|
this thread reeks of idiot parents who are justifying overpaying for brand names.
im what they would call ultra high networth. there is no universe i would pay for a dartmouth or brown over schools better equipped for the current transformation that has been taking place this decade plus. |
Got it. If the self-proclaimed ultra high net worth says so, it must be true. |
All good. I’ll stick to my non ivy in palo alto. |
Genuine question. What schools would you pay for or which schools do you think are better equipped for the current transformation? |
I have the same questions. There’s not enough quantifiable evaluation of outcomes or impact from these schools. I really hope to see more objective measures to assess the value of a college education—forget the meaningless bragging rights that parents often focus on. Not everyone cares about LV bags |
stanford, mit, princeton have the highest starting salaries and employment rates and it is not a coincidence. |
depends: Stanford MIT are on par or better than the four ivies(HPPY) in the T10, .Northwestern and JHU are not. Chicago is not. Caltech is too different to compare to any of these schools. |
It absolutely is. Northwestern and Duke with one ED round are the only T10 on par with ivies, though neither are quite on par with the top half of the ivy league as far as reputation with top jobs and top grad/prof, though it is debatable. Some of that is due to ivies being many of the top law and med and slightly favor other ivies over other T10-15. |
+1 and Penn and Columbia and Duke have surpassed Yale in the same areas. By a lot |
is that why hopkins and chicago have higher freshman stats and better employment outcomes? |
+++ |
In tech and AI arena, have to mention Cornell, which is superior to HYP, Penn, Columbia, and Duke. |
Can you post the other publications college rankings for comparison. |
| Definitely different reputation for Tech |
| Chicago ranks #1 Econ. |