DOJ releases Trump Epstein sexual abuse allegations; dont let them bury this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MAGA doesn’t care.

+100 republicans will hold Trump in higher esteem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

IF Trump's only defense is "well biden knew and didn't know anything about it." he doesn't have much of a defense at all.

And if they investigate, you would be screaming that it must be credible because they are investigating.

Uhm, what??? Of course, they should investigate. The fact that they haven't doesn't exonerate Trump anymore than it convicts him if they investigate. The ONLY way to get to the bottom of this is to properly investigate.

What makes you think they didn’t investigate?

If they did, why would they be trying so unbelievably hard to cover it up and protect Trump? Why haven't they released all of the files? Why are the files illegally redacted?

[Anonymous]

We don't know that it didn't happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

Ah yes, the resident pedo apologist. I believe the victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

You don't know one way or the other. But you're oddly defensive about it. I mean if you're going to say this is crying wolf, how many obvious lies do we hear Trump speak every single day? Why would this be any different?

[Anonymous]

I heard on ABC this morning that there was no evidence of any communication between Trump and Epstein in the years surrounding the time of the alleged assault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

Trump can speak to it when he sits for subpoena in January 2029. We'll likely have to wait until then to learn more, unfortunately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

And Trump's been convicted of sexual assault and was best friends with Epstein for an extended period of time. What's that make Trump sound like?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

There's a difference betwe physical evidence and someone's story.

How much evidence do you think a rich adult is going to leave behind when he sexually assaults a 13 year old?

Be realistic, instead of loyal to the mistake you put in power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard on ABC this morning that there was no evidence of any communication between Trump and Epstein in the years surrounding the time of the alleged assault.

What evidence would there be? This was before email. They don’t have phone records.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

Those allegations were, in fact, women.