Cruz Ad Slut Shames Trump's Wife

[Anonymous]

Conservative super pacs in Utah are running ads displaying Trump's wife in a nude photo shoot. I'm not so sure I agree with this but this is definitely not the photo you want in the National Gallery.

Why would a woman who speaks five languages find it necessary to pose nude when she could've used her linguistic skills to benefit others? And don't give me any of that it's a woman's prerogative to pose nude and the human body is beautiful. Yes, it is beautiful but if it's in a centerfold, it has one purpose, one only.

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/cruz-ad-slut-shames-trumps-wife-160059332.html

[Anonymous]

She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

[Anonymous]

"Related: Justin Bieber is creepily posting photos of ex Selena Gomez on Instagram again."

How are these two things related?

Anyway, my guess is Trump will double down on attacking Cruz now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

+1

I am European and I agree with this. Americans are so prudish and that is why they see any nudity as pornographic. Geez.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

She may be European but this not going to go without much response in America especially for someone who seeks to be 1st Lady. If any past or present 1st lady had posed provocatively like that, no way would her spouse been elected. However, in this campaign, there are no boundaries so I guess it doesn't matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

+1

I am European and I agree with this. Americans are so prudish and that is why they see any nudity as pornographic. Geez.

Yes, this is exactly why Queen Elizabeth and Princess Madeleine, among other European female politicos, have similar poses so not to appear as prudish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

+1

I am European and I agree with this. Americans are so prudish and that is why they see any nudity as pornographic. Geez.

Yes, this is exactly why Queen Elizabeth and Princess Madeleine, among other European female politicos, have similar poses so not to appear as prudish.

+1 lol

Unfortunately for her, we are in America, and yes, Americans are more prudish. Know your target audience. Why do you think so many politicians are ruined by sex scandals?

[Anonymous]

this is going to backfire.

men are going to see it, and want to vote for trump more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

+1

I am European and I agree with this. Americans are so prudish and that is why they see any nudity as pornographic. Geez.

Are you saying she posed nude for art pics? I thought the pictures were porn. Granted, I haven't seen them.

[Anonymous]

I'm thinking many of the male Trump supporters would find this a reason to vote for him, so they could see her more on tv and fantasize. Since Trump is going after their baser instincts of fear and hatred, why not add horniness?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

+1

I am European and I agree with this. Americans are so prudish and that is why they see any nudity as pornographic. Geez.

Yes, this is exactly why Queen Elizabeth and Princess Madeleine, among other European female politicos, have similar poses so not to appear as prudish.

We have already seen Harry in Las Vegas, and Kate topless.
Only naked William is missing

[Anonymous]

The picture is from 2000, when she was a model. I don't see a problem with it. We are, however, a fairly conservative country who is used to having First Ladies dress conservatively and be demure (in my opinion - I'm remembering all the fracas over Hillary Clinton having opinions and now Michelle Obama daring to bare her arms). I don't think it's very classy to have nude pics of the presidential couple (either of them) around, but honestly, it was fifteen years ago. I don't care.

[Anonymous]

European, schmeuropean. I grew up in Europe, lived there for 10 years. I don't particularly care to see the family of national leaders nude.

Anyone want to see nude pix of Angela Merkel? Ehrffff...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is European, nudity is much more common and accepted.
Because of that all nudity is not seen as 100% yes has to be porn.

+1

I am European and I agree with this. Americans are so prudish and that is why they see any nudity as pornographic. Geez.

Yes, this is exactly why Queen Elizabeth and Princess Madeleine, among other European female politicos, have similar poses so not to appear as prudish.

We have already seen Harry in Las Vegas, and Kate topless.
Only naked William is missing

Those were pap shots while on vacation. This was a purposeful model shoot. There's a difference.

[Anonymous]

So, you people believe she married Trump for love or money?