You think you're slick but far from it. |
You sound so incredibly shallow and uninformed, OP. Ivies are exceedingly difficult to get into nowadays, and I guarantee that most of the current student and professorial crop have other fish to fry than agonize over the propriety of White ascendency. These are international campuses with tons of perspective. White Guilt is an American thing. |
In all honesty, I do NOT know what the hell you mean. Are you trying to say I am "faking" this? Are opinions that don't fit into your conservative/liberal dichotomy so unsettling to you that they can only be fake? |
I assure you I am certainly not. As for uninformed, it depends on the subject. As for your intentional schools, that was actually a good suggestion. Thanks! If you really don't think most prestigious schools have been immersed in white privilege rhetoric, I'm afraid it is you who is uninformed. |
You are a fraud, and you are fully aware of what your intention was starting this thread. Shovel it elsewhere. |
Wow! Aggressive much? How am i a "fraud? |
+1 |
OP, I am with you ..... and I am a liberal. I do understand what you are getting at even though your construction is somewhat narrow. My kids are done with college but if I were in your position, I'd be similarly concerned. My concerns however would be more focused on the willingness to be open to ideas that don't fit into mainstream liberal opinions. For example, as a liberal who feels the time for affirmative action has come and gone, I am immediately labeled as a closet conservative - never mind that most of my views on social and fiscal issues are fairly liberal and maybe ultra liberal in some instances. But it is this mindset that unless one is lockstep with the standard liberal viewpoint on issues one is no longer liberal. I see this on the political forum as well. Criticism of Obama or the Democrats means one cannot be a liberal. In fairness, conservatives are prone to the same thing. It is an all or nothing attitude. |
Proof please? |
Harvard, a private institution, is not obliged to follow any formula in admissions. They don't have to take the top scoring students only. Further, even if Harvard did decide to admit only the ver top scores, they could fill several freshmen classes with perfect score kids, so it's not clear to me how discrimination is being practiced. FTR, I also have no problem with colleges "discriminating" against students from certain high schools by limiting the number they take from each. Nor am I troubled by UVA's "discrimination" against kids from NoVA. |
@22:29 - there's 25 pages of posts on that topic. Let's not repeat on this thread. Go see Harvard/UNC thread. |
Washington and Lee University. |
Very well put. +1 |
really hard to get in to. But one of my top choices for DC when the time comes. |
I do not totally agree, but your point is a fair point. Your example is not an example of White privilege though. When most people talk about White privilege, they are NOT always saying that Whites are not smart or that Whites don't work hard. What they are saying is that, for the most part and because of society's structure, Whites are in a better position to have their intelligence and hard work pay off. When people criticize Affirmative Action, it is a different tone. Of course, the common example that EVERYONE White who is critical of Affirmative Action uses is the AA or a Hispanic they know who is not effective at work. They don't mention the White co-workers that have the same competency issues - and we all know plenty of those too. And they ignore the minorities and women who are more than qualified but don't get the opportunity. Most of us know people like that also. TBH, I think that empolyers have been lazy in implementing Affirmative Action policies and that is the problem to me. |