Bethesda Soccer On Way Down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a major misalignment of expectations of what people want out of youth soccer clubs and what they actually are.

I see posts holding them to professional standards of the not-for-profit, educational and general business worlds. No-one can blame people for wanting the best for their children but this is miles away from what these clubs actually are.

With probably very few exceptions nationally, youth soccer clubs are run by people with very little or no professional education or business organizational experience. The primary source of revenue is player fees as most are not part of a pro or semi-pro club and youth soccer is not subsidized or affiliated in this country the way it is in others. So you have a very poorly run business that cannot afford quality administration and organization, which affects everyone negatively, hence the disorganization and lack of accountability and transparency. This model relies heavily on volunteerism and nepotism (heavily run by spouses of coaches/directors and parents) - like the soccer, these jobs are executed on an amateur level because of the low pay and standards.

On the coaching side, except for the top teams, these are typically men (and occasionally women) who have played amateur soccer at some point in their lives and have often coached their own kids when they were little enough to claim a few seasons of experience and call themselves a youth coach. Getting a D or grassroots coaching license is the very bottom of the barrel and it doesn't require any qualifications related to working with children and young people the way any other job would. Very few clubs do a legitimate screening and in many other fields some of these people will never qualify to work with children. Some behavior of coaching staff and parent on sidelines is the prime examples of an abusive culture that is tolerated in youth sports but has no place in any other child-centered environment. Most coaches have daytime jobs and do this on the side for various personal reasons (some more valid than others).

Now everything and everyone is not all bad. After all, some of our kids are learning and developing and enjoying the game. But if we have to be fair to them, we'd have to consider the environment that we're willingly putting them in. And simply paying fees with unsubstantiated expectations does not relieve us of our duty to demand the best for our children. It is our responsibility to ensure that our kids are in good hands and that they're having positive experiences. If you're not asking the questions and considering your coach's qualifications, the clubs organization and business practices when joining the club then you're simply punting the responsibility of protecting and nurturing your child to a group of strangers. Complaining on a blog about it doesn't do much either. If we don't start demanding higher standards, we'll never get them.

+1000000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t get about this storyis why would JC go through the trouble of altering some contract for a SUMMER game for freaking U9??? Was the contract used to get rid of one kid? Did more than one kid get punished for this alleged violation? Or are you saying he said you can’t do this it’s in the contract so the kids did not play and so they are suing? Why in the world would BSC care about this age group playing a summer tournament. I have never heard about them or any club caring about that ever, much less at such a young age. I don’t get what JC gets out of this??

That’s the million dollar question. And yes he flat out said can’t play. A group tried to register a team for the summer. Like BSC owns them; just seems like a worldview of how dare “our” talent play soccer under any name/jersey other than Bethesda. He refused to bend and produced the altered contract as supposedly what they agreed to a year ago. It’s comically illegal and unenforceable, but like an earlier poster said, these people running soccer clubs aren’t exactly savvy lawyers or businessmen.

All this for 7 year olds playing summer soccer. Some 501(c)(3) …. suppress rather than promote little kiddies playing soccer. BSC offers nothing free or included over the summer. It just ends unless you’re old enough to give them $700-$800 for super y starting u10.

Not exactly true. BSC offers one week of summer camp free to current players. You can pick any week. I have no argument with anything else you said.

I was PP and correct. Forgot to include the camp week for YDP.

[Anonymous]

These is what happens to a club that has the ECNL/MLS Next monopoly in MoCo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These is what happens to a club that has the ECNL/MLS Next monopoly in MoCo.

They don't have a monopoly on the boys side, just the girls.

[Anonymous]

I’ve been around the local game a long time, have seen other coaches and other clubs use all sort of tactics to “prove” to families why they should choose their club. Just feel like whoever keeps bumping this thread either has an axe to grind or an agenda from another club. Have seen all the Bmore clubs air out each others dirty laundry in the past. It just seems ridiculous that this is what this board has turned into, DMV TMZ Soccer

[Anonymous]

Just noticed that in MLS Next 23/24 season, SYC finished ahead of Bethesda in every age group except U19

Meaning U13, U14, U15, U16, U17, U18 SYC on top in the local rivalry

(for those who were waiting to see how the bio-banding mass application would work out)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just noticed that in MLS Next 23/24 season, SYC finished ahead of Bethesda in every age group except U19

Meaning U13, U14, U15, U16, U17, U18 SYC on top in the local rivalry

(for those who were waiting to see how the bio-banding mass application would work out)

Way to go SYC
That's a good look

[Anonymous]

WHOever is working overtime to push this thread down shall fail

[Anonymous]

So SYC Dominated Bethesda this MLS Next season in the standings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So SYC Dominated Bethesda this MLS Next season in the standings?

Seems that way

[Anonymous]

We are developing players, not about winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We are developing players, not about winning.

Who is "We"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just noticed that in MLS Next 23/24 season, SYC finished ahead of Bethesda in every age group except U19

Meaning U13, U14, U15, U16, U17, U18 SYC on top in the local rivalry

(for those who were waiting to see how the bio-banding mass application would work out)

Cool. Do college commitments next.

[Anonymous]

All of these silly SYC deflection posts won’t stop the truth from coming out.

[Anonymous]

Is there really an SYC v Bethesda rivalry? Or is just in the head of a few posters here? I mean don’t they serve two completely different areas so what exactly would they be competing for?

My DS is MLSNext in the area and it’s a small world among kids on the top teams so I have some knowledge as to why kids and families pick certain clubs over others. For the most part, most families seem to have put their kid on the best team that is the best fit for their kid and the family. Kids and parents prefer specific coaches or certain kinds of training and kids have different goals as to their soccer “careers” and these two clubs are sufficiently differently that they are rarely competing for the same type of kids and families.