Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

[Anonymous]

He needs to go.

And his bank accounts should be closely scrutinized. He was paid off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sec Acosta should just resign now, and Epstien, Dersh and Trump (and possibly Clinton) should all be a little nervous.

What’s the appropriate punishment for Acosta? Being disbarred? A fine? Jail?

[Anonymous]

Ironically, it may be Trump who saves Acosta, and many others involved. If the Mueller report does indeed come out in the next few days, this news will get buried...again. It's never really gotten the light it needs outside of South Florida, and now it looks like it won't again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ironically, it may be Trump who saves Acosta, and many others involved. If the Mueller report does indeed come out in the next few days, this news will get buried...again. It's never really gotten the light it needs outside of South Florida, and now it looks like it won't again.

The wheels of justice turn slowly; but they grind into dust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sec Acosta should just resign now, and Epstien, Dersh and Trump (and possibly Clinton) should all be a little nervous.

What’s the appropriate punishment for Acosta? Being disbarred? A fine? Jail?

And what happens to the original investigation that produced the non-prosecution agreement for Epstein and the anonymous others?

[Anonymous]

This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

It’s when stories like these go away quietly that I can’t help but wonder if the management of media companies are themselves compromised in some way. Why else would stories like this get almost zero coverage and non-issues like a crazy man staging a crime get wall to wall coverage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

It’s when stories like these go away quietly that I can’t help but wonder if the management of media companies are themselves compromised in some way. Why else would stories like this get almost zero coverage and non-issues like a crazy man staging a crime get wall to wall coverage?

Your crazy man is an evil hater.

[Anonymous]

pretty wild how the scandals Trumpworld and its crazy supporters threw at Hillary -- charity abuse, nuclear power graft, child sex ring coverup -- are coming to life inside the Trump administration

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

It’s when stories like these go away quietly that I can’t help but wonder if the management of media companies are themselves compromised in some way. Why else would stories like this get almost zero coverage and non-issues like a crazy man staging a crime get wall to wall coverage?

Your crazy man is an evil hater.

I was referring to non-issue Jussie Smollett.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

It’s when stories like these go away quietly that I can’t help but wonder if the management of media companies are themselves compromised in some way. Why else would stories like this get almost zero coverage and non-issues like a crazy man staging a crime get wall to wall coverage?

Your crazy man is an evil hater.

And the guy whom a federal judge found to be running a sex-trafficking ring is what exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

It’s when stories like these go away quietly that I can’t help but wonder if the management of media companies are themselves compromised in some way. Why else would stories like this get almost zero coverage and non-issues like a crazy man staging a crime get wall to wall coverage?

Your crazy man is an evil hater.

I was referring to non-issue Jussie Smollett.

Yes, Smollett is an evil hater.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

It’s when stories like these go away quietly that I can’t help but wonder if the management of media companies are themselves compromised in some way. Why else would stories like this get almost zero coverage and non-issues like a crazy man staging a crime get wall to wall coverage?

Your crazy man is an evil hater.

I was referring to non-issue Jussie Smollett.

Yes, Smollett is an evil hater.

And again, the guy whom a federal judge found to be running a sex-trafficking ring - the guy who is the actual topic of this thread - is what exactly? And what about the lawyers who covered it up? Including the current secretary of labor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge news and should get enough news coverage...but these days its hard to tell!

It’s when stories like these go away quietly that I can’t help but wonder if the management of media companies are themselves compromised in some way. Why else would stories like this get almost zero coverage and non-issues like a crazy man staging a crime get wall to wall coverage?

Your crazy man is an evil hater.

I was referring to non-issue Jussie Smollett.

Yes, Smollett is an evil hater.

And again, the guy whom a federal judge found to be running a sex-trafficking ring - the guy who is the actual topic of this thread - is what exactly? And what about the lawyers who covered it up? Including the current secretary of labor?

So crickets on Jeffrey Epstein, Trump’s good buddy who trafficks underage girls?

[Anonymous]

Can someone explain to me why this dragged on for 11 years?
I understand Acosta was in charge when the deal was cut, but can someone explain to me why this took 11 years?