5'4"...why? |
Actually no, it's great to be me. 5'9" and awesome legs in or out of heels
|
Boring |
It's so interesting how much variation there is in body types. I'm 5'3" (if I stand up reeeeallllyyyy straight!), and weigh 130. I'm a size 2-4. Smaller in the waist, thicker in the thighs But I workout almost daily and have a more "fit" frame. |
I am leaning towards not believing you. If that is true, why are you such a miserable person that you feel the need to tell others what they need to do to look attractive in your (unwanted, shitty) opinion and why would you say things to other people to make them feel bad about themselves? |
So, you are not 5'9" and you have no idea what it is like to be in a 5'9" body. Regardless, at any height there are a range of weights and sizes that are healthy and fine. What a bunch of harpies you are. |
|
Boring. MK and Coach? Sam Edelman? Not even worth calling out.
Confusing too. Pearls and chucks ... Just why? Asking if you're classy but you don't wear heels and wouldn't be caught dead in hose? Um, at 5'1" heels and hose could do wonders to elongate your body, you might want to try it. |
I wish I could remember which book this was, but there's a whole scene in a Milan Kundera novel where the college student protagonist goes with his older girlfriend to a bar, and is humiliated that she is wearing heels when all the women his age are in flats. It marks her as being old and dowdy, that she is in formal shoes, while the others are in their youthful footwear. Point being that not everyone looks great in heels and sometimes flats are better. |