Talarico or Crockett?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

+1

Insanity is color-blind.

[Anonymous]

Turnout for the primary on Tuesday in Texas is 🤪

[Anonymous]

Anyone who is following closely have predictions for this week?

Even though I think the Democrats would have a better chance against Paxton, I really hope in the name of common decency that Cornyn wins. I like both Talarico and Crockett but statewide Talarico has to be the a better choice overall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

+1

Insanity is color-blind.

Intelligent women really scare you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

+1

Insanity is color-blind.

Intelligent women really scare you.

New poster. Intelligent women don't scare me and I really like Crockett. But I don't trust average Texan voters. They might be turned off by Paxton because he is a corrupt liar but they also might be turned off by Crockett's style. Candidates who win in primaries don't necessarily have the best chance in a general election and I understand why voters think ahead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

[Anonymous]

Crockett 51% Talarico 49%

You're welcome

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

+1

Insanity is color-blind.

Intelligent women really scare you.

Crockett really scares the maga incels.

[Anonymous]

NP: Crockett is Israel First. Her campaign has a lot of dark money from them.

[Anonymous]

I’m PP. I’m a die hard Dem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

+1

Insanity is color-blind.

Intelligent women really scare you.

Crockett really scares the maga incels.

Are you kidding? Crockett is MAGA’s preferred candidate by a million miles.

She’s got a snowball’s chance of winning the general and she’s easy for racists to caricature.

[Anonymous]

Talarico Will win b t 5-10 points

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

+1

Insanity is color-blind.

Intelligent women really scare you.

Crockett really scares the maga incels.

Are you kidding? Crockett is MAGA’s preferred candidate by a million miles.

She’s got a snowball’s chance of winning the general and she’s easy for racists to caricature.

I also think the more grassroots candidates scare lobbying groups. The ROI is dropping for buying politicians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

It’s because she’s insane.

She is very smart