Hillary just insults a quarter of all Americans

[Anonymous]

I'm a former, but now refined and born again asshole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is America doesn't like liars, regardless of the complicit media trying to sweep under the rug Clintons past.

Which is why they hate Trump. Biggest liar of them all. Shockingly so. He just makes stuff up right and left. The man has no honest bone in his body.

Sensationalize - yes

Lies - no

The narrative of the left is to push an agenda that Grubernation has seen already. Worked with McCain and Romney, won't with a fighter like Trump.

? uh.. yes. He is the biggest liar of them all. HRC lies don't even compare to Trump's. I just don't understand how his supporters keep talking about what a liar she is when he's an even bigger liar, by far. Do these people not bother to read and check facts?

Please check the facts:

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

The majority of things he's stated have been found to be false.

True (4%)(9)
Mostly True (11%)(27)
Half True (15%)(36)
Mostly False (18%)(44)
False (35%)(87)
Pants on Fire (18%)(45)
= 71% mostly false, false, pants on fire false

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

True (22%)(55)
Mostly True 28%)(70)
Half True (22%)(54)
Mostly False (15%)(37)
False (11%)(27)
Pants on Fire (2%)(6)

= 28% mostly false, false, pants on fire false



On the front page, there's nothing he's stated that is even somewhat true; they are all false.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/

And what's your point? that Politifact is unbiased? lol

If you were smarter you'd realize that there's no such thing as objectivity. Interpretations vary, and statistics can be twisted to support multiple sides.


http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/28/study-finds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans
Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?
A new study sheds some light on what facts the press most likes to check.

Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."

lol.. usnews is not biased? It's a fluff magazine, never won a pulitzer from what I recall.

I don't understand your point about the GMU study. All it says is that both Repubs and Dems lie. Politifact has stated the same. But, this isn't about Repubs vs Dems, really, because there are many Repubs who are crossing over to vote for HRC (myself included). This is a Trump vs. HRC lies, and I bet if GMU did a study, they'd find Trump lies waaaay more than HRC.

Look, genius - something neg comes out about the Rs, and Breitbart negates it.

But then CNN bites back.

And then FOX News jumps in.

Get it?

There's no such thing as objectivity. A Trump fan is voting for his/her best interests. If that means keeping his coal mining job safe, then he's not wrong. Will you argue against him? saying that his skills are outdated? that his field is dirty? that he deserves to die poor?

A bipartisan president doesn't slam opponents. S/he tries to reach out to folks who are suffering.

Furthermore, people who are racist grow up ignorant. You don't fight ignorance by putting down a group a people with some very harmful and outdated beliefs. You work with them so that their children don't hold onto those same believes.

She doesn't care to do that b/c she's hanging on to the wealthy Libs who snub their noses at the rest of the country. Hollywood, here she comes! Poor whites be damned!

If you can't see HOW that pushes folks toward Trump, then you deserve the president you get.

I wash my hands of this whole election. If that means my third party goes to Trump, so be it. If it goes to Clinton, so be it. I don't favor either one. But I am much angrier at Clinton for being such a hypocrite. She doesn't care about the poor any more than Trump cares about working mothers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anytime someone claims they're a former Republican, just discount it. If they have to work that hard to claim middle of the road objectivity by dropping BS, you know they're full of it.

That's a strange attitude. I would think that you, as a liberal, would be glad that someone "saw the light." So you despise Republicans, but you accuse them of being liars if they moderate their stance? Can't win with you, then. Once a Republican, always a monster, yes?

[Anonymous]

A candidate who speaks her mind. I find her candor refreshing!

[Anonymous]

Btw trump is going to screw himself in the debate when this comes up.

[Anonymous]

Behold! A Basket of Deplorable, Irredeemable Homophobes, Xenophobes Racists !!!!!!!1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is America doesn't like liars, regardless of the complicit media trying to sweep under the rug Clintons past.

Which is why they hate Trump. Biggest liar of them all. Shockingly so. He just makes stuff up right and left. The man has no honest bone in his body.

Sensationalize - yes

Lies - no

The narrative of the left is to push an agenda that Grubernation has seen already. Worked with McCain and Romney, won't with a fighter like Trump.

? uh.. yes. He is the biggest liar of them all. HRC lies don't even compare to Trump's. I just don't understand how his supporters keep talking about what a liar she is when he's an even bigger liar, by far. Do these people not bother to read and check facts?

Please check the facts:

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

The majority of things he's stated have been found to be false.

True (4%)(9)
Mostly True (11%)(27)
Half True (15%)(36)
Mostly False (18%)(44)
False (35%)(87)
Pants on Fire (18%)(45)
= 71% mostly false, false, pants on fire false

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

True (22%)(55)
Mostly True 28%)(70)
Half True (22%)(54)
Mostly False (15%)(37)
False (11%)(27)
Pants on Fire (2%)(6)

= 28% mostly false, false, pants on fire false



On the front page, there's nothing he's stated that is even somewhat true; they are all false.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/

And what's your point? that Politifact is unbiased? lol

If you were smarter you'd realize that there's no such thing as objectivity. Interpretations vary, and statistics can be twisted to support multiple sides.


http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/28/study-finds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans
Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?
A new study sheds some light on what facts the press most likes to check.

Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."

lol.. usnews is not biased? It's a fluff magazine, never won a pulitzer from what I recall.

I don't understand your point about the GMU study. All it says is that both Repubs and Dems lie. Politifact has stated the same. But, this isn't about Repubs vs Dems, really, because there are many Repubs who are crossing over to vote for HRC (myself included). This is a Trump vs. HRC lies, and I bet if GMU did a study, they'd find Trump lies waaaay more than HRC.

Look, genius - something neg comes out about the Rs, and Breitbart negates it.

But then CNN bites back.

And then FOX News jumps in.

Get it?

There's no such thing as objectivity. A Trump fan is voting for his/her best interests. If that means keeping his coal mining job safe, then he's not wrong. Will you argue against him? saying that his skills are outdated? that his field is dirty? that he deserves to die poor?

A bipartisan president doesn't slam opponents. S/he tries to reach out to folks who are suffering.

Furthermore, people who are racist grow up ignorant. You don't fight ignorance by putting down a group a people with some very harmful and outdated beliefs. You work with them so that their children don't hold onto those same believes.

She doesn't care to do that b/c she's hanging on to the wealthy Libs who snub their noses at the rest of the country. Hollywood, here she comes! Poor whites be damned!

If you can't see HOW that pushes folks toward Trump, then you deserve the president you get.

I wash my hands of this whole election. If that means my third party goes to Trump, so be it. If it goes to Clinton, so be it. I don't favor either one. But I am much angrier at Clinton for being such a hypocrite. She doesn't care about the poor any more than Trump cares about working mothers.

I think you are confused about my post. I actually think her statement was a mistake. Any potential POTUS should try to be inclusive as much as possible, that I agree.

My post was addressing who the bigger liar is. I realize that Trump supporters are voting based on their own interests, but it's hypocritical for Trump supporters to keep saying she is a liar and a crook when it's been proven that he is an even bigger liar, and most definitely a crook as well. Do his supporters all of a sudden think he won't be unethical and crooked if he becomes POTUS, that if he has bought politicians that he won't mind being the bought? Like I stated, it's become a tit for tat game, but the bigger liar is most definitely Trump.

And there are *many* non wealthy people who are voting for her, just as there are some educated people voting for Trump, though the overall majority educated are voting for HRC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

But isn't this the season of anti-political correctness?

For most anyone else, yes. For the establishment, race-baiting, former Tammy Wynette Senator, no. She's disgusting.

Oh, as long as the minorities can be called for what it is, it is fine to be NOT politically correct. But the moment some truth that SOME, she didn't say all , are racists and bigots then it hurts. Just like Trump the Bully, can only dish it out but can't take it.

Trump is not disgusting for conning his usual idiots who send him their lil money so he can SELF FUND his campaign. Trump is not disgusting for screwing American workers by hiring foreigners and making stuff in China. Trump is not disgusting for not lying any taxes while ordinary Americans pay so much. Trump is not disgusting for mocking the veterans and disabled. Trump is never disgusting coz he is the master for whom his slave supporters are God who can kill and yet they will elect the master.

[Anonymous]

Did she actually say that half the Trump supporters are "irredeemable"? That's actually worse than deplorable. It's like saying a good segment of her subjects....oops, I mean constituents... are hopeless. Did she really say that??

[Anonymous]

There is no such thing as an objective source of news. That does not make all utterances of equal worth.


There is a thing called evidence. And Politifact provides a lot of evidence to back up what they say. If you want to dispute Politifact, you need to point out where they erred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anytime someone claims they're a former Republican, just discount it. If they have to work that hard to claim middle of the road objectivity by dropping BS, you know they're full of it.

I know friends and families who are moderate republicans who are totally turned off by Trump. Trump has turned off educated white families who are traditional republicans. Trump barely got 40% of republican primary voters. Do you think Kasich, Rubio, Cruz, Jeb voters like Trump? Hundreds of republicans have publicly expressed their opposition to Trump. Not one major name republican supports Trump, not McCain , not Romney and the list goes on. You think that doesn't have an impact?

Trump is heavily underforming Romney among republicans. His lead is reduced in AZ,GA,TX, KS, UT, MO etc. These are traditional goo states without a big dem presence. Why? Because moderate Republicans are not supporting him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is America doesn't like liars, regardless of the complicit media trying to sweep under the rug Clintons past.

This is her 47% moment. This morning on CSPAN radio, one woman from Florida, who sounded like an African American Trump supporter, was very upset to the point that she was sobbing on the air ... "I am not a deplorable person ..."

Sounded like an African American ... Is it any wonder that so many are angry about finally being called out on their bigotry? We need more of the no BS Hillary. Maybe it costs her the election but at least someone has finally called out the GOP base for what it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did she actually say that half the Trump supporters are "irredeemable"? That's actually worse than deplorable. It's like saying a good segment of her subjects....oops, I mean constituents... are hopeless. Did she really say that??

The truth hurts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hillary attacks voters again labeling Trump supporters "Irredeemable" and "Not American".

Hitler labeled Jews "Irredeemable" and "Not German".

Wonder what Hillary will propose doing with the "Irredeemable", "Not American" Trump supporters if she wins?

Hillary: A Quarter Of America Is ‘Irredeemable,’ ‘Not America’

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/10/hillary-a-quarter-of-america-is-irredeemable-not-america/



Hear that? That's the sound of a failing campaign.

I believe the elitist-leftist "no label" crowd just pulled out the labeling machine!

The Kasich, Cruz,Rubio voters are not getting on board Trump. Hundreds of republicans have come out against TRump. His love for Putin will take away even more than before. Don't you think all of that has no effect. He is underperforming Romney in states like GA,AZ,UT,TX . Hillary is ahead of Obama in 2012 at this point in most of the tossup states. She is behind where she was a month ago BUT ahead where Obama was in 2012. And we know 2012 turned out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's from Obama and Mooch country and like them, she has an ugly mouth and no class. Even living in the South with her sexual predator husband didn't get her manners. You can't fake Southern Charm no matter how down home you pretend to be.

The Clintons have been and will always be WHITE TRASH WITH MONEY they stole.

You just summed up Trump and his supporters right there.

By not paying people he owes money to, he has stolen money from them.

Many white trash are voting for him.

This is just a tit for tat, really. They are both bad, but he takes it to a whole new level with the amount outright lies compared to HRC, and his hateful rhetoric.

Please, could you not throw around the term "white trash"? It's a pejorative.

I'm done with the double standard. There are plenty of poor whites working hard each day to support themselves and their families. Maybe they live in a trailer home. Maybe they live in the middle of nowhere. Maybe they live in the inner city.

But referring to them as white trash is just as bad as other pejorative terms given to minorities.

But isn't this the season of anti-political correctness?

If that's the case, then all of the pejorative terms assigned to minorities should be resurrected, too, right?

Your game is a losing one, PP.

Isn't that what Trumpkins are already doing? Where have you been for the past year?