Talarico or Crockett?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

You do know that CBS nor the FCC prevented the airing of the interview. Seems as if Colbert has a preferred candidate and didn’t want anything to get in the way. Both Colbert and Talarico are lying.

You raised money off of lies, and have the audacity to continue pushing those lies.

CBS didn't even tell The Late Show that they couldn't air your interview.

They simply offered legal guidance for how Stephen Colbert could provide equal airtime to the other DEMOCRAT candidates who you are running against.

The FCC was never involved at any point.

You and Colbert seem to have colluded and worked together to push a false narrative to help you gain popularity instead of bothering to give the other candidates equal airtime.

It says a lot about how disingenuous and disgusting you guys are.

Colbert has had Crockett on the show multiple times, and CBS lawyers advised him that he shouldn’t have Talarico on despite the equal time doctrine not really being enforced for decades. Stop trying to make this about Democratic infighting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

Talarico is FAR from the model Christian. He has no business telling others how to behave. And he wasn’t censored.

Nice try delulu. I’m abstaining from using the outdated Republican acronym. When is Lent anyway?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

Talarico is FAR from the model Christian. He has no business telling others how to behave. And he wasn’t censored.

Hahahahahaha

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

This reminds me of when the Catholic Church used to ban movies. In the 1970s, The Life of Brian became a worldwide box-office hit after the church forbade Catholics to see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

You do know that CBS nor the FCC prevented the airing of the interview. Seems as if Colbert has a preferred candidate and didn’t want anything to get in the way. Both Colbert and Talarico are lying.

You raised money off of lies, and have the audacity to continue pushing those lies.

CBS didn't even tell The Late Show that they couldn't air your interview.

They simply offered legal guidance for how Stephen Colbert could provide equal airtime to the other DEMOCRAT candidates who you are running against.

The FCC was never involved at any point.

You and Colbert seem to have colluded and worked together to push a false narrative to help you gain popularity instead of bothering to give the other candidates equal airtime.

It says a lot about how disingenuous and disgusting you guys are.

This says a lot about disingenuous and disgusting YOU are.

You and your cronies seem to have colluded and worked together to push a false narrative ... what a sheep you are. Jasmine Crockett has been on Colbert twice. If you bothered to even listen to his response, much less do a little research, you'd know this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

Talarico is FAR from the model Christian. He has no business telling others how to behave. And he wasn’t censored.

But Ken Serial Adulterer Paxton is a model MAGA Christian. Go figure. 🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

This. I like them both, but he is a force when it comes to combatting Christian Nationalism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

You do know that CBS nor the FCC prevented the airing of the interview. Seems as if Colbert has a preferred candidate and didn’t want anything to get in the way. Both Colbert and Talarico are lying.

You raised money off of lies, and have the audacity to continue pushing those lies.

CBS didn't even tell The Late Show that they couldn't air your interview.

They simply offered legal guidance for how Stephen Colbert could provide equal airtime to the other DEMOCRAT candidates who you are running against.

The FCC was never involved at any point.

You and Colbert seem to have colluded and worked together to push a false narrative to help you gain popularity instead of bothering to give the other candidates equal airtime.

It says a lot about how disingenuous and disgusting you guys are.

You actually believe this? Did you forget that Paramount needs FCC approval to buy Warner Brothers. They will do anything to capitulate. I am stunned that you believe anything Bari Weiss says. Wow. I guess she also didn't pull the 60 minutes episode. It was a mistake

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

You do know that CBS nor the FCC prevented the airing of the interview. Seems as if Colbert has a preferred candidate and didn’t want anything to get in the way. Both Colbert and Talarico are lying.

You raised money off of lies, and have the audacity to continue pushing those lies.

CBS didn't even tell The Late Show that they couldn't air your interview.

They simply offered legal guidance for how Stephen Colbert could provide equal airtime to the other DEMOCRAT candidates who you are running against.

The FCC was never involved at any point.

You and Colbert seem to have colluded and worked together to push a false narrative to help you gain popularity instead of bothering to give the other candidates equal airtime.

It says a lot about how disingenuous and disgusting you guys are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

Captain Obvious has entered the chat.

Np
Joining Captain dum dum

Obviously this PP was sarcasm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Talarico is going to have a much easier time flipping Texas. I think he has a real shot in this cycle.

I like Crockett, but she is not winning Texas even against Paxton.

+1. Crockett is great, but she's a black woman. In Texas. Paxton can dog whistle her to death. Talarico may not be able to win over Paxton, but he could come close. And if Crockett loses the primary but then campaigns for him to turn out what would have been her votes, he may win.

Latinos are much more likely to vote for Talarico and against Paxton based on his association with Trump. I don't think Crockett will get as much traction.

[Anonymous]

Talarico is a rare America first candidate and has explicitly pledged not to take money from corporate PACs, which includes AIPAC. He frequently cites AIPAC as an example of "big money" that he believes distorts American foreign policy. He has called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and supports conditioning military aid to Israel—positions that are diametrically opposed to AIPAC’s platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

Talarico is FAR from the model Christian. He has no business telling others how to behave. And he wasn’t censored.

Well lucky for him that being perfect is not a requirement for salvation by grace.

That said from a role model standpoint I’d rather my sons grow up to be like him than Paxton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

You do know that CBS nor the FCC prevented the airing of the interview. Seems as if Colbert has a preferred candidate and didn’t want anything to get in the way. Both Colbert and Talarico are lying.

You raised money off of lies, and have the audacity to continue pushing those lies.

CBS didn't even tell The Late Show that they couldn't air your interview.

They simply offered legal guidance for how Stephen Colbert could provide equal airtime to the other DEMOCRAT candidates who you are running against.

The FCC was never involved at any point.

You and Colbert seem to have colluded and worked together to push a false narrative to help you gain popularity instead of bothering to give the other candidates equal airtime.

It says a lot about how disingenuous and disgusting you guys are.

95% of funds raised in modern day American politics are raised off of lies or half-truths. This is a drop in a big bucket of dirty money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

Talarico is FAR from the model Christian. He has no business telling others how to behave. And he wasn’t censored.

Nice try delulu. I’m abstaining from using the outdated Republican acronym. When is Lent anyway?

It just started.