Anonymous wrote:NP.
Why are the bitter assholes here pretending that it is not OK for people to seek to maximize their wealth in marrying? Marriage is not only a joining of hearts, it is also a merging of finances. What exactly is the point of having a partner if achieving an upper-middle-class lifestyle is entirely on the OP alone?
Yes, but even in the old days, the women had land, dowry, a title/social status something that they brought to the marriage that benefited the guy. It's never one sided. The bottom line is if they can live off his salary for the most part and use what she makes (once she finds another job hopefully making at least 60K or more) for awhile they will be in decent shape. I was making more than DH when we met though I never thought of him as a low earner. In my mind we would live as close to as we could off one salary and the other. Don't immediately step up into spending more right away because you have dual incomes.
The compromises mentioned are true, maybe you rent longer, you end up buying a townhouse instead of a SFH, maybe one child or have the them spaced far apart, maybe you save up (remember living as close as possible on one salary) and stay at home for 2 years, not 5 or longer. Whatever it ends up being, you and your DH have to agree. If you can't agree on the compromises/sacrifices or you want the other person to make all the compromises/sacrifices or vice versa, that's how you end up in marriage trouble.
|