Guys why do you like exceptionally petite woman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hardly. The PP is probably a size 1, max a size 2. Not husky.

A size 2 at most stores is not small for someone who is only 5'0".

U must not be petite or short. But a size 2P is for a short and petite frame person. It's equivalent for a size 2R for those 5-4 to 5-8 or a size 2T for tall females. The 2 signifies a fit person. IOW a size 10T is just as a 10R as a 10P - none are on the thin side in a 10.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hardly. The PP is probably a size 1, max a size 2. Not husky.

A size 2 at most stores is not small for someone who is only 5'0".

U must not be petite or short. But a size 2P is for a short and petite frame person. It's equivalent for a size 2R for those 5-4 to 5-8 or a size 2T for tall females. The 2 signifies a fit person. IOW a size 10T is just as a 10R as a 10P - none are on the thin side in a 10.

Definitely not true. Plenty of pudgy women who are only around 5' can get into a size 0-2. Doesn't make them thin or fit. It's not the same as wearing a size 2 when you're 5'6 or so.

[Anonymous]

Since sizes vary so widely I go by waist size. I wear a 24" jeans, am 5'3 and 112. I'm very muscular, muscle is heavy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hardly. The PP is probably a size 1, max a size 2. Not husky.

A size 2 at most stores is not small for someone who is only 5'0".

U must not be petite or short. But a size 2P is for a short and petite frame person. It's equivalent for a size 2R for those 5-4 to 5-8 or a size 2T for tall females. The 2 signifies a fit person. IOW a size 10T is just as a 10R as a 10P - none are on the thin side in a 10.

Definitely not true. Plenty of pudgy women who are only around 5' can get into a size 0-2. Doesn't make them thin or fit. It's not the same as wearing a size 2 when you're 5'6 or so.

+1

[Guerita32]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

You realize that you're short but hardly tiny at that height & weight, right?

She isn't tiny? That is interesting. I am 5' and between 98 and 100lb (depending on if I have my period or not or how many girl scout cookies I have eaten that week) and I get called pretty and tiny all the time.
I heard both of those yesterday. So PUH-LEASE. 5' is small.

[Anonymous]

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

You realize that you're short but hardly tiny at that height & weight, right?

She isn't tiny? That is interesting. I am 5' and between 98 and 100lb (depending on if I have my period or not or how many girl scout cookies I have eaten that week) and I get called pretty and tiny all the time.
I heard both of those yesterday. So PUH-LEASE. 5' is small.

You are the same height as her but weigh 10-12 lbs less that she does. Both of you are small in stature but only you are a small person overall.

[Guerita32]

Anonymous wrote:

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

You realize that you're short but hardly tiny at that height & weight, right?

She isn't tiny? That is interesting. I am 5' and between 98 and 100lb (depending on if I have my period or not or how many girl scout cookies I have eaten that week) and I get called pretty and tiny all the time.
I heard both of those yesterday. So PUH-LEASE. 5' is small.

You are the same height as her but weigh 10-12 lbs less that she does. Both of you are small in stature but only you are a small person overall.

Perhaps she has more muscle than I do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hardly. The PP is probably a size 1, max a size 2. Not husky.

A size 2 at most stores is not small for someone who is only 5'0".

U must not be petite or short. But a size 2P is for a short and petite frame person. It's equivalent for a size 2R for those 5-4 to 5-8 or a size 2T for tall females. The 2 signifies a fit person. IOW a size 10T is just as a 10R as a 10P - none are on the thin side in a 10.

Definitely not true. Plenty of pudgy women who are only around 5' can get into a size 0-2. Doesn't make them thin or fit. It's not the same as wearing a size 2 when you're 5'6 or so.

+1

+2.

I am 5'1" & wore a 2P a couple of weeks after having twins when I was still carrying the most of my baby weight & definitely qualified as "chubby".

Petite clothes are shorter in length but are typically about the same width as non-petite clothes the same size, brand, & style (i.e. a 2P pair of pants from Ann Taylor will have the same the waist measurement as the same style of 2R pants from Ann Taylor).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hardly. The PP is probably a size 1, max a size 2. Not husky.

A size 2 at most stores is not small for someone who is only 5'0".

U must not be petite or short. But a size 2P is for a short and petite frame person. It's equivalent for a size 2R for those 5-4 to 5-8 or a size 2T for tall females. The 2 signifies a fit person. IOW a size 10T is just as a 10R as a 10P - none are on the thin side in a 10.

Definitely not true. Plenty of pudgy women who are only around 5' can get into a size 0-2. Doesn't make them thin or fit. It's not the same as wearing a size 2 when you're 5'6 or so.

+1

+2.

I am 5'1" & wore a 2P a couple of weeks after having twins when I was still carrying the most of my baby weight & definitely qualified as "chubby".

Petite clothes are shorter in length but are typically about the same width as non-petite clothes the same size, brand, & style (i.e. a 2P pair of pants from Ann Taylor will have the same the waist measurement as the same style of 2R pants from Ann Taylor).

[Anonymous]

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

You realize that you're short but hardly tiny at that height & weight, right?

She isn't tiny? That is interesting. I am 5' and between 98 and 100lb (depending on if I have my period or not or how many girl scout cookies I have eaten that week) and I get called pretty and tiny all the time.
I heard both of those yesterday. So PUH-LEASE. 5' is small.

You are the same height as her but weigh 10-12 lbs less that she does. Both of you are small in stature but only you are a small person overall.

Perhaps she has more muscle than I do?

Seriously, you don't get this?! 10-12 pounds is HUGE when you're that short. I weigh 110 as well, but I'm 5'5.

[Anonymous]

^sorry for the double post

[Guerita32]

Anonymous wrote:

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

You realize that you're short but hardly tiny at that height & weight, right?

She isn't tiny? That is interesting. I am 5' and between 98 and 100lb (depending on if I have my period or not or how many girl scout cookies I have eaten that week) and I get called pretty and tiny all the time.
I heard both of those yesterday. So PUH-LEASE. 5' is small.

You are the same height as her but weigh 10-12 lbs less that she does. Both of you are small in stature but only you are a small person overall.

Perhaps she has more muscle than I do?

Seriously, you don't get this?! 10-12 pounds is HUGE when you're that short. I weigh 110 as well, but I'm 5'5.

d'ok I don't think it is fair say 110 lbs is "HUGE" on any height. My god. Get a grip here.

[Anonymous]

For some of the PPs who say that taller is better/more attractive, I don't find that to be true for women at all (models excepted). I know so many tall women who can't even get a date, whereas all of the short, cute women I know are swarming with men. I think it is a real disadvantage in this country to be too tall as a woman. Maybe it's fine in the Scandinavian countries, but not in the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since sizes vary so widely I go by waist size. I wear a 24" jeans, am 5'3 and 112. I'm very muscular, muscle is heavy.

Muscle is not heavy. It is just more compact so you can weigh more but look thinner if you're muscular. A pound is a pound no matter if it's fat or muscle, it's just that fat is sloppy and big looking and muscle is tight and firm so you look smaller. If you weigh 120 lbs but are muscular you still weigh the same as a 120 lb skinny fat girl. You just look better.

[Anonymous]

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Guerita32 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

You realize that you're short but hardly tiny at that height & weight, right?

She isn't tiny? That is interesting. I am 5' and between 98 and 100lb (depending on if I have my period or not or how many girl scout cookies I have eaten that week) and I get called pretty and tiny all the time.
I heard both of those yesterday. So PUH-LEASE. 5' is small.

You are the same height as her but weigh 10-12 lbs less that she does. Both of you are small in stature but only you are a small person overall.

Perhaps she has more muscle than I do?

Seriously, you don't get this?! 10-12 pounds is HUGE when you're that short. I weigh 110 as well, but I'm 5'5.

d'ok I don't think it is fair say 110 lbs is "HUGE" on any height. My god. Get a grip here.

I think that poster meant that 10-13 lbs makes a huge difference when you are that short, not that a woman who is 5'& 110 lbs is huge.