Why are younger women so left wing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

Imagine have zero understanding of biology and women’s bodies.

DP.

Men can have children too you know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

Lots of MAGAs are advocating for legally murdering their children by refusing vaccines and gun control and other things that save childrens' lives. Not much of a leg to stand on there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

Imagine have zero understanding of biology and women’s bodies.

DP.

Men can have children too you know.

True. I have been a dog breeder for many years and I've found that the boy dogs give birth to as many healthy and hearty litters as the girl dogs do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

Imagine have zero understanding of biology and women’s bodies.

DP.

Men can have children too you know.

🙄

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.

Historically men have been more left wing than women.

Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.

Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.

Came here to say that. There's something to it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

Even if you consider elective abortion murder, I believe that if you care about women you should still support a D&C if there is a miscarriage.
If there is a choice to be made between the two lives (baby and mother) the mother should be allowed to choose her own.

The fact that Roe V Wade was overturned means that women have died because they are no longer allowed to remove the fetus until a heartbeat is gone, even if that fetus cannot survive outside the womb.

Because Roe V Wade was overturned, uneducated predominantly male legislators have made laws that have killed women.

It's become clear that women's live matter not one bit in our society.

Can you see how this could make women vote against the party that unleashed this on us?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.

Historically men have been more left wing than women.

Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.

Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.

So by this logic, this liberal married mom should not care about vulnerable groups outside my family. Yet somehow I still do.

Gonna say your logic here is not on the mark

Do you attend religious services regularly?

So being filled with God's love and following Jesus' teaching makes one less likely to care about vulnerable populations? Hm.

The loss of religiosity has pushed people to be more emotionally attached to their political beliefs.

This is true for both sexes and both political parties.

Women are just more inclined to choose Democrats because they emphasize caring for the “oppressed” which a very feminine instinct; although statistically religious women of all races tend to be less Democratic leaning. Clearly they do exist however as the PP opined.

Kindly shut up

Oooh someone’s triggered.

No intelligent people just think you are a moron.

Being intelligent is like being rich - only the fakers announce their status.

that's how I feel about "Christians" these days

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sad that being kind and compassionate needs to be defined at all.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

You mean clump of unformed cells.

NP. No: genetically unique fetal human offspring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

Lots of MAGAs are advocating for legally murdering their children by refusing vaccines and gun control and other things that save childrens' lives. Not much of a leg to stand on there.

yup and what about the real Epstein files....MAGA seems good with keeping the truth hidden about the rape and murder of children in those. Could it be that the "pro-lifers" really don't care about women or children...but they sure do like the control don't they.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course young women are radicalized - all around them they see their peers being sexually harassed, raped and murdered by men who far too often get away with it. And now that they are drawing closer to education and pay parity with men, they see this disgusting wave of fanatical misogyny unfolding in the online space where men whine about being held accountable and not having entitlement to women’s bodies in all imaginable ways.

Opposing rape is "radical" now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.

Historically men have been more left wing than women.

Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.

Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.

Came here to say that. There's something to it!

Look at Christianity, whole theme of sex abuse and cover up. Just recently, a whole new exposure of abuse in the Assemblies of God church published a couple months ago, similar to that of the Catholic church. Some men with serious Christian beliefs seem prone to enjoy subjugating others. It is definitely repulsive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.

Historically men have been more left wing than women.

Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.

Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.

So by this logic, this liberal married mom should not care about vulnerable groups outside my family. Yet somehow I still do.

Gonna say your logic here is not on the mark

Do you attend religious services regularly?

So being filled with God's love and following Jesus' teaching makes one less likely to care about vulnerable populations? Hm.

The loss of religiosity has pushed people to be more emotionally attached to their political beliefs.

This is true for both sexes and both political parties.

Women are just more inclined to choose Democrats because they emphasize caring for the “oppressed” which a very feminine instinct; although statistically religious women of all races tend to be less Democratic leaning. Clearly they do exist however as the PP opined.

Kindly shut up

Oooh someone’s triggered.

No intelligent people just think you are a moron.

Being intelligent is like being rich - only the fakers announce their status.

that's how I feel about "Christians" these days

And Jews and Muslims too. All fake

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.

Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….

Lots of MAGAs are advocating for legally murdering their children by refusing vaccines and gun control and other things that save childrens' lives. Not much of a leg to stand on there.

Yes, declining the flu shot is the same thing as abortion. The science has spoken.

[Anonymous]

Republicans are the ones sentencing women with miscarriages to death.They're fine with incest, rape, children of rape, forcing children to carry their rapist babies. Fine with death threats to anyone that disagrees with their king. Fine with talk of gassing people. Fake ass pro-lifers. Fake ass Christians doing the devils work.