Calista still looks soooo young

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This woman hasn't had surgery - those of you claiming she had sound ridiculous. She has the same face she's always had, just aged a bit. In fact, her nose is the type that most actresses probably would have surgically altered, but she has not.

Disagree. Her b/w photo shows nostrils more in line with her bridge. The photos in color all show a narrowing of the tip and her nostrils shaped differently, more flared out to the sides.

That is just silly. The two photos are taken at different angles, for one. Of course the second one shows her nostrils more prominently - she’s tilting her head to the side! Her nose is exactly the same. It certainly isn’t any smaller as she’s aged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This woman hasn't had surgery - those of you claiming she had sound ridiculous. She has the same face she's always had, just aged a bit. In fact, her nose is the type that most actresses probably would have surgically altered, but she has not.

Disagree. Her b/w photo shows nostrils more in line with her bridge. The photos in color all show a narrowing of the tip and her nostrils shaped differently, more flared out to the sides.

That is just silly. The two photos are taken at different angles, for one. Of course the second one shows her nostrils more prominently - she’s tilting her head to the side! Her nose is exactly the same. It certainly isn’t any smaller as she’s aged.

The colored photos at the top of the page. There you can see her nose from the front. Compare those to the b/w photo. If you still can't see any difference, then you'll never see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She and Christy Turlington have both done a good job of getting work done that helps them maintain their natural beauty, without doing anything so drastic that it hits uncanny valley territory. They actually seem to have done similar things with their cheeks and lips and it's good, subtle work that lets them have that plump, rosy cheek look and keeps their lips from totally disappearing (Flockhart has always had thin lips and they are thin now but not so thin as to be very aging).

Christy looks awful and she’s of child bearing age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Christy Turlington have both done a good job of getting work done that helps them maintain their natural beauty, without doing anything so drastic that it hits uncanny valley territory. They actually seem to have done similar things with their cheeks and lips and it's good, subtle work that lets them have that plump, rosy cheek look and keeps their lips from totally disappearing (Flockhart has always had thin lips and they are thin now but not so thin as to be very aging).

Christy looks awful and she’s of child bearing age.

She’s 55.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This woman hasn't had surgery - those of you claiming she had sound ridiculous. She has the same face she's always had, just aged a bit. In fact, her nose is the type that most actresses probably would have surgically altered, but she has not.

Disagree. Her b/w photo shows nostrils more in line with her bridge. The photos in color all show a narrowing of the tip and her nostrils shaped differently, more flared out to the sides.

That is just silly. The two photos are taken at different angles, for one. Of course the second one shows her nostrils more prominently - she’s tilting her head to the side! Her nose is exactly the same. It certainly isn’t any smaller as she’s aged.

The colored photos at the top of the page. There you can see her nose from the front. Compare those to the b/w photo. If you still can't see any difference, then you'll never see it.

We'll just have to agree to disagree. There is zero evidence that she's had plastic surgery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This woman hasn't had surgery - those of you claiming she had sound ridiculous. She has the same face she's always had, just aged a bit. In fact, her nose is the type that most actresses probably would have surgically altered, but she has not.

Disagree. Her b/w photo shows nostrils more in line with her bridge. The photos in color all show a narrowing of the tip and her nostrils shaped differently, more flared out to the sides.

That is just silly. The two photos are taken at different angles, for one. Of course the second one shows her nostrils more prominently - she’s tilting her head to the side! Her nose is exactly the same. It certainly isn’t any smaller as she’s aged.

The colored photos at the top of the page. There you can see her nose from the front. Compare those to the b/w photo. If you still can't see any difference, then you'll never see it.

We'll just have to agree to disagree. There is zero evidence that she's had plastic surgery.

You’re obviously not close to 60. Look, it’s very possible to be all natural and beautiful at 60, but nonetheless, there will be signs of aging that appear - softening of the jawline, sagging eyelids, compared to 50 or 40. There is zero chance she has not had subtle help. Look at Annette Bening to see a beautiful 60-something woman who has taken very good care of herself but has not had plastic surgery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Christy Turlington have both done a good job of getting work done that helps them maintain their natural beauty, without doing anything so drastic that it hits uncanny valley territory. They actually seem to have done similar things with their cheeks and lips and it's good, subtle work that lets them have that plump, rosy cheek look and keeps their lips from totally disappearing (Flockhart has always had thin lips and they are thin now but not so thin as to be very aging).

Christy looks awful and she’s of child bearing age.

She’s 55.

Yes, and she's gorgeous. PP is insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This woman hasn't had surgery - those of you claiming she had sound ridiculous. She has the same face she's always had, just aged a bit. In fact, her nose is the type that most actresses probably would have surgically altered, but she has not.

Disagree. Her b/w photo shows nostrils more in line with her bridge. The photos in color all show a narrowing of the tip and her nostrils shaped differently, more flared out to the sides.

That is just silly. The two photos are taken at different angles, for one. Of course the second one shows her nostrils more prominently - she’s tilting her head to the side! Her nose is exactly the same. It certainly isn’t any smaller as she’s aged.

The colored photos at the top of the page. There you can see her nose from the front. Compare those to the b/w photo. If you still can't see any difference, then you'll never see it.

We'll just have to agree to disagree. There is zero evidence that she's had plastic surgery.

You’re obviously not close to 60. Look, it’s very possible to be all natural and beautiful at 60, but nonetheless, there will be signs of aging that appear - softening of the jawline, sagging eyelids, compared to 50 or 40. There is zero chance she has not had subtle help. Look at Annette Bening to see a beautiful 60-something woman who has taken very good care of herself but has not had plastic surgery.

PP here - I’m 58. And while I’m not as pretty as Calista, I have aged in much the same way. Minimal sagging, wrinkling, etc. I look at her and see someone who is clearly my age and who is aging gracefully without surgery. That said, I can see subtle signs of aging - her neck and eyelids look about like mine and that of my similarly aged friends.

Again, neither of us has any proof either way, so we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This woman hasn't had surgery - those of you claiming she had sound ridiculous. She has the same face she's always had, just aged a bit. In fact, her nose is the type that most actresses probably would have surgically altered, but she has not.

Disagree. Her b/w photo shows nostrils more in line with her bridge. The photos in color all show a narrowing of the tip and her nostrils shaped differently, more flared out to the sides.

That is just silly. The two photos are taken at different angles, for one. Of course the second one shows her nostrils more prominently - she’s tilting her head to the side! Her nose is exactly the same. It certainly isn’t any smaller as she’s aged.

The colored photos at the top of the page. There you can see her nose from the front. Compare those to the b/w photo. If you still can't see any difference, then you'll never see it.

We'll just have to agree to disagree. There is zero evidence that she's had plastic surgery.

You’re obviously not close to 60. Look, it’s very possible to be all natural and beautiful at 60, but nonetheless, there will be signs of aging that appear - softening of the jawline, sagging eyelids, compared to 50 or 40. There is zero chance she has not had subtle help. Look at Annette Bening to see a beautiful 60-something woman who has taken very good care of herself but has not had plastic surgery.

PP here - I’m 58. And while I’m not as pretty as Calista, I have aged in much the same way. Minimal sagging, wrinkling, etc. I look at her and see someone who is clearly my age and who is aging gracefully without surgery. That said, I can see subtle signs of aging - her neck and eyelids look about like mine and that of my similarly aged friends.

Again, neither of us has any proof either way, so we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

Meh. Gravity applies to us all. She’s had at least a deep plane neck lift and lower bleph. Otherwise she’d have at least minimal bags and her neck and jaw line would sag more. She looks good for her age!

[Anonymous]

In Calista’s younger photo she has lines on each side of her cheek near her mouth. In her older photo the lines have magically disappeared. Interesting.

[Anonymous]

She looks thin, but not painfully thin, now.

[Anonymous]

I think she looks great. And given her thinness, I'm a little surprised - sometimes being very thin can be aging.

[Anonymous]

She's always had that waifish look.

[Anonymous]

She's just a naturally thin person. Like many of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously look at the younger picture on page 3 and tell me where those crazy puffed up cheeks were then. I think she looks fine for her age, but no question she has had some work done. And honestly it's kind of a creepy Joker look, albeit with a few more lines on her face than much of her age cohort in Hollywood.

I hate to be mean, but I thought it was a bit joker-ish as well. Definitely not unique to her, though; a lot of celebs seem to wind up this way.