Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess the issue is that there is a contract where Maret has the right to use it, and that contract still remains valid.
If a person has a rental agreement, they will continue have the right to decide who enters the apartment even thought they don’t live there. So I guess is a contractual issue.
Yes. Maret could end the contract.
Will Hardy reimburse Maret for the money spent on the field? My kid use that field all the time of club sports. It is the only field in NW that is maintained and has lights. Is Hardy going to maintain the property and keep it open in during non school hours and weekend? Will Hardy pay to get the field house renovated? That field has a lot more people using vs just Maret.
What will happen to the British School? They use the field a lot during the day. Why can’t Hardy just do a morning practice at the field if it is so important? Maret uses the field from 3:30 to 5:30. It is open the rest of the day.
Guess it is more fun to be outraged vs actually adjust a schedule and use the field?
The DC government--whether DPR or DCPS--should be responsible for paying for the maintenance, just like Guy Mason or Turtle Park or Jackson-Reed.
Maret's reimbursement for spending money was a decade of reserved usage. Oddly, though, that decade got extended for another decade.
Maret's BS line is "We only have the field for 0.02% of the year," as though having the field at 2am on a snowy Saturday night is useful to anyone.
Every school needs the same weekday, after school, Fall and Spring hours. (Gee, why doesn't Maret take the morning slot? They've got buses on-site, ready to drive kids.)
And to the "It's a DPR thing" person -- yes, if you want to reserve the field on Saturday or Sunday, that's a DPR permitting issue. But the weekday, after school hours are not available for permitting.