Agreed! But they will try again... |
Yes. http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/03/us/politics/trump-house-ethics-office.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0 |
And yet the party of corruption reversed course ... |
Obviously, they thought it would get little attentions. Say thank you to the liberal media. |
The arrogance of this move is breathtaking. Did they really think that this would go unnoticed? Or did they not care. |
Maybe they are just following Trump's lead. If you just eliminate the ethics committee, then you don't need to have ethics.
If Trump can ignore his conflicts of interest and obvious corruption, why not Congress too? |
ha! |
It's a clowncar. K. Conway was on TV this morning defending the change while Paul Ryan was doing an unprincipled song and dance. Good thing the GOP doesn't embarrass easily. |
Sean Spicer was out defending it today too. The transition seems to be rudderlesss. |
Well, so is the IRS and FBI - supposedly bi-partisan but have been used by Obama as tools against republicans. |
See? A democratic republic at work. Sham on the for even trying. Whatever grievances they have with the committee, neutering it completely is not in keeping with the intent of such an independent committee. |
Trump finally found a group of people to look him look smart and reasonable -- hats off to the House GOP. |
I lol'd. This is definitely not the worst we've seen recently. Remember the bill to allow lawsuits against a foreign country? Not only did they pass it but overrode a presidential veto and *THEN* came back to suspend it just prior to it taking effect and blamed Obama for not being vocal enough against it. This one they at least stopped short of even putting it up for an official vote. - a republican |
+1 Another Republican, and I rolled my eyes at that vote, too. Dumbasses, the lot of them. |
Ryan is now speaking to preserving the 'sacred truth'. *gag* |