DOJ releases Trump Epstein sexual abuse allegations; dont let them bury this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

MAGA influencers are so obvious in their attempts to distract and tell us the sky is actually polka dot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

And Trump's been convicted of sexual assault and was best friends with Epstein for an extended period of time. What's that make Trump sound like?

You know what?
I don’t give a damn. The whole E Jean Carroll trial was a farce and nothing more than an attempt to prevent Trump from becoming president again. You see how well that worked.
And the reality is a lot of powerful people were friends with Epstein. Not all of them called the Palm Beach police to report on Epstein and Maxwell. And many of them (Clintons) remained friends with Maxwell after the truth came out. And then there is Stacey Plaskett who not only took campaign contributions from Epstein, but communicated with him during a hearing to try to take down Trump.

So. I don’t care what you try to throw at him. We know better.

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

What are you getting out of the Trump administration that makes you so go to these lengths to defend him?

Genuinely curious. There is no politician in the world I would defend so uncritically.

What makes you believe every salacious claim called in to tip lines?

What makes you believe Trump...ever?

Yep, they took a look at all the available information out in the universe, Trump’s past history, all of the accusations, and said to themselves… Yes, I should believe the pathological liar and convicted rapist

There's really no getting through to people who think Jesus anointed a rapist to start WWIII. Save your energy.

This

[Anonymous]

Then there is this from the attorney for many of Epstein’s victims, Bradley Edwards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

+1
It’s clear there are other, just as disturbed people on this thread who fall for fake news over and over again. Anything salacious and over the top always grabs their attention, no matter how absurd. These are the dimwits who actually believe Epstein et al were eating infants.

Trump's a serial liar. No reason to believe anything he says with regard to his innocence in this matter. If you do, you're just a willing moron.

Says the moron who is more than willing to believe they were eating babies after having orgies with 13 yos. Oh, the irony.

??? You're trying way too hard. Not sure why you're so committed to defending this guy.

You mean, you don’t understand why I would take any and all unverified claims and run with them, no matter how sensationalist or obviously made up - like you do? Anything to get Trump, amirite? I take obviously made up nonsense with a big grain of salt. Too bad you don’t.

MAGA influencers are so obvious in their attempts to distract and tell us the sky is actually polka dot.

God, you’re tiresome. I’m not “MAGA.” Grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

DP. Here we go again. The people who thought it would be a great idea to use Kavanaugh’s HIGH SCHOOL yearbook as evidence of… something… are now believing a the fabrications of a mentally disturbed person. How typical.

As opposed to the daily fabrications of Trump. He lies incessantly, bragged about going into teenage locker rooms, said he'd grab women by the you know what...but nah, this time he's innocent, I promise.

MAGAs are either truly this stupid or just as gross as those in the files.

Hate to burst your airtight bubble of delusion, but the vast majority of men named in the Epstein files are Democrats or Democratic donors. Sorry, I know that’s disappointing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

DP. Here we go again. The people who thought it would be a great idea to use Kavanaugh’s HIGH SCHOOL yearbook as evidence of… something… are now believing a the fabrications of a mentally disturbed person. How typical.

As opposed to the daily fabrications of Trump. He lies incessantly, bragged about going into teenage locker rooms, said he'd grab women by the you know what...but nah, this time he's innocent, I promise.

MAGAs are either truly this stupid or just as gross as those in the files.

Hate to burst your airtight bubble of delusion, but the vast majority of men named in the Epstein files are Democrats or Democratic donors. Sorry, I know that’s disappointing.

Not really. Thoroughly investigate them all, including Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

What are you getting out of the Trump administration that makes you so go to these lengths to defend him?

Genuinely curious. There is no politician in the world I would defend so uncritically.

What makes you believe every salacious claim called in to tip lines?

What makes you believe Trump...ever?

Yep, they took a look at all the available information out in the universe, Trump’s past history, all of the accusations, and said to themselves… Yes, I should believe the pathological liar and convicted rapist

There's really no getting through to people who think Jesus anointed a rapist to start WWIII. Save your energy.

This

You people are bizarre. I have no idea what that’s even supposed to mean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Then there is this from the attorney for many of Epstein’s victims, Bradley Edwards.

Ssh. These conspiracy theorists can’t be bothered with inconvenient facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

What are you getting out of the Trump administration that makes you so go to these lengths to defend him?

Genuinely curious. There is no politician in the world I would defend so uncritically.

What makes you believe every salacious claim called in to tip lines?

What makes you believe Trump...ever?

Yep, they took a look at all the available information out in the universe, Trump’s past history, all of the accusations, and said to themselves… Yes, I should believe the pathological liar and convicted rapist

There's really no getting through to people who think Jesus anointed a rapist to start WWIII. Save your energy.

This

You people are bizarre. I have no idea what that’s even supposed to mean.

If you don't follow the news, how is anybody expected to take you seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

DP. Here we go again. The people who thought it would be a great idea to use Kavanaugh’s HIGH SCHOOL yearbook as evidence of… something… are now believing a the fabrications of a mentally disturbed person. How typical.

As opposed to the daily fabrications of Trump. He lies incessantly, bragged about going into teenage locker rooms, said he'd grab women by the you know what...but nah, this time he's innocent, I promise.

MAGAs are either truly this stupid or just as gross as those in the files.

Hate to burst your airtight bubble of delusion, but the vast majority of men named in the Epstein files are Democrats or Democratic donors. Sorry, I know that’s disappointing.

It is disappointing that so many men were able to abuse and rape children and girls. Not disappointed at all that they are being investigated and facing accountability. See the difference between MAGA and us is that we aren't protecting ANY of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

DP. Here we go again. The people who thought it would be a great idea to use Kavanaugh’s HIGH SCHOOL yearbook as evidence of… something… are now believing a the fabrications of a mentally disturbed person. How typical.

As opposed to the daily fabrications of Trump. He lies incessantly, bragged about going into teenage locker rooms, said he'd grab women by the you know what...but nah, this time he's innocent, I promise.

MAGAs are either truly this stupid or just as gross as those in the files.

Hate to burst your airtight bubble of delusion, but the vast majority of men named in the Epstein files are Democrats or Democratic donors. Sorry, I know that’s disappointing.

Lmao…ok, let pretend that you are right.

But, we’d better release those files and get those darned evil Democrats! We’ve got them now! Release them all and Trump can testify under oath bout how bad they are!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

DP. Shall we discuss your belief in nonexistent “pee pee tapes”? And a ludicrous Russian “dossier” on Trump?

And you are the people who dismissed a sexual assault accusation against Biden as made up by a “mentally unwell woman.” It’s no wonder no one takes you seriously at this point.

Many, many people take this seriously. If you believe anything Trump says, you're hopelessly naive or just spreading disinformation for some weird reason.

Yes, and “many, many” people/idiots believed the pee pee tapes and dossier BS above. Yet here you are lecturing the rest of us on being “hopelessly naive and spreading disinformation.” Take a look in the mirror.

What are you getting out of the Trump administration that makes you so go to these lengths to defend him?

Genuinely curious. There is no politician in the world I would defend so uncritically.

What makes you believe every salacious claim called in to tip lines?

What makes you believe Trump...ever?

Yep, they took a look at all the available information out in the universe, Trump’s past history, all of the accusations, and said to themselves… Yes, I should believe the pathological liar and convicted rapist

There's really no getting through to people who think Jesus anointed a rapist to start WWIII. Save your energy.

This

You people are bizarre. I have no idea what that’s even supposed to mean.

First day on internet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

DP. Here we go again. The people who thought it would be a great idea to use Kavanaugh’s HIGH SCHOOL yearbook as evidence of… something… are now believing a the fabrications of a mentally disturbed person. How typical.

As opposed to the daily fabrications of Trump. He lies incessantly, bragged about going into teenage locker rooms, said he'd grab women by the you know what...but nah, this time he's innocent, I promise.

MAGAs are either truly this stupid or just as gross as those in the files.

Hate to burst your airtight bubble of delusion, but the vast majority of men named in the Epstein files are Democrats or Democratic donors. Sorry, I know that’s disappointing.

It is disappointing that so many men were able to abuse and rape children and girls. Not disappointed at all that they are being investigated and facing accountability. See the difference between MAGA and us is that we aren't protecting ANY of them.

Neither am I. I am saying to put any accusers on the stand and have them testify under oath rather than just taking the word of anyone with a “tip.” See the difference?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Well, let’s think critically about this, then. Trump has a long, well documented history of problematic statements and behaviors around underage girls. Many survivors have come forward. A random woman has nothing to gain, and everything in the world to lose, from making sexual allegations against a wealthy global organized crime network with an army of lawyers, judges, and fanatical armed supporters at their disposal.

What does she get out of it that balances out the death threats against herself and her family, her name and sexual past being dragged through the mud, the headaches, the legal expenses, the countersuits, the threat of financial ruin, having to go into hiding because the other side portrays you as crazy and a liar? The only answer that makes sense is something priceless: justice.

There would have to be an even bigger and wealthier and more secret conspiracy for all of these women to be mere paid agitators or fame-seekers.

The gain for the woman would be the notriety of taking down a hated sitting President. There's plenty of opportunity for financial gain.

From who?

And no, this testimony by itself isn’t going to take down a sitting president unless Congress decides to act. You’re giving the victims far too much credit.