Is there any difference in terms of brand quality between T10 ivy and T10 non-ivy?

[Anonymous]

And for CS (world rankings) https://csrankings.org/#/fromyear/2020/toyear/2025/index?all&world

[Anonymous]

Companies don't recruit universities, they recruit students. There are probably 20 better UVA candidates than Yale candidates for a specific job. That Yale degree in gender studies won't matter.

[Anonymous]

Yeah I am hoping any HR dad or mom here comments on this as well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah I am hoping any HR dad or mom here comments on this as well

Probably better to hear from people who actually understand the complex economy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Companies don't recruit universities, they recruit students. There are probably 20 better UVA candidates than Yale candidates for a specific job. That Yale degree in gender studies won't matter.

yet Yale and other ivies/T10 have better job outcomes over UVA, across sectors

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

depends: Stanford MIT are on par or better than the four ivies(HPPY) in the T10, .Northwestern and JHU are not. Chicago is not. Caltech is too different to compare to any of these schools.

That might be true. But each non-T5 has something really strong to offer. Pick the one that suits you best. Of course all T10 are in general all around strong.

Penn: Wharton
Northwestern: Journalism/Communication
JHU: Medicine
Chicago: Econ

[Anonymous]

So essentially it is still about the majors not the schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do you care about brand?

+1 these posters know nothing about college education. They're shopping for the best tennis shoe brand. It's tedious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Companies don't recruit universities, they recruit students. There are probably 20 better UVA candidates than Yale candidates for a specific job. That Yale degree in gender studies won't matter.

yet Yale and other ivies/T10 have better job outcomes over UVA, across sectors

Are you sure about that? What is a "better job" for any given person?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MIT and Stanford are the most important schools in America. There's no reasonable debate about that.

And Duke, Chicago, CalTech, Northwestern, Rice, Vanderbilt, and Johns Hopkins are all just as good as the 8 schools in the Ivy league. It's some very fine parsing to distinguish them from the Ivy schools. Different vibes. But qualitatively no different and often better - especially in STEM. Only Cornell and Princeton are really competing there. The Ivy schools will always have the benefit of history. But that matters less and less.

If you are going to talk about T20 rather than limiting to T10, then Georgetown, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame are on the table too.

lol someone's feeling got hurt.

No, why include Vandy and Rice but not these schools. That doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous]

Should Columbia be considered a T10 school? Or not sure?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So essentially it is still about the majors not the schools.

Does it make sense to go to Harvard over MIT or CMU for a career in tech?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

depends: Stanford MIT are on par or better than the four ivies(HPPY) in the T10, .Northwestern and JHU are not. Chicago is not. Caltech is too different to compare to any of these schools.

LOL ! You really need to get out more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Should Columbia be considered a T10 school? Or not sure?

of course not. columbia was never T10 they were inflated from lies rigging the rankings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this thread reeks of idiot parents who are justifying overpaying for brand names.
im what they would call ultra high networth. there is no universe i would pay for a dartmouth or brown over schools better equipped for the current transformation that has been taking place this decade plus.

Genuine question. What schools would you pay for or which schools do you think are better equipped for the current transformation?

I have the same questions. There’s not enough quantifiable evaluation of outcomes or impact from these schools. I really hope to see more objective measures to assess the value of a college education—forget the meaningless bragging rights that parents often focus on. Not everyone cares about LV bags

stanford, mit, princeton have the highest starting salaries and employment rates and it is not a coincidence.

Some of it has to do with where their graduates end up. Stanford---SV is one of the most expensive places to live and salaries are commensurate. MIT---Boston is also ridiculously priced, higher salaries abound.
Princeton--likely to end up in NYC.

Take that away and then let me know how much higher it really is