It's probably because these perfect scoring kids are a dime a dozen for these ivy leagues. There needs to be something about them that needs to stand out. I read an article by someone who sat on the Admissions Board at a prestigious univ that they are looking for students that will bring different experiences and perspectives to their institutions, not cookie-cutters. For example, one year at an Ivy League, a male white student from Utah applied. His scores were below par but they didn't have any applicants from Utah that year so they thought he would contribute to a good mix. So he got in. Some other person, maybe even a minority, with a higher score didn't get in because of this guy. |
Um, that is why it was in quotation marks. His father had a way of bringing up some vague skirmish (lie) to make his like seem more interesting. |
Does anyone have the breakdown of the scores? Did he lose most of his points in the writing section? If so, that might be why they did not care. |
Affirmative action for people from Utah! |
I find that very hard to believe. |
What are they really looking for? Seems like the kids with the money can all manufacture the "right" experiences to get them into the "right" college, along with all the other privileged kids doing the same things. Spending $$$$$$ to go to prep school, hire tutors, hire test prep experts, hire a team to help with their college applications, going to third world countries during the summers to do their humanitarian charity work, starting charities to help poor people, be involved in tons of extra curricula activities, etc. What have we not seen before? |
Because that's the only preference that's racist. |
Yes, maybe even! I was the pp who wrote about the Stanford applicants. The one who got in with the low scores who played sports was from UTAH!! Also, I met a Harvard student from this area who said that at Harvard, there were many students who struggled with courses that he found to be easy. Most were white and from remote areas of the country in the South and Midwest. |
| Hey PP and the other two reasons are bullshit. I came from a working class family, so I never would've have had the options for 2 and 3. But that's okay because it is not racist? Why can't you folks cop to how legacy admits are discriminatory to folks who have not had those opportunities. |
Maybe they did have other applicants from Utah but they were largely female or upper class Mormons, and this guy that got in was middle class. |
Saw a program where a white girl from a poor, rural background graduated as the class valedictorian and went to a good school. Think she dropped out because she couldn't handle the workload. She got great grades in high school and was doing competitive and rigorous work compared to her classmates but it wasn't on the level it needed to be for her to be on the same level as when she went to college. |
Maybe that's it...maybe the univ see past all the manufactured stuff and look at the "real" person and the "real" experiences. So many parents now a days are trying to give their kids a competitive edge by sending their kids to prep class and tutors. It's becoming common, at least around here. Maybe they can tell between who's really intelligent and will make great leaders vs those that are because of the tutors and prep classes. Maybe some of the kids that seem to have the right "resume" (test scores, AP/IB, what have you) aren't that smart on their own and cant' hack it in top Univ when left to their own devices. Just a thought. |
You are spot on. I would put my bets on a kid who never studied more than 3 hours a night and lived on a farm in Texas with a 2250 than a kid whose parents are doctors in Bethesda who got prepped and sent to NCS with a score of 2350 any day. |
"Racist" doesn't mean what you think it means. But even if it did, is racism the only "ism" to talk about? |
Not first in his family to attend and graduate from college. His parents are nurses. |