DOJ releases Trump Epstein sexual abuse allegations; dont let them bury this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

What are you getting out of the Trump administration that makes you so go to these lengths to defend him?

Genuinely curious. There is no politician in the world I would defend so uncritically.

What makes you believe every salacious claim called in to tip lines?

What makes you believe Trump...ever?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

this ww3 to distract

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

Nobody here is talking about the tapes or dossier but you. It's just weird deflection.

Nope. It’s just more examples of the same behaviors. Another poster here was right - there is zero critical thinking with you people. Unless, of course, it’s Biden being accused. In that case, the same people *immediately* called his accuser a fraud and a liar and refused to even entertain the possibility that maybe the allegation was true.

No, it's same poster here defending Trump on blind faith in their messiah.

You can’t even rebut anything that was said. Instead, you have to go to your usual dumb “messiah” retorts. So typical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

Gladly. And I want Trump investigated and to testify under oath as well. It's way overdue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

Bondi needs to get on that.
But she seems to feel that the DOJ has no role here. What do you make of that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

Yes, agreed. And we all look forward to Trump's deposition in January 2029.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times. [/quote

I'm sure you are a good little christian defending your corrupt god dumpy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

Yes, agreed. And we all look forward to Trump's deposition in January 2029.

Discovery will be a hoot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

DP. Here we go again. The people who thought it would be a great idea to use Kavanaugh’s HIGH SCHOOL yearbook as evidence of… something… are now believing a the fabrications of a mentally disturbed person. How typical.

As opposed to the daily fabrications of Trump. He lies incessantly, bragged about going into teenage locker rooms, said he'd grab women by the you know what...but nah, this time he's innocent, I promise.

MAGAs are either truly this stupid or just as gross as those in the files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

Trump first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

What are you getting out of the Trump administration that makes you so go to these lengths to defend him?

Genuinely curious. There is no politician in the world I would defend so uncritically.

What makes you believe every salacious claim called in to tip lines?

What makes you believe Trump...ever?

Yep, they took a look at all the available information out in the universe, Trump’s past history, all of the accusations, and said to themselves… Yes, I should believe the pathological liar and convicted rapist

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

What are you getting out of the Trump administration that makes you so go to these lengths to defend him?

Genuinely curious. There is no politician in the world I would defend so uncritically.

What makes you believe every salacious claim called in to tip lines?

What makes you believe Trump...ever?

Yep, they took a look at all the available information out in the universe, Trump’s past history, all of the accusations, and said to themselves… Yes, I should believe the pathological liar and convicted rapist

There's really no getting through to people who think Jesus anointed a rapist to start WWIII. Save your energy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

Gladly. And I want Trump investigated and to testify under oath as well. It's way overdue.

And don't forget Melania. She knew Epstein well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

Instead, you're blindly defending an obvious liar and sexual deviant.

Wanting to know if a story is actually true or not has nothing to do with blindly defending anyone. I don’t subscribe to your weird sense of vigilante justice, but YDY.

Yet here you are defending him as if all of the investigations have been conducted and he has been fully exonerated.

I look forward to an investigation of this woman. Put her on the stand under oath.

Gladly. And I want Trump investigated and to testify under oath as well. It's way overdue.

And don't forget Melania. She knew Epstein well.

Yup. There are many others who need to testify under oath.