Talarico or Crockett?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

You obviously haven't been paying attention to DCUM, where Talarico had more name recognition than Stephen A. Smith.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

Captain Obvious has entered the chat.

[Anonymous]

Paxton is going to win. Texas likes adulterers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

You obviously haven't been paying attention to DCUM, where Talarico had more name recognition than Stephen A. Smith.

Stephen A Who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

Streisand Effect

Well done!

[Anonymous]

Paxton is such a POS dirtbag sleazebag, do not understand anyone voting for him.

[Anonymous]

I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

I love Talarico the Baptist white boy taking it to the ChristoFascists and explaining how horribly they have twisted Christ's teachings. Go boy go! Have no idea if he could win a general election in TX but I think he would have a better chance in than Crockett.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

Streisand Effect

Well done!

Shhhh no one tell them this is a thing

[Anonymous]

I like both, but not sure why Talarico is favored more than Crockett though. If Beto or Colin Alred couldn't win in Texas, I'm not sure how Talarico is much different? Plus, could definitely see Crockett reading Paxton to filth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK?

No, she’s a low IQ individual according to Trump. Lol he’s such a fantastic troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Until the Colbert show, I had no idea of who Talarico was. Do thanks to the CBS morons Talarico now has world wide name recognition!

he raised 2.5 million since this!

You do know that CBS nor the FCC prevented the airing of the interview. Seems as if Colbert has a preferred candidate and didn’t want anything to get in the way. Both Colbert and Talarico are lying.

You raised money off of lies, and have the audacity to continue pushing those lies.

CBS didn't even tell The Late Show that they couldn't air your interview.

They simply offered legal guidance for how Stephen Colbert could provide equal airtime to the other DEMOCRAT candidates who you are running against.

The FCC was never involved at any point.

You and Colbert seem to have colluded and worked together to push a false narrative to help you gain popularity instead of bothering to give the other candidates equal airtime.

It says a lot about how disingenuous and disgusting you guys are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like both of them, too, but think we NEED Talarico's voice in the Senate more at the moment. I think a Christian telling the Christian nationalists that they are not behaving like Christians will be much more effective than any of our other strategies at the moment.

I also think being censored by CBS is going to help him.

Talarico is FAR from the model Christian. He has no business telling others how to behave. And he wasn’t censored.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech

Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.

Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.

Texas isn't going blue any time soon.

Texas was blue as recently as the nineties. I wouldn’t be so sure.

[Anonymous]

Knives are out for Talarico.
Clearly MAGA thinks he’s the threat here.