I've re-read the thread and didn't find the quote you cited. This is the closest thing I found - a lot different than what you imply. Yet, another illustration of why a paper trail is so important. Honestly, I don't care if you laugh at me; it just reflects your lack of professionalism. I can assure you that supervisors above you take note of your lack of response and snickering and it is a detriment to your career progress and opportunities. |
This is so true! OP has things so, so backward. |
|
Wow. After reading through this thread, I'm very thankful my child's teacher communicates effectively and quickly. After hours, weekend, holiday or not, and that I am not limited to a certain number per month. We speak daily and sometimes multiple times a day about DC.
OP email the service provider for questions or concerns in regards to that. Do you see the teacher daily? If I email DC teacher and she needs to find out before she can answer and it might take a few days, she'll reply back.right away and say exactly that. |
PP here. I agree with you that an out of office message should be in place in this circumstance. That is the county's expectation, as well. To clarify, I do not reply to emails on my non-duty days because I do not check my MCPS email on those days because I am employed elsewhere at those times. When I am on-duty with MCPS I typically respond to emails immediately. Of course, a reply should be expected within 24 hours, I only point out that there are other factors. Further, you may not be aware that MCPS's technology is abysmal. I've sent emails that are supposedly never received, have sent an email that somehow was received in duplicate half a dozen times, and my out of office response is not always reliable. I test these things myself periodically and I print every email of import that I receive/send. It's an annoyance, but a necessity. I'd save them electronically, but my computer's hard drive is full and the county will not deal with this. This is another layer of challenge that we face. Finally, I think it is appropriate to seek guidance elsewhere if a timely reply is not received. In the case of therapy service providers, the best POC would be the RTSE, who would likely be able to inform you of other factors that may exist. In sum, there are many constraints that exist in the school system. Regardless, if you have a pressing concern, go right ahead and bump your question up the chain. There are always some parents who abuse our time, but there are always school staff members who abuse their position and don't do their job. It goes both ways. |
PP, thanks for defending me. I am not OP. I definitely do not elevate non-responses in order to get the non-responder hoping that someone's career will be jeopardized, but I do find that the non-responders are often quite willing to carry on and do things that jeopardize their career on their own instead of taking the lifeline they have been thrown when I politely raise a question about something that has gone wrong. As for "accepting" myself and my kid, I whole-heartedly accept us both. I accept that my kid is a gifted/high IQ child with learning disabilities. I accept that my GT/LD child needs some changes to the classroom experience to be able to access the high level of instruction that he is capable of. I accept that I know better than anyone what my child needs and is capable of, because I am the one who interacts with him for the most number of hours per week. I am the one that has read and knows in detail his entire 10 year developmental history, neuropsychological testing and academic history. I accept myself, and I accept that many others will mis-read my support for my son as "denial" or "bitchiness" or "angry" or "helicopter mom". What I will not accept is someone who has little knowledge of my son telling me that he is "stupid" or "lazy" or "unmotivated". I know better than anyone how hard he is working to compensate for his learning differences. I will not accept a teacher who refuses to provide accommodations or specialized instruction per the IEP. I will not accept the judgment of an IEP team that implies that the reason my child is not on grade level is that he is not able, particularly when his neuropsychological report indicates otherwise and when the school has consistently failed to provide adequate specialized instruction. What I will not accept is teachers and IEP team members who choose to label me instead of fixing their mistakes. I accept myself. I accept that I am a well-educated parent capable of reading the law, the neuroscience and the educational literature. I accept that I am an equal at the IEP table and in my child's education. It took me a long time to accept these things. Early in our special education journey, I was all too willing to accept others' criticism of myself and my child and to doubt what I knew to be true. To the PP who said, "accept yourself," if you are a teacher, I feel very sorry for your students. There are a small minority of teachers who choose to blame their own failures on their students. They say to themselves, "I taught it. He didn't learn it. He must be stupid. It is so sad that he can't accept himself and his parents can't accept him." When you are a teacher with this perspective, you are failing some of the minds in your classroom and you are negatively affecting their lifelong trajectory. That is a tragedy for which you should feel very ashamed. |