IB

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TJ's % is actually lowest of three - rm, Blair, then TJ. First two almost at 40% (41kids out of 100), TJ at 32% (162 out of 500)

That reminds me that TJ had roughly twice as many NMSFs than Blair and RM combined. Why are there so few high-achieving students left in Montgomery County? So sad.

If TJ kids are Blair/RM level, they should have 5x more - over 200kids. Do they?

If Montgomery kids were at the Fairfax level, the county would have more students in magnet programs and far more NMSFs. But they don't, which is why TJ alone has more NMSF than all of MCPS.

TJ kids are from 5 different school districts, not just Fairfax.

Fairfax accounts for about 80 to 85% of the TJ students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TJ's % is actually lowest of three - rm, Blair, then TJ. First two almost at 40% (41kids out of 100), TJ at 32% (162 out of 500)

That reminds me that TJ had roughly twice as many NMSFs than Blair and RM combined. Why are there so few high-achieving students left in Montgomery County? So sad.

If TJ kids are Blair/RM level, they should have 5x more - over 200kids. Do they?

If Montgomery kids were at the Fairfax level, the county would have more students in magnet programs and far more NMSFs. But they don't, which is why TJ alone has more NMSF than all of MCPS.

Come back after you find out how many of 162 kids are actually from FCPS. Fairfax having 80 % of of TJ kids doesn't mean 80% of NMSF are from Fairfax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TJ's % is actually lowest of three - rm, Blair, then TJ. First two almost at 40% (41kids out of 100), TJ at 32% (162 out of 500)

That reminds me that TJ had roughly twice as many NMSFs than Blair and RM combined. Why are there so few high-achieving students left in Montgomery County? So sad.

If TJ kids are Blair/RM level, they should have 5x more - over 200kids. Do they?

If Montgomery kids were at the Fairfax level, the county would have more students in magnet programs and far more NMSFs. But they don't, which is why TJ alone has more NMSF than all of MCPS.

Come back after you find out how many of 162 kids are actually from FCPS. Fairfax having 80 % of of TJ kids doesn't mean 80% of NMSF are from Fairfax.

Comeback after you find out how many of 41 kids are actually from RM IB and how many of 41 kids are actually from Blair science magnet. RM/Blair having 41 doesn't mean they are from the magnet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TJ's % is actually lowest of three - rm, Blair, then TJ. First two almost at 40% (41kids out of 100), TJ at 32% (162 out of 500)

That reminds me that TJ had roughly twice as many NMSFs than Blair and RM combined. Why are there so few high-achieving students left in Montgomery County? So sad.

If TJ kids are Blair/RM level, they should have 5x more - over 200kids. Do they?

If Montgomery kids were at the Fairfax level, the county would have more students in magnet programs and far more NMSFs. But they don't, which is why TJ alone has more NMSF than all of MCPS.

Come back after you find out how many of 162 kids are actually from FCPS. Fairfax having 80 % of of TJ kids doesn't mean 80% of NMSF are from Fairfax.

Even if Fairfax kids only accounted for 50%, that would still be twice as many as Blair and RM combined.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TJ's % is actually lowest of three - rm, Blair, then TJ. First two almost at 40% (41kids out of 100), TJ at 32% (162 out of 500)

That reminds me that TJ had roughly twice as many NMSFs than Blair and RM combined. Why are there so few high-achieving students left in Montgomery County? So sad.

If TJ kids are Blair/RM level, they should have 5x more - over 200kids. Do they?

If Montgomery kids were at the Fairfax level, the county would have more students in magnet programs and far more NMSFs. But they don't, which is why TJ alone has more NMSF than all of MCPS.

Come back after you find out how many of 162 kids are actually from FCPS. Fairfax having 80 % of of TJ kids doesn't mean 80% of NMSF are from Fairfax.

Comeback after you find out how many of 41 kids are actually from RM IB and how many of 41 kids are actually from Blair science magnet. RM/Blair having 41 doesn't mean they are from the magnet.

For RMIB, they all are. For Blair, someone posted most are but not all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TJ's % is actually lowest of three - rm, Blair, then TJ. First two almost at 40% (41kids out of 100), TJ at 32% (162 out of 500)

That reminds me that TJ had roughly twice as many NMSFs than Blair and RM combined. Why are there so few high-achieving students left in Montgomery County? So sad.

If TJ kids are Blair/RM level, they should have 5x more - over 200kids. Do they?

If Montgomery kids were at the Fairfax level, the county would have more students in magnet programs and far more NMSFs. But they don't, which is why TJ alone has more NMSF than all of MCPS.

Come back after you find out how many of 162 kids are actually from FCPS. Fairfax having 80 % of of TJ kids doesn't mean 80% of NMSF are from Fairfax.

Even if Fairfax kids only accounted for 50%, that would still be twice as many as Blair and RM combined.[/quote]

That's fist factually correct thing you said. Given it is 5x bigger, I sure hope they produce more... But still lower percentage of overall size. No matter how you cut it, TJ is still third where it belongs.

[Anonymous]

The only thing TJ is third on is a national ranking of high schools where RM and Blair are ranked 193rd and 500th, respectively.

[Anonymous]

TJ dropped to 3rd? No longer the first??

[Anonymous]

So, 3rd in NMSF in DC area and 3rd in ranking too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only thing TJ is third on is a national ranking of high schools where RM and Blair are ranked 193rd and 500th, respectively.

TJ kids are beaten by magnet kids from ranked 193rd and 500th schools? How embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only thing TJ is third on is a national ranking of high schools where RM and Blair are ranked 193rd and 500th, respectively.

TJ kids are beaten by magnet kids from ranked 193rd and 500th schools? How embarrassing.

Not nearly as embarrassing as the fact that the magnet programs at RM and Blair are just a few classrooms of Asian kids in two otherwise mediocre schools, while TJ is regularly identified as one of the top HS in the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:TJ dropped to 3rd? No longer the first??

In order to sell magazines or push internet hits, the list has to change every year or else it would not be remotely newsworthy (not that it is very newsworthy to start)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, 3rd in NMSF in DC area and 3rd in ranking too?

No. Ranked No. 1 by Newsweek 2 years in a row and TJ has the most NMSF of any high schools in the world!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only thing TJ is third on is a national ranking of high schools where RM and Blair are ranked 193rd and 500th, respectively.

TJ kids are beaten by magnet kids from ranked 193rd and 500th schools? How embarrassing.

TJ has a higher percentage of kids as nmsf as well. TJ has about 36 % (163/450), Blair science magnet has about 33 %, RM IB has about 35%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only thing TJ is third on is a national ranking of high schools where RM and Blair are ranked 193rd and 500th, respectively.

TJ kids are beaten by magnet kids from ranked 193rd and 500th schools? How embarrassing.

This is mothing new. Go back and do a historical comparison, you will find ib and blair magnet kids always had higher percentage of NMFS. Not just this year.