Rose Hanbury sat at Prince William’s table

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who?

The English Rose Prince William dipped his wick in.

If there were any truth to that rumor that ugly giraffe would not be there tonight. You are so thirteen.

Enough truth that Prince William sent his lawyers running.[/quote

DP Either way you would find Prince William guilty. If he had said nothing you would say "see he did have an affair because he isn't defending himself" And when he does you say "see he did have an affair because "enough truth that he sent his lawyers running."

I very much doubt it because he know how much it hurt his mother and she wouldn't have been invited.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/children-with-unfaithful-parents-more-likely-to-cheat-2017-10

He can’t not invite her. 1) protocol that her husband is invited seems to follow she can’t be excluded as his guest 2) only person who I can imagine who can uninvite someone would be the Queen

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is there a thing about wearing white to this event? Many of the women are (Queen, Camilla, Melania, Kate...)
Someone else posted in the Trump women fashion thread that protocol says covered shoulders for these dinners....but Rose is bare-shouldered. Is there a protocol?

For those reading "signs" into everything....Kate is wearing Diana's favorite tiara, which COULD be read to a subtle sign to her husband (what would your mom think about your tom-catting) and a sign to Rose (she's the future queen of england, and rose can jump in the lake).

Pretty sure the Queen determines which tiara Kate can borrow. Although perhaps she let her choose because she felt for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there a thing about wearing white to this event? Many of the women are (Queen, Camilla, Melania, Kate...)
Someone else posted in the Trump women fashion thread that protocol says covered shoulders for these dinners....but Rose is bare-shouldered. Is there a protocol?

For those reading "signs" into everything....Kate is wearing Diana's favorite tiara, which COULD be read to a subtle sign to her husband (what would your mom think about your tom-catting) and a sign to Rose (she's the future queen of england, and rose can jump in the lake).

Pretty sure the Queen determines which tiara Kate can borrow. Although perhaps she let her choose because she felt for her.

That's the only tiara Kate has formally on loan from the Queen. If its not her daughter, the Queen is stingy with loaning out tiaras.

Diana also only had that same one plus the Spencer tiara which came from her aristo family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

This is about as credible as The Enquirer, right?

I feel sorry for Kate. I really do. I'd love to see her divorce that horse face.

That’s the same magazine that has declared Jennifer Aniston pregnant dozens of times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I couldn't even stand seeing those Trumptards mingling with the royal family. Such a waste of important people's time.

However, it was a time for Kate to make it v clear she is numero uno around there these days and soon will be queen and the Rose's in her life can suck it.

1) she’s not numero uno...Camilla outranks her and obviously QE2 is still on the throne 2) the only person who can make the “Rose’s in her life suck it” is prince William. No sense in petty power plays when your husband is the one giving these women relevance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

This is about as credible as The Enquirer, right?

I feel sorry for Kate. I really do. I'd love to see her divorce that horse face.

Well, UK reporters want to talk about it. They just can't.

Insane to me that this country can’t report on th- *three eds leap the news desk to tackle me*

- Media and Politics Reporter, Buzzfeed UK

https://twitter.com/MarkDiStef/status/1135846571688562689?s=20

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

Well this is obviously BS. I mean Brad Pitt hotter than ever? I don’t think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there a thing about wearing white to this event? Many of the women are (Queen, Camilla, Melania, Kate...)
Someone else posted in the Trump women fashion thread that protocol says covered shoulders for these dinners....but Rose is bare-shouldered. Is there a protocol?

For those reading "signs" into everything....Kate is wearing Diana's favorite tiara, which COULD be read to a subtle sign to her husband (what would your mom think about your tom-catting) and a sign to Rose (she's the future queen of england, and rose can jump in the lake).

Pretty sure the Queen determines which tiara Kate can borrow. Although perhaps she let her choose because she felt for her.

That's the only tiara Kate has formally on loan from the Queen. If its not her daughter, the Queen is stingy with loaning out tiaras.

Diana also only had that same one plus the Spencer tiara which came from her aristo family.

+1. If I'm not mistaken, Kate got this tiara (Queen Mary's Lovers Knot) on long-term loan from the Queen after George's birth. Before that she wore a smaller one a few times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

That website hosting the image is blocked by my office.

What does it show? Can someone repost to Imgur?

[Anonymous]

I think op is gleeful about this (this being, the speculation, the possibility. If there were any more certainty, she’d be throwing a party).
It’s gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

Honestly, I'm struck by how similar Kate and Rose are. Tall, skinny, long-faced brunettes. You'd think if William were going to step out, it would be with a bouncy, buxom blonde or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

That website hosting the image is blocked by my office.

What does it show? Can someone repost to Imgur?

It’s the cover of In touch magazine. Google it later.

It’s full of non specific and loose-ended phrases. As usual

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

That website hosting the image is blocked by my office.

What does it show? Can someone repost to Imgur?

This is the cover



https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/intouch-weekly-american-media/1129108728

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.

It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!

I disagree. Kate looks regal. This woman looks like she walked in from Forever 21.

+1 I like Kate’s dress. It has a sense of style. The other dress is about unimaginative as they come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think op is gleeful about this (this being, the speculation, the possibility. If there were any more certainty, she’d be throwing a party).
It’s gross.

Exactly. Why would you want another Camilla. Heartbreaking.

It’s all possible. We’d always imagine late as the queen. She may never get there. But she doesn’t deserve it, if any of it’s true.