Southern Poverty Law Center has Millions in Offshore Banks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has it ever occurred to your right wing knuckleheads that a tax exempt organization has no need to evade taxes?

OP here and never said that the SPLC was trying to avoid taxes. What I did say was why does a non-profit need offshore accounts? Possibly to skirt Federal Law and hide it's sponsors?

Um, the federal law that you skirt with offshore accounts is taxes.

And as has been stated many times before, they have an investment portfolio that includes alternative investments like hedge funds. Many of them run their operations out of other countries, and owning shares in them is not a problem at all.

So again. What taxes? They are a nonprofit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I see the Free Beacon as suspicious.

Maybe you'd prefer this liberal source:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2012/8/27/1124823/-SPLC-238M-assets-Bermuda-acct-co-owns-foreign-firms

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's keep pretending SPLC does not have any suspicios off-shore accounts by attacking the sources.

No need to concede any facts here; even if they are in fact true. La la la la la la . . .

Exactly. Don't refute the accusations (they can't) but attack the source, and call those who expose such things.... racists. Shocker, right?

Typical, tired, liberal tactics.

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's been mentioned before on this thread. SPLC did good work in the past. Today, they are just another political action group -but are posing as an anti-hate group. They are very slow to deem any leftist group as hateful.

Once upon a time, they went after group that espoused violence. Now, they go after any group that disagrees with them.

THIS x100.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lots of people start out with all good intentions, but then the wrong people get too much power and things go astray.

So true.

SPLC has jumped the shark. Once upon a time, it did good work.

Exactly.

Sure, that's why people still give to them, including me.

People also donate money to the KKK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lots of people start out with all good intentions, but then the wrong people get too much power and things go astray.

So true.

SPLC has jumped the shark. Once upon a time, it did good work.

Exactly.

Sure, that's why people still give to them, including me.

People also donate money to the KKK.

Including you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lots of people start out with all good intentions, but then the wrong people get too much power and things go astray.

So true.

SPLC has jumped the shark. Once upon a time, it did good work.

Exactly.

Sure, that's why people still give to them, including me.

People also donate money to the KKK.

Including you?

DP. Question is, does Hillary?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lots of people start out with all good intentions, but then the wrong people get too much power and things go astray.

So true.

SPLC has jumped the shark. Once upon a time, it did good work.

Exactly.

Sure, that's why people still give to them, including me.

People also donate money to the KKK.

Including you?

DP. Question is, does Hillary?

Answer is, no she does not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lots of people start out with all good intentions, but then the wrong people get too much power and things go astray.

So true.

SPLC has jumped the shark. Once upon a time, it did good work.

Exactly.

Sure, that's why people still give to them, including me.

People also donate money to the KKK.

Including you?

DP. Question is, does Hillary?

Answer is, no she does not.

That is, no she does not give to the KKK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's been mentioned before on this thread. SPLC did good work in the past. Today, they are just another political action group -but are posing as an anti-hate group. They are very slow to deem any leftist group as hateful.

Once upon a time, they went after group that espoused violence. Now, they go after any group that disagrees with them.

THIS x100.

EXCEPT!!!! for the 193 Black Separatist Hate Groups in their database.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's keep pretending SPLC does not have any suspicios off-shore accounts by attacking the sources.

No need to concede any facts here; even if they are in fact true. La la la la la la . . .

Exactly. Don't refute the accusations (they can't) but attack the source, and call those who expose such things.... racists. Shocker, right?

Typical, tired, liberal tactics.

+2

Already refuted the accusations several times. Typical conservative tactic to ignore information that disproves you.

[Anonymous]

20% of off shore accounts didn't let people off the the hook in the Panama Papers.

Why the f*ck should non-profits get off the hook?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:20% of off shore accounts didn't let people off the the hook in the Panama Papers.

Why the f*ck should non-profits get off the hook?

because moron, the issue with offshore banks is tax evasion. But nonprofits pay no taxes.

Also, they are invested in funds that are based offshore, which is not the same as having money in a bank somewhere. You might too and not even know it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:20% of off shore accounts didn't let people off the the hook in the Panama Papers.

Why the f*ck should non-profits get off the hook?

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:20% of off shore accounts didn't let people off the the hook in the Panama Papers.

Why the f*ck should non-profits get off the hook?

Exactly.

...chimes in the chorus of DURRRRRRRRR.