Cruz Ad Slut Shames Trump's Wife

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basically, the wealthier Trump has gotten, he's humped is way to better looking women. Melania is a younger version of Marla. He likes firm T&A not brains.

I'm obviously not a woman, but do any of the women out there think that Trump might be more vulnerable with women on this point? The idea that he is constantly "trading up"?

I don't think he traded up. He married melania in her 30s and divorced his ex wives in their early 40s. He would have traded up by now if he wanted to but he's been with melania 11 yrs now. Stop with lies please.

Next month I'll have been married for 20 years to my first and only wife. Maybe you consider three wives with the longest lasting for 11 years to be a normal experience. But, it is not something to which I can relate and I definitely didn't lie.

No offense but you're not a billionaire so you really can't compare.

Uh, that is a really weird response. What does being or not being a billionaire have to do with it? Poor people get divorced and remarried all the time.

Trumpheads apparently can rationalize anything but "Three marriages to increasingly beautiful women is not constantly trading up and you aren't a billionaire so the fact that it seems like a lot of marriages to you is meaningless" is really a stretch.

But, at least you are blaming the size of my wallet and not the size of my hands.

[Anonymous]

Heidi Nelson Cruz is more qualified to be President than either her husband or Trump. Not sure Trump should want to talk about her.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basically, the wealthier Trump has gotten, he's humped is way to better looking women. Melania is a younger version of Marla. He likes firm T&A not brains.

I'm obviously not a woman, but do any of the women out there think that Trump might be more vulnerable with women on this point? The idea that he is constantly "trading up"?

I don't think he traded up. He married melania in her 30s and divorced his ex wives in their early 40s. He would have traded up by now if he wanted to but he's been with melania 11 yrs now. Stop with lies please.

Next month I'll have been married for 20 years to my first and only wife. Maybe you consider three wives with the longest lasting for 11 years to be a normal experience. But, it is not something to which I can relate and I definitely didn't lie.

No offense but you're not a billionaire so you really can't compare.

Uh, that is a really weird response. What does being or not being a billionaire have to do with it? Poor people get divorced and remarried all the time.

Trumpheads apparently can rationalize anything but "Three marriages to increasingly beautiful women is not constantly trading up and you aren't a billionaire so the fact that it seems like a lot of marriages to you is meaningless" is really a stretch.

But, at least you are blaming the size of my wallet and not the size of my hands.

I'm not trying to be mean at all, but you don't have the options trump has and if you did, maybe you would have traded up too. Who's to say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Conservative super pacs in Utah are running ads displaying Trump's wife in a nude photo shoot. I'm not so sure I agree with this but this is definitely not the photo you want in the National Gallery.

Why would a woman who speaks five languages find it necessary to pose nude when she could've used her linguistic skills to benefit others?

And don't give me any of that it's a woman's prerogative to pose nude and the human body is beautiful. Yes, it is beautiful but if it's in a centerfold, it has one purpose, one only.

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/cruz-ad-slut-shames-trumps-wife-160059332.html

Key word is "reportedly". Have you heard her talk? She barely speaks broken English after living in the US for 20+ years. By that standard, I speak 6 languages, but I couldn't get away with putting that on my resume.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basically, the wealthier Trump has gotten, he's humped is way to better looking women. Melania is a younger version of Marla. He likes firm T&A not brains.

I'm obviously not a woman, but do any of the women out there think that Trump might be more vulnerable with women on this point? The idea that he is constantly "trading up"?

I don't think he traded up. He married melania in her 30s and divorced his ex wives in their early 40s. He would have traded up by now if he wanted to but he's been with melania 11 yrs now. Stop with lies please.

Next month I'll have been married for 20 years to my first and only wife. Maybe you consider three wives with the longest lasting for 11 years to be a normal experience. But, it is not something to which I can relate and I definitely didn't lie.

No offense but you're not a billionaire so you really can't compare.

Uh, that is a really weird response. What does being or not being a billionaire have to do with it? Poor people get divorced and remarried all the time.

Trumpheads apparently can rationalize anything but "Three marriages to increasingly beautiful women is not constantly trading up and you aren't a billionaire so the fact that it seems like a lot of marriages to you is meaningless" is really a stretch.

But, at least you are blaming the size of my wallet and not the size of my hands.

I'm not trying to be mean at all, but you don't have the options trump has and if you did, maybe you would have traded up too. Who's to say?

Having more money doesn't change the meaning of the phrase "trading up". Nor does it change the definition of marriage and divorce (and affair).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basically, the wealthier Trump has gotten, he's humped is way to better looking women. Melania is a younger version of Marla. He likes firm T&A not brains.

I'm obviously not a woman, but do any of the women out there think that Trump might be more vulnerable with women on this point? The idea that he is constantly "trading up"?

I don't think he traded up. He married melania in her 30s and divorced his ex wives in their early 40s. He would have traded up by now if he wanted to but he's been with melania 11 yrs now. Stop with lies please.

Next month I'll have been married for 20 years to my first and only wife. Maybe you consider three wives with the longest lasting for 11 years to be a normal experience. But, it is not something to which I can relate and I definitely didn't lie.

No offense but you're not a billionaire so you really can't compare.

Uh, that is a really weird response. What does being or not being a billionaire have to do with it? Poor people get divorced and remarried all the time.

Trumpheads apparently can rationalize anything but "Three marriages to increasingly beautiful women is not constantly trading up and you aren't a billionaire so the fact that it seems like a lot of marriages to you is meaningless" is really a stretch.

But, at least you are blaming the size of my wallet and not the size of my hands.

I'm not trying to be mean at all, but you don't have the options trump has and if you did, maybe you would have traded up too. Who's to say?

Republicans believe there are different rules for the rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Key word is "reportedly". Have you heard her talk? She barely speaks broken English after living in the US for 20+ years. By that standard, I speak 6 languages, but I couldn't get away with putting that on my resume.

So she's a thousand times better than Jeb's wife in both the looks and the English-speaking ability department, then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Republicans believe there are different rules for the rich.

So do Democrats, if all the grotesque liberal hypocrisy on DCUM is any guide.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basically, the wealthier Trump has gotten, he's humped is way to better looking women. Melania is a younger version of Marla. He likes firm T&A not brains.

I'm obviously not a woman, but do any of the women out there think that Trump might be more vulnerable with women on this point? The idea that he is constantly "trading up"?

I don't think he traded up. He married melania in her 30s and divorced his ex wives in their early 40s. He would have traded up by now if he wanted to but he's been with melania 11 yrs now. Stop with lies please.

Next month I'll have been married for 20 years to my first and only wife. Maybe you consider three wives with the longest lasting for 11 years to be a normal experience. But, it is not something to which I can relate and I definitely didn't lie.

No offense but you're not a billionaire so you really can't compare.

Uh, that is a really weird response. What does being or not being a billionaire have to do with it? Poor people get divorced and remarried all the time.

Trumpheads apparently can rationalize anything but "Three marriages to increasingly beautiful women is not constantly trading up and you aren't a billionaire so the fact that it seems like a lot of marriages to you is meaningless" is really a stretch.

But, at least you are blaming the size of my wallet and not the size of my hands.

I'm not trying to be mean at all, but you don't have the options trump has and if you did, maybe you would have traded up too. Who's to say?

So, now you have gone from disputing that Trump is constantly trading up to providing an explanation as to why Trump is able to constantly trade up. Anyone who has a brain knows that the only reason that Trump is able to constantly trade up is due to his wealth. That was never in dispute. What is in dispute is whether constantly trading up may present a potential political vulnerability. Apparently not where Trumpheads are concerned because, based on your posts, all of them would do it if they had the money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservative super pacs in Utah are running ads displaying Trump's wife in a nude photo shoot. I'm not so sure I agree with this but this is definitely not the photo you want in the National Gallery.

Why would a woman who speaks five languages find it necessary to pose nude when she could've used her linguistic skills to benefit others?

And don't give me any of that it's a woman's prerogative to pose nude and the human body is beautiful. Yes, it is beautiful but if it's in a centerfold, it has one purpose, one only.

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/cruz-ad-slut-shames-trumps-wife-160059332.html

Key word is "reportedly". Have you heard her talk? She barely speaks broken English after living in the US for 20+ years. By that standard, I speak 6 languages, but I couldn't get away with putting that on my resume.

Yes I have heard her talking with Mika Brzezinski, Barbara Walter and Greta for half an hour or longer interviews. Her command of English is very good. Can you post your tape that you speak just one foreign language for maybe 5 minutes?

[Anonymous]

A complete non-issue, IMO. Do not care if she has a nice butt or once did. Does she have a brain? (Brains and butts are orthogonal traits). Much more importantly: Does the person who's running for office have one?

Did anyone find out for sure if Cruz's campaign was putting the pic out? If so, just one more piece of evidence he's a sleaze-bucket. And now Jeb? is endorsing him. Lordy, lordy, lordy. What a tribe of friggin' @ssh%les.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:A complete non-issue, IMO. Do not care if she has a nice butt or once did. Does she have a brain? (Brains and butts are orthogonal traits). Much more importantly: Does the person who's running for office have one?

Did anyone find out for sure if Cruz's campaign was putting the pic out? If so, just one more piece of evidence he's a sleaze-bucket. And now Jeb? is endorsing him. Lordy, lordy, lordy. What a tribe of friggin' @ssh%les.

Cruz's campaign didn't put out the ad. The ad was published by a super pac and it would be illegal for the Cruz campaign to coordinate with the super pac (wink wink). The super pac has been pro-Cruz and obviously the ad in question was pro-Cruz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservative super pacs in Utah are running ads displaying Trump's wife in a nude photo shoot. I'm not so sure I agree with this but this is definitely not the photo you want in the National Gallery.

Why would a woman who speaks five languages find it necessary to pose nude when she could've used her linguistic skills to benefit others?

And don't give me any of that it's a woman's prerogative to pose nude and the human body is beautiful. Yes, it is beautiful but if it's in a centerfold, it has one purpose, one only.

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/cruz-ad-slut-shames-trumps-wife-160059332.html

Key word is "reportedly". Have you heard her talk? She barely speaks broken English after living in the US for 20+ years. By that standard, I speak 6 languages, but I couldn't get away with putting that on my resume.

Yes I have heard her talking with Mika Brzezinski, Barbara Walter and Greta for half an hour or longer interviews. Her command of English is very good. Can you post your tape that you speak just one foreign language for maybe 5 minutes?

Yeah, she's really articulate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WXiuKfrX2M

I doubt she's fluent in all the other languages she claims, other than Slovenian.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A complete non-issue, IMO. Do not care if she has a nice butt or once did. Does she have a brain? (Brains and butts are orthogonal traits). Much more importantly: Does the person who's running for office have one?

Did anyone find out for sure if Cruz's campaign was putting the pic out? If so, just one more piece of evidence he's a sleaze-bucket. And now Jeb? is endorsing him. Lordy, lordy, lordy. What a tribe of friggin' @ssh%les.

Cruz's campaign didn't put out the ad. The ad was published by a super pac and it would be illegal for the Cruz campaign to coordinate with the super pac (wink wink). The super pac has been pro-Cruz and obviously the ad in question was pro-Cruz.

Got it. You can see how much I follow this line of news...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's been around since Nancy Reagan. Move along. Nothing to see here.

Yes and I criticized all the first ladies since Jackie O. I think Americans are uncomfortable with royalty. If Michelle Obama really wants to support American designers, but american made labels and shop at jc penneya, sears or the gap (all of which need a boost).