|
Except, before advocating the program be cut, find out the savings. Every kid being educated will require about 1/25th of a teacher, whether it be AAP or Base.
There is not a lot of extra cost for AAP: screening has some cost; tests will have to be done anyway. |
Or perhaps the truly gifted are, because their program is dumbed down by the not-really-so gifted.... LOL. |
Postal roads,parks, etc, are covered in the Constitution. Education is not. |
well then it would be a school... |
|
Since this is Va public schools, and education is a state/local matter, you are clearly have not researched the Virginia Constitution. Article VIII deals with education. Here is article VIII, section 1. Section 1. Public schools of high quality to be maintained. The General Assembly shall provide for a system of free public elementary and secondary schools for all children of school age throughout the Commonwealth, and shall seek to ensure that an educational program of high quality is established and continually maintained. So, go back into your tea bagger whole. |
Not the PP and definitely not a tea bagger, but I think we all know public education is a state/county matter and should be covered as such. The problem many of us have with AAP is that it is an 'extra' that benefits some, but not others. We resent having our already high taxes go toward programs like these, rather than toward General Education as a whole. If the program were truly for the highly gifted, i.e. a form of special education for kids who cannot learn in a standard classroom, that would be a different matter. However, I think we're all very aware that AAP is not that at all. |
|
I have a friend that relocated from FCPS to another area. Their oldest child was in AAP. In the new district (supposedly the best in the new area), that child did not qualify for the GT program. She was probably in the upper 10-15% of FCPS.
Now, in the base program, they are finding that the work is just busy work, while the teachers focus on the bottom children. The girl will pass the state exams, which is the goal of the school -- the teachers and school are evaluated based on how the lowest perform (No Child Left Behind) compared with the average or better kids. This is in a large university town. My DD, same age, still in AAP, is loving school. In her class, they can focus on learning. There is no doubt that the kids will pass the SOL's. I think that is the real reason for AAP for us, and why I fought. NCLB is a horrible law...requiring 100% passing means that the lower 10-20% take up the resources in general education. In AAP, there can be more differentiation.....the teachers can focus on all of the kids and not just a few. |
Glad your DD is loving school... but what about those kids who are in Gen Ed and could easily do AAP work? Are they getting shortchanged? Yes they are. |
| PP: I agree. I think any kid that can handle the workload and does not disrupt the class should be given the chance. The issue is not to isolate the top 3% for differentiated learning, but to allow all that can handle the accelerated pace the opportunity. |
| The solution is to take out kids who do not need to be mainstreamed into the average class. Go back to LD teachers who teach--not hang out as assistants in a Gen ed class. |
| That would be fine. Until that happens, I will fight to keep my kid in AAP |
+1 |
|
except that federal law requires children with learning disabilities to be provided a free appropriate public education in the MOST inclusive environment possible. So you can't remove ALL of the children with learning disabilities from mainstream classes. If they can make any progress in a mainstream class they have a right to be there.
The problem with the schools is not the diversity of the students' abilities, it's the standardize tests that pressure the teachers to focus on these lower 10% of the class at the expense of the rest of the class. If a child is not getting the curriculum, then they may need less inclusive options like being pulled out. If another student is gifted, then the teacher can recommend AAP placement if appropriate, or have the time to actually teach the averaget to above average children so they can reach the full potentiontial. With focus on standardize tests, even the children with LDs suffer, as they make "some progress," with a hyper focused teacher and dedicated aid so they don't get the additional services they need. Theabove average kids suffer because they don't get the same focus of the teachers, and may miss concepts they could easily grasp with a little instruction. |
You do know that there are LD child in in AAP too, right? |