Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s permanent return to UK is very ‘possible’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Serious question — PP upgrade said the British people prefer a pedophile to a mixed race women.
I watch a lot of British TV and I am constantly amazed at how diverse t is. Judging by the TV shows, gorgeous mixed race women are a dime a dozen in England and no one blinks an eye. I’m sure this is overstated but it seems to me that it must indicate some level of acceptance, at least of mixed race folks with a good British accent who seem home grown.

I’m sure Princess michael is wildly racist and Camilla probably at a minimum probably full of nicroagrezsions. But do we think the general British public is racist in this way?

I think they do have a strong anti-American bias. Again, judging by TV—our movies and shows are overwhelmed with Brits but it seems like Gillian Anderson is the only American that they’ve been willing to accept.

Americans are just as racist but we do love a good British accent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Serious question — PP upgrade said the British people prefer a pedophile to a mixed race women.
I watch a lot of British TV and I am constantly amazed at how diverse t is. Judging by the TV shows, gorgeous mixed race women are a dime a dozen in England and no one blinks an eye. I’m sure this is overstated but it seems to me that it must indicate some level of acceptance, at least of mixed race folks with a good British accent who seem home grown.

I’m sure Princess michael is wildly racist and Camilla probably at a minimum probably full of nicroagrezsions. But do we think the general British public is racist in this way?

I think they do have a strong anti-American bias. Again, judging by TV—our movies and shows are overwhelmed with Brits but it seems like Gillian Anderson is the only American that they’ve been willing to accept.

If the only thing you know about a whole country is from watching TV why on earth would you advertise that. And further why do you think that qualifies you to make sweeping judgements about them?

[Anonymous]

It’s only a matter of time before these grifters go back.

[Anonymous]

In or out, they'll always have millions and invites to charity galas and award ceremonies but their desired lifestyle needs mega millions, which requires a brilliant strategy for which they need a brilliant consultant or a mega billionaire with a plan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s only a matter of time before these grifters go back.

Maybe they’ll buy a townhouse in Belgravia, hire a household staff and start a new reality show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never gonna happen.

They’ve made it clear that they don’t want their kids being raised in that atmosphere.

Well the game has changed big time.

How so?

The majority of the living working Royals are 70+ with limited time left. Charles presumed to die or abdicate in next few years if not sooner, and Camilla will no longer be queen. Kate not expected to take on all Queen duties based on her condition. They need more working "hands".

William has cousins, the grandchildren of Elizabeth II and the nieces and nephews of King Charles. And those cousins have children. Anyone who has opted out as Harry and Meghan have done can be replaced in these roles. And I say that as a fan of Harry and Meghan.

William should pick any of these people over Harry and Meghan.

More importantly, why would any of these people want to serve at the beck and call of a brooding, temperamental, petty man instead of what they are currently doing--living well and having the freedom to have some control over their lives?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would they want to go back to a country that prefer a pedophile to a mixed race woman?

Money and status.

I don't think Harry and Meghan have been as financially successful as they expected. They got a few early deals, but then those went away and.... crickets....

Yea I don't understand their strategy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would they want to go back to a country that prefer a pedophile to a mixed race woman?

Money and status.

I don't think Harry and Meghan have been as financially successful as they expected. They got a few early deals, but then those went away and.... crickets....

Yea I don't understand their strategy

It was a knee jerk, Covid era reaction.

[Anonymous]

They’re running out of money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They’re running out of money.

They'll bring out the kids first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would have to grovel to William (and Kate) first, which they are constitutionally incapable of doing. So it won't happen.

William is going to need him. Charles and Camilla out of the picture and Kate may not be able to return fully for some time.

They need William.

Err, I don't think so. They can live a pretty posh Hollywood life with almost no rules. Why would they go back to a place where they can't even make their own phone calls to a doctor without permission? Hell no.

Hollywood doesn’t want them.

They didn't want the Kardashians either, and yet they are billionaires multiple times over.

The Kardashians are rich because they were willing to drop their clothes.

This is such a weak argument-millions upon millions of people are willing and have dropped their clothes and done much more and have 1/1000 of what the Kardashians have.

The Kardashians (aka Kris) are brilliant and ruthless and willing to be vulnerable and exposed on a level most could not fathom!

Thats something to admire if your values align with them, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never gonna happen.

They’ve made it clear that they don’t want their kids being raised in that atmosphere.

Well the game has changed big time.

How so?

The majority of the living working Royals are 70+ with limited time left. Charles presumed to die or abdicate in next few years if not sooner, and Camilla will no longer be queen. Kate not expected to take on all Queen duties based on her condition. They need more working "hands".

There are plenty of other royals who would thrilled to be allowed to become working royals. Harry is superfluous.

Really? Who would want to bow at the feet of William and have to grovel for work when you already have a career?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never gonna happen.

They’ve made it clear that they don’t want their kids being raised in that atmosphere.

Well the game has changed big time.

How so?

The majority of the living working Royals are 70+ with limited time left. Charles presumed to die or abdicate in next few years if not sooner, and Camilla will no longer be queen. Kate not expected to take on all Queen duties based on her condition. They need more working "hands".

There are plenty of other royals who would thrilled to be allowed to become working royals. Harry is superfluous.

Really? Who would want to bow at the feet of William and have to grovel for work when you already have a career?

Apparently Harry and Meghan want to bow and grovel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Serious question — PP upgrade said the British people prefer a pedophile to a mixed race women.
I watch a lot of British TV and I am constantly amazed at how diverse t is. Judging by the TV shows, gorgeous mixed race women are a dime a dozen in England and no one blinks an eye. I’m sure this is overstated but it seems to me that it must indicate some level of acceptance, at least of mixed race folks with a good British accent who seem home grown.

I’m sure Princess michael is wildly racist and Camilla probably at a minimum probably full of nicroagrezsions. But do we think the general British public is racist in this way?

I think they do have a strong anti-American bias. Again, judging by TV—our movies and shows are overwhelmed with Brits but it seems like Gillian Anderson is the only American that they’ve been willing to accept.

Gillian Anderson is pretty dreamy. Why did we ever let her go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never gonna happen.

They’ve made it clear that they don’t want their kids being raised in that atmosphere.

Well the game has changed big time.

How so?

The majority of the living working Royals are 70+ with limited time left. Charles presumed to die or abdicate in next few years if not sooner, and Camilla will no longer be queen. Kate not expected to take on all Queen duties based on her condition. They need more working "hands".

There are plenty of other royals who would thrilled to be allowed to become working royals. Harry is superfluous.

Really? Who would want to bow at the feet of William and have to grovel for work when you already have a career?

What career?