Is there any difference in terms of brand quality between T10 ivy and T10 non-ivy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

I have always thought it's suspicious that UChicago and JHU have ED2. Makes me think less of the school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

Who besides UChicago? JHU?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

That is a great differentiator.

this is a lazy differentiator. chicago and hopkins do not admit 10% of class from waitlist or offer guaranteed transfers for sophomore year like cornell and harvard

[Anonymous]

https://www.ivycoach.com/the-ivy-coach-blog/ivy-league/the-scoop-harvard-z-list/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

I have always thought it's suspicious that UChicago and JHU have ED2. Makes me think less of the school.

then you're pathetic. one was brave enough to get rid of legacy admissions and do test required while other ivies lag

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some posters here have an extremely tech-centric view of the world. They think that if you are not an engineer you nothing. Guess what - for all of the well-publicized engineers who made a fortune founding a company, there are countless engineers toiling away coding.

I am more impressed with the schools that feed top banks, PE, big law, MBB, etc. Schools that serve not just as academic training grounds but also social finishing schools so you know how to navigate a cocktail party, a board of a major charitable organization, etc. Knowing what to say and what not to say in various situations. To be able to do this is to have truly made it in America.

These are the skills taught at Yale secret societies, top Princeton eating clubs, Harvard final clubs, and in the basements of Dartmouth frats playing beer pong.

The "if you are not in a very pre-professional major, you are a nobody" crowd doesn't get this.

one of the dumbest things ive read on here and i worked at bcg. truly congrats

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:better name brand for T1-5 than 5-10. and 2 of the top 5 are non-Ivy. But Yale and Stanford are both better than Penn.

penn has a lot of cringey icky gunners but they do know how to write a resume.

many kids at yale are really bad at this. it's as if they expect the name to open doors or they just aren't into presenting themselves to the professional working environment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

ivies like dartmouth admit a ton via waitlist. not impressive

Dartmouth admitted ZERO from the WL last cycle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

I have always thought it's suspicious that UChicago and JHU have ED2. Makes me think less of the school.

location is the reason why. If they were in the tri state or new england, they would not have ed2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

I have always thought it's suspicious that UChicago and JHU have ED2. Makes me think less of the school.

location is the reason why. If they were in the tri state or new england, they would not have ed2.

chicago is much more desirable than middle of nowhere new hampshire or ithaca or rhode island

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

ivies like dartmouth admit a ton via waitlist. not impressive

Dartmouth admitted ZERO from the WL last cycle.

Agree. and Princeton a minuscule amount. Same with Penn. They figured it out.
Brown was the outlier last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

ivies like dartmouth admit a ton via waitlist. not impressive

Dartmouth admitted ZERO from the WL last cycle.

congrats but it has not been that way historically

https://www.ivycoach.com/the-ivy-coach-blog/ivy-league/dartmouth-college-waitlist-acceptance-rate/

not bad for a
lesser ivy i suppose

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

I have always thought it's suspicious that UChicago and JHU have ED2. Makes me think less of the school.

location is the reason why. If they were in the tri state or new england, they would not have ed2.

chicago is much more desirable than middle of nowhere new hampshire or ithaca or rhode island

no, it isn't.

bucolic new england is the traditional americana college experience that is deep in our cultural memory stretching back centuries.

providence is a better college city than chicago. chicago is a superior city, but not as a college city.

imaging prefering 0-block, king von, chief keef, chiraqology to college hill in providence or hanover.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

I have always thought it's suspicious that UChicago and JHU have ED2. Makes me think less of the school.

location is the reason why. If they were in the tri state or new england, they would not have ed2.

chicago is much more desirable than middle of nowhere new hampshire or ithaca or rhode island

no, it isn't.

bucolic new england is the traditional americana college experience that is deep in our cultural memory stretching back centuries.

providence is a better college city than chicago. chicago is a superior city, but not as a college city.

imaging prefering 0-block, king von, chief keef, chiraqology to college hill in providence or hanover.

ah yes bucolic hanover and ithaca with drinking problems is exactly the college experience of americana. put down the wine, it’s vinegar now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you agree-
T10 ivy differs from T10 non-ivy in their brand style, but not in their brand quality?

I can tell you none of ivies have ED2.

Many T10 non-ivy have ED2, Chicago has ED0 and WL admits on top of that.

Hopefully you can see the difference in brand quality immediately.

ivies like dartmouth admit a ton via waitlist. not impressive

Dartmouth admitted ZERO from the WL last cycle.

congrats but it has not been that way historically

https://www.ivycoach.com/the-ivy-coach-blog/ivy-league/dartmouth-college-waitlist-acceptance-rate/

not bad for a
lesser ivy i suppose

I have nothing to do with Dartmouth, was just pointing out the fact. The historical numbers are in line with Harvard’s, and in many years they were zero too. You sound like some ass bi*tch loser. I feel sorry for you,