
Yeah. The information was pretty widely available within days of the test. |
DP. There were multiple test prep companies harvesting questions to “crack the test”, as the school board said. |
TJ class of 2024 had less than 1% kids from low-income families. In an area with over 1/3rd low-income families. |
White students were getting worse scores that Asians despite being wealthier. It's not a matter of interest. If wealth drives the test scores then based on the number of white students applying to TJ there should have been a lot more white students at TJ. Sure money makes a difference but not enough to get white students in on a proportional basis. Anecdotally, the white students at TJ are disproportionately the children of at least one immigrant parent. Same with the black students. |
White families aren’t as interested in TJ. They know it’s a grind that will hurt their kids’ chances for college admissions. Wealth drove TJ admissions. Less than 1% of class of 2024 came from economically-disadvantaged families. |
The class of 2022 (the first year of quant q) had 1.5% FARM. why didn't the elimination of test prep make any difference in the quantity of FARM admits? Because it's not money that is keeping them out. It's 8 years of unenriched education. If your kids had been picking his nose for 8 years and mine has been doing Singapore math for 8 years, then all things being equal, my kid eats you kids lunch academically. This was not about income. This was never about income. It was about racial representation. That much is clear from the hearings and correspondence. This was about race. |
+1000 |
Keep saying that and you and your "+1000" (lol/*sigh*) friends might convince yourself it's true. |
truth hurts more than the +1000. Like they say, don’t matter what school you at — if you ain’t puttin’ in that sweat time, you ain’t droppin’ no buckets. Switchin’ up tryouts to essay scribbles, ain’t gon’ turn you into no better baller. The court speaks the truth, after all. |
Then why was there a lower admission rate among a much more self selective pool of white applicants than there was among the pool of Asian applicants that seemed to be applying indiscriminately? The change in the admissions process was never about income, it was always about race. That was obvious during the hearings and board meetings. |
I support the changes becuase I think it's crazy that a kid should need to do "Singapore math for 8 years" to have a shot at getting into TJ...and agree that the race imbalances drove the changes. But the best reason for keeping them isn't racial balancing. It's to slow down the ridiculous arms race of "Singapore math for 8 years" in kid's ES and MS outside cramming. Now, coudl it do a better job of finding the kids from each school that are great at STEM and will flourish - even if they haven't devoted 8 yeras to beyond-school math and/or parent-driven Olympiad stuff? Yes. But if it's a black / white choice of the old system vs the new system....new system is better since kids who are highly talented at STEM but haven't had parents coaching them on outside STEM ECs / tutoring for years deserve a shot too. |
The thing is the new selection process has no way of knowing if they are “highly talented” at STEM. A better system would be to keep the test AND give welfare… |
It was about a lot of things. There is a long history behind the ongoing changes to the admissions process. It's disingenuous to ignore that. Outside enrichment was yet another way that wealthy parents shelled out money to give their kids a leg up in TJ admissions. |
The current admissions process could use some tweaking. Maybe add SOL scores as a data point. But it's still much better than the prior process. |
Did they ever release the new rankings? |