DOJ releases Trump Epstein sexual abuse allegations; dont let them bury this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Well, let’s think critically about this, then. Trump has a long, well documented history of problematic statements and behaviors around underage girls. Many survivors have come forward. A random woman has nothing to gain, and everything in the world to lose, from making sexual allegations against a wealthy global organized crime network with an army of lawyers, judges, and fanatical armed supporters at their disposal.

What does she get out of it that balances out the death threats against herself and her family, her name and sexual past being dragged through the mud, the headaches, the legal expenses, the countersuits, the threat of financial ruin, having to go into hiding because the other side portrays you as crazy and a liar? The only answer that makes sense is something priceless: justice.

There would have to be an even bigger and wealthier and more secret conspiracy for all of these women to be mere paid agitators or fame-seekers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

There's a difference betwe physical evidence and someone's story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Well, let’s think critically about this, then. Trump has a long, well documented history of problematic statements and behaviors around underage girls. Many survivors have come forward. A random woman has nothing to gain, and everything in the world to lose, from making sexual allegations against a wealthy global organized crime network with an army of lawyers, judges, and fanatical armed supporters at their disposal.

What does she get out of it that balances out the death threats against herself and her family, her name and sexual past being dragged through the mud, the headaches, the legal expenses, the countersuits, the threat of financial ruin, having to go into hiding because the other side portrays you as crazy and a liar? The only answer that makes sense is something priceless: justice.

There would have to be an even bigger and wealthier and more secret conspiracy for all of these women to be mere paid agitators or fame-seekers.

The gain for the woman would be the notriety of taking down a hated sitting President. There's plenty of opportunity for financial gain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Image:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

If she really "bit the hell out of it," can't they check for a mark or a scar? Didn't they do that with Michael Jackson? Let's see that mushroom. Then we don't have to wonder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

IF Trump's only defense is "well biden knew and didn't know anything about it." he doesn't have much of a defense at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

IF Trump's only defense is "well biden knew and didn't know anything about it." he doesn't have much of a defense at all.

And if they investigate, you would be screaming that it must be credible because they are investigating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

IF Trump's only defense is "well biden knew and didn't know anything about it." he doesn't have much of a defense at all.

And if they investigate, you would be screaming that it must be credible because they are investigating.

Uhm, what??? Of course, they should investigate. The fact that they haven't doesn't exonerate Trump anymore than it convicts him if they investigate. The ONLY way to get to the bottom of this is to properly investigate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

IF Trump's only defense is "well biden knew and didn't know anything about it." he doesn't have much of a defense at all.

And if they investigate, you would be screaming that it must be credible because they are investigating.

He’ll be able to discuss it himself when he sits for subpoena in January 2029.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

The same critical thinkers who went berserk over the Hunter Biden laptop?

or were convinced there was a satanic pedo cabal in the basement of a pizza parlor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

IF Trump's only defense is "well biden knew and didn't know anything about it." he doesn't have much of a defense at all.

And if they investigate, you would be screaming that it must be credible because they are investigating.

Uhm, what??? Of course, they should investigate. The fact that they haven't doesn't exonerate Trump anymore than it convicts him if they investigate. The ONLY way to get to the bottom of this is to properly investigate.

What makes you think they didn’t investigate?