cares about facts here, it's all tabloid rumors.

Investigative facts are different from hysterics, hence the refutation of Meghan supposedly being kicked out of a dinner that happened this year when the birthday girl in question's birthday is NEXT MONTH.

This past July!!?? What is hard to understand??!!

Maybe you need to confer with your friend and decide whose birthday it was first. Charles or Camilla. July or Spring.

[Anonymous]

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a19830489/julie-montagu-advice-meghan-markle/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a19830489/julie-montagu-advice-meghan-markle/

Loved this video - thanks for sharing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a19830489/julie-montagu-advice-meghan-markle/

That article comes at it from another angle. The only point I was hoping to make is that she might want to throw the public a bone now and then.

Kate has studied extensively bc she had no choice, she has had to work endlessly at learning all of the aristo knowledge and history. She has no choice, and this is as much her work as the public appearances. She has done a great job, weathered insane mockery and criticism, again not published, and still has a lot to do.

Comparatively speaking Meghan and Harry do have a choice and are pretty clear about that. They all know Meghan will never be accepted by the upper echelons, so why even bother? It makes sense.

The turnover of long term staff is problematic, bc they are losing the advice that keeps things roughly contained. Worse yet, H & M are publicly publicly funded, so they risk a ton by playing too many games with the British public, she needs to acquiesce a little.