Guys why do you like exceptionally petite woman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most men don't like super short women. They just like very thin women. This is what they think of when they hear "petite" - feminine, delicate, small-boned. Many short women are built like little tanks.

You rarely see tall women who are small boned. Most look like linebackers.

Lol. Yes, all those tall, thin models, actresses, etc. look so much like linebackers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

I completely agree with you- it's ridiculous that overly-sensitive people are flipping out because of one person's preference, especially when it's likely they have physical preferences of their own.

The only thing is, at 110 pounds and 5 ft, you aren't petite. You a short, but a husky, sturdy thing.

Not necessarily... I am shorter than the pp and at 110, I look nothing close to husky or sturdy. In fact, I think I look quite unhealthy at anything less than 105.

But most men I dated preferred small women because they were also smaller than average.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most men don't like super short women. They just like very thin women. This is what they think of when they hear "petite" - feminine, delicate, small-boned. Many short women are built like little tanks.

You rarely see tall women who are small boned. Most look like linebackers.

Are you not familiar with the fashion industry? It was built on tall, waifish women.

That's because the fashion industry is run by gay men. They'd prefer models that look like tall, thin adolescent boys. Real men never watch a fashion show or look at models other than those in the Victoria's Secret catalog (who are not waifs).

[Anonymous]

Spinner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most men don't like super short women. They just like very thin women. This is what they think of when they hear "petite" - feminine, delicate, small-boned. Many short women are built like little tanks.

You rarely see tall women who are small boned. Most look like linebackers.

Are you not familiar with the fashion industry? It was built on tall, waifish women.

That's because the fashion industry is run by gay men. They'd prefer models that look like tall, thin adolescent boys. Real men never watch a fashion show or look at models other than those in the Victoria's Secret catalog (who are not waifs).

Okay, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

I completely agree with you- it's ridiculous that overly-sensitive people are flipping out because of one person's preference, especially when it's likely they have physical preferences of their own.

The only thing is, at 110 pounds and 5 ft, you aren't petite. You a short, but a husky, sturdy thing.

Not necessarily... I am shorter than the pp and at 110, I look nothing close to husky or sturdy. In fact, I think I look quite unhealthy at anything less than 105.

But most men I dated preferred small women because they were also smaller than average.

I'm sure it's possible that you don't look sturdy at sub-5' and 110, but people who are big for their height *always* say they look unhealthy at smaller sizes. When I see them in person and not just on the internet... they look big.

[Anonymous]

As usual, the tall people are sucking all the oxygen out of the room

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just a guys POV but once they are on their backs womens' heights don't really make much of a difference.

You sound boring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't. I am 6'4". I like women who are 5' 9"plus.

I feel sorry for your offspring. They will be HUGE.

Why would you be sorry? Normal/ tall is preferable to Lilliputian.

I think large/real tall girls have hard time socially.

That hasn't been the experience of tall women I know.

It's actually fun to see the insecure girly men run away - saves a lot of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the tall people are sucking all the oxygen out of the room

You just don't appreciate how hard it is for us to be better looking, more intelligent, and more successful than all the shorter people.

[Anonymous]

5, - currently 115 - still fit into a size zero - was too skinny at 105 - ideal weight is 110... I'll get back there come the warmer weather.. my BF is just over 6 feet tall and we fit perfectly....

[Anonymous]

Men like petite women.

Women like providers.

Film at 11.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hardly. The PP is probably a size 1, max a size 2. Not husky.

A size 2 at most stores is not small for someone who is only 5'0".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't. I am 6'4". I like women who are 5' 9"plus.

I feel sorry for your offspring. They will be HUGE.

Why would you be sorry? Normal/ tall is preferable to Lilliputian.

I think large/real tall girls have hard time socially.

That hasn't been the experience of tall women I know.

It's actually fun to see the insecure girly men run away - saves a lot of time.

Yes- running away from giant Amazon beastly women is a natural reaction. And "girly men"? Really?

[Anonymous]

Haha, this thread is hilarious. Only on DCUM can there be a debate about tall vs. short. I had never heard about men liking very short women - news to me. Thin, sure - that's pretty obvious. But I always thought there was a preference for the 5'4-5'7 range. My friends in that range (who are thin and fit) certainly seem to get the most male attention! I'm a shorty myself.