Prince Harry and Archie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:weird that they never want to show his full face. I'm half expecting a weird mole or something.

She was so careful to adjust the blanket around his face at the first photo call. I figured to block the glare from the lights / flash... But who knows, maybe he has a cleft palate or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

+4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

+4

I agree with all of you that it’s gross but unfortunately it’s not the worst thing that people are saying. Twitter is a cesspool.

[Anonymous]

How are there 6 pages about that photo?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

+4

I agree with all of you that it’s gross but unfortunately it’s not the worst thing that people are saying. Twitter is a cesspool.

Sorry, my bad. I just think she is cutting herself off at the knees being so controlling about everything. There is a give and take. Give people photos of the baby, one shot, so that you can wear your Givenchy and change the world jet setting between holidays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

+4

I agree with all of you that it’s gross but unfortunately it’s not the worst thing that people are saying. Twitter is a cesspool.

Sorry, my bad. I just think she is cutting herself off at the knees being so controlling about everything. There is a give and take. Give people photos of the baby, one shot, so that you can wear your Givenchy and change the world jet setting between holidays.

Just to clarify, OP here, I want her to do the coll stuff, change the world, break the mold, all the stuff she said.

I just think you have to play by some of the rules, and at least know them so you can break the rest. She did well so far but has been getting undercut a lot and it's not going well. Angie and Brad did the "big reveal" ... she is tax payer funded and has joined an ancient establishment that is already on its knees... can she give a little?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

+4

I agree with all of you that it’s gross but unfortunately it’s not the worst thing that people are saying. Twitter is a cesspool.

Sorry, my bad. I just think she is cutting herself off at the knees being so controlling about everything. There is a give and take. Give people photos of the baby, one shot, so that you can wear your Givenchy and change the world jet setting between holidays.

Just to clarify, OP here, I want her to do the coll stuff, change the world, break the mold, all the stuff she said.

I just think you have to play by some of the rules, and at least know them so you can break the rest. She did well so far but has been getting undercut a lot and it's not going well. Angie and Brad did the "big reveal" ... she is tax payer funded and has joined an ancient establishment that is already on its knees... can she give a little?

sorry, meant PP here. ! apologies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

+4

I agree with all of you that it’s gross but unfortunately it’s not the worst thing that people are saying. Twitter is a cesspool.

Sorry, my bad. I just think she is cutting herself off at the knees being so controlling about everything. There is a give and take. Give people photos of the baby, one shot, so that you can wear your Givenchy and change the world jet setting between holidays.

Provide one verified, or even reliable leak about her being controlling or deviating from how other royals do? William and Kate do minimally more exposure, and their family is the direct line.

[Anonymous]

Here’s one and it was reported on multiple sites:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6988803/amp/Meghan-Markle-received-dressing-Queen-following-heated-row-EGG-Windsor-Castle.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all will hate on anything just to hate on it. I think it’s a cute photo. Probably better than most photos I’ve seen all day long of the gratuitous Facebook and instagram postings to “the best dad ever!!!”

+1 As a parent, there's a special joy when your baby's tiny hand tightly holds your finger.

+2 One of my favorite pictures of our baby is from when she was a week or two old and my husband was syringe-feeding her. She looks so tiny next to his hand, and she's grabbing his ring finger right under his wedding ring. It's so sweet. Newborn photographers are always taking pictures of babies staged to show how they fit into the dad's hands.

Only on DCUM would a classic "look how little the baby is in Daddy's hands" picture devolve into name calling and speculating about a cleft palate.

+3. It's disgusting.

+4

I agree with all of you that it’s gross but unfortunately it’s not the worst thing that people are saying. Twitter is a cesspool.

Sorry, my bad. I just think she is cutting herself off at the knees being so controlling about everything. There is a give and take. Give people photos of the baby, one shot, so that you can wear your Givenchy and change the world jet setting between holidays.

Provide one verified, or even reliable leak about her being controlling or deviating from how other royals do? William and Kate do minimally more exposure, and their family is the direct line.

They work through the system.

And sorry being in the direct line doesnt mean that Harry and Meghan aren't tax-payer funded. She didnt just marry into a wealthy family. She married into a publicly funded wealthy family.

There are tons of annoying rules to follow and difficult personalities to deal withif you marry into a mega wealthy family. Like an average one.

Dd she really think she could marry into the British Royal Family and not have to do more than a few appearances on her own terms? Her outfits cost annual salaries.

I guess I just hoped she was smarter than this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s one and it was reported on multiple sites:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6988803/amp/Meghan-Markle-received-dressing-Queen-following-heated-row-EGG-Windsor-Castle.html

There are a ton. She was supposedly asked to leave Highgrove for showing up too "fashionably late" for Camillas birthday celebration. When you are late to a formal dinner, they have to awkwardly rearrange seating. and often will just take you out. It's usually a two hour cocktail before dinner. If you can't bother to show, you will kindly be asked to wait until the after party or asked to leave.

It's just playing the Hollywood cards everywhere....

"When in Rome"...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s one and it was reported on multiple sites:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6988803/amp/Meghan-Markle-received-dressing-Queen-following-heated-row-EGG-Windsor-Castle.html

There are a ton. She was supposedly asked to leave Highgrove for showing up too "fashionably late" for Camillas birthday celebration. When you are late to a formal dinner, they have to awkwardly rearrange seating. and often will just take you out. It's usually a two hour cocktail before dinner. If you can't bother to show, you will kindly be asked to wait until the after party or asked to leave.

It's just playing the Hollywood cards everywhere....

"When in Rome"...

Just to follow up on this, PP here, when you are close family, no matter how many staff there are, you are considered part of the team, part of the hosting committee. there to greet guests. Not to be the main attraction showing up late and distracting from the main focus of the evening.

Anyway, enough about all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s one and it was reported on multiple sites:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6988803/amp/Meghan-Markle-received-dressing-Queen-following-heated-row-EGG-Windsor-Castle.html

There are a ton. She was supposedly asked to leave Highgrove for showing up too "fashionably late" for Camillas birthday celebration. When you are late to a formal dinner, they have to awkwardly rearrange seating. and often will just take you out. It's usually a two hour cocktail before dinner. If you can't bother to show, you will kindly be asked to wait until the after party or asked to leave.

It's just playing the Hollywood cards everywhere....

"When in Rome"...

You mean the celebrations of Camilla's birthday in Mid-July 2017 when Megan was supposed to be on the set of Suits by July 5, 2017? Kind of hard to be at a party in England at the same time you're working on Canada. Besides, if you think about it, if she HAD been invited to Camila's party, she would have been picked up or met by Harry. The logic thing would for him to say 'I'll pick you up at......or I'll see you at...... or the car will pick you up at.......That's pretty standard no matter which country you're in.

I'm indifferent to Markle but some of this sh!t people are saying is just crazy. Markle isn't stupid and can tell the difference between a Hollywood event and a non-Hollywood event.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2017062740166/meghan-markle-arrives-london-prince-harry/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/15/highgrove-party-duchess-now-firmly-peoples-hearts-250-attend/