Joe Biden is the best president of my lifetime

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who witnessed the horrendous withdrawal from Afghanistan and the continued disaster at our southern border cannot, in good faith, make this claim. Up until Biden, Jimmy Carter was the worst president of my lifetime. Biden has taken that title now.
Food prices are higher than they have been - ever - and mortgage loans have nearly tripled since he has been in office. His out of control spending caused that. And, we have cities with crime rates that are creeping higher each day.
Along with being the worst president performance-wise, he is also the most divisive president we have ever had.


If you are going to criticized the "horrendous" withdrawal, then you have to acknowledge how we got there...Trump and Pompeo negotiated with the Taliban, cutting out the Afghan government, they closed US state department offices that could have facilitated visas for an orderly exit for Afghani's; they started pulling out troops beforehand, without planning and they released 5000 Taliban fighters who were directly involved in making the exit "horrendous" - the bottom line, the US is out, and it isn't an anchor on our country anymore.

And the southern border is actually very orderly right now. Notice how you never see fresh pictures of hordes of people there now?

Immigration is still a major issue. There needs to be a lot of money invested in administration to adjudicate the asylum cases. Why won't the GOP step up and help pass a bill to do that? Why didn't that happen in the early 2010's when Obama and a bi-partisan Senate had a bill ready to go? Because Speaker Ryan refused to bring the bill to the House floor because he wanted to make people like you angry at the brown people and they want the chaos so you can post messages JUST like this one. They don't want to govern or solve problems, they want to keep people like you angry at immigration and immigrants, and have grievances about the deep state and the lazy brown people on handouts and emails and laptops. How much longer are you going to fall for the BS?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who witnessed the horrendous withdrawal from Afghanistan and the continued disaster at our southern border cannot, in good faith, make this claim. Up until Biden, Jimmy Carter was the worst president of my lifetime. Biden has taken that title now.
Food prices are higher than they have been - ever - and mortgage loans have nearly tripled since he has been in office. His out of control spending caused that. And, we have cities with crime rates that are creeping higher each day.
Along with being the worst president performance-wise, he is also the most divisive president we have ever had.


If you are going to criticized the "horrendous" withdrawal, then you have to acknowledge how we got there...Trump and Pompeo negotiated with the Taliban, cutting out the Afghan government, they closed US state department offices that could have facilitated visas for an orderly exit for Afghani's; they started pulling out troops beforehand, without planning and they released 5000 Taliban fighters who were directly involved in making the exit "horrendous" - the bottom line, the US is out, and it isn't an anchor on our country anymore.

And the southern border is actually very orderly right now. Notice how you never see fresh pictures of hordes of people there now?

Immigration is still a major issue. There needs to be a lot of money invested in administration to adjudicate the asylum cases. Why won't the GOP step up and help pass a bill to do that? Why didn't that happen in the early 2010's when Obama and a bi-partisan Senate had a bill ready to go? Because Speaker Ryan refused to bring the bill to the House floor because he wanted to make people like you angry at the brown people and they want the chaos so you can post messages JUST like this one. They don't want to govern or solve problems, they want to keep people like you angry at immigration and immigrants, and have grievances about the deep state and the lazy brown people on handouts and emails and laptops. How much longer are you going to fall for the BS?


The first role of a president is to keep the American people safe.
Biden has not done that at all. Beginning with his disastrous decisions when it came to Afghanistan and continuing with the ongoing border crisis.

And, no, the border is not orderly. At all. Biden has had nearly 7 million encounters in less than 3 years. That is abysmal.
And, that whole Afghanistan withdrawal "deal" was conditions-based. The conditions were not met and should have never happened like it did.

Keep making excuses for the incompetent boob occupying the White House. Anyone paying attention knows the truth.

Anonymous
Unvaccinated migrant children pouring into the school systems. Have fun, leftists
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion: Joe Biden is the best president of my lifetime.

I’m center-left. Born in 1988. Of all the presidents in my lifetime, Biden, whom I voted for but not in the primary, has come closest to making my own (middle class) life meaningfully better. He has taken reasonable and pragmatic action on student loans. He is staying strong on Ukraine without doing anything stupid. He’s rescheduled marijuana. His NLRB has been fantastic. He’s good on infrastructure and not terrible on the environment. He’s softened the blow of a looming recession. He’s old, but a sane and rational adult. He’s not perfect, but he has earned the vote of this former Bernie-or-Buster.


Completely agree.

I think that history will be particularly kind to Biden. He's overseeing a great economy, managed the transition from COVID to post-COVID very well, passed a great infrastructure bill, the IRA will likely prove to be a fantastic investment, and his reintroduction of industrial policy is leading to reshoring well-paying jobs. He's repaired our image abroad, strengthened old alliances, and has helped Ukraine stave off Russia and exposed them as a paper tiger with minimal investment and zero US casualties.

Fifty years from now, people will look at is low approval ratings and wonder what the hell most people were thinking. Republicans are pitching a hissy-fit for no reason other than the (D) next to his name, and people are wringing his hands because he's old, but whatever. Dude's killing it.

+1 to you both. I think most people don’t really think for themselves on politics. Hardcore Republicans reflexively hate Democrats and the rest of most people mentally frame things however mainstream media frames them. The mainstream media in this country is very Republicans from the point of Afghanistan withdrawal - yet another thing Biden did well and is not going to get credit for for years - i.e. when a massive source of revenue for the corporate owners of media dried up, they began to go hard against Biden.

Would I have picked him? No, I voted in the primary for someone else. But he’s been amazing. Way to go, Black voters. You’re the ones who picked Biden and he’s been great.


Ask the black people in Chicago and other cities who are pissed about migrants flooding in, getting better benefits than them


I listened to a NY Times The Daily podcast about Ramaswamy who likes to make this same claim as you and he went to Chicago to meet with a Black community thinking he could play up the migrant angle. But no one in the audience wanted to talk about it. They had other issues like gun violence on their minds. Not migrants. So yes you can ask them. But you won’t hear what you want to hear. It’s a made up GOP talking point.
There are videos online. Look them up
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion: Joe Biden is the best president of my lifetime.

I’m center-left. Born in 1988. Of all the presidents in my lifetime, Biden, whom I voted for but not in the primary, has come closest to making my own (middle class) life meaningfully better. He has taken reasonable and pragmatic action on student loans. He is staying strong on Ukraine without doing anything stupid. He’s rescheduled marijuana. His NLRB has been fantastic. He’s good on infrastructure and not terrible on the environment. He’s softened the blow of a looming recession. He’s old, but a sane and rational adult. He’s not perfect, but he has earned the vote of this former Bernie-or-Buster.


Completely agree.

I think that history will be particularly kind to Biden. He's overseeing a great economy, managed the transition from COVID to post-COVID very well, passed a great infrastructure bill, the IRA will likely prove to be a fantastic investment, and his reintroduction of industrial policy is leading to reshoring well-paying jobs. He's repaired our image abroad, strengthened old alliances, and has helped Ukraine stave off Russia and exposed them as a paper tiger with minimal investment and zero US casualties.

Fifty years from now, people will look at is low approval ratings and wonder what the hell most people were thinking. Republicans are pitching a hissy-fit for no reason other than the (D) next to his name, and people are wringing his hands because he's old, but whatever. Dude's killing it.

+1 to you both. I think most people don’t really think for themselves on politics. Hardcore Republicans reflexively hate Democrats and the rest of most people mentally frame things however mainstream media frames them. The mainstream media in this country is very Republicans from the point of Afghanistan withdrawal - yet another thing Biden did well and is not going to get credit for for years - i.e. when a massive source of revenue for the corporate owners of media dried up, they began to go hard against Biden.

Would I have picked him? No, I voted in the primary for someone else. But he’s been amazing. Way to go, Black voters. You’re the ones who picked Biden and he’s been great.


Ask the black people in Chicago and other cities who are pissed about migrants flooding in, getting better benefits than them


^ We Black people can always tell when people who don’t know any Black people talk about what Black people want.

Please stop.


Get in touch with your people:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/tempers-flare-at-community-meeting-on-migrant-shelter-opening-in-east-hyde-park-hotel/ar-AA1g13s6
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My lifetime is marked by GOP Presidents who increased wealth disparity by pushing for tax cuts the country couldn’t afford and slashing domestic spending, and weak Democratic Presidents who were unable to reign in the mess their Republican counterparts caused.


The government is not supposed to be a transfer mechanism for wealth.

I understand the attitude changed to a sense of entitlement, but you really aren't owed.

JFK said it: "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country". He, as a democrat, would not recognize the USA today.

The democrat party has become totally alien to that, and just expects handouts from others and keeps asking for more: free childcare, free healthcare, free universal basic income, free this, free that. Why should anyone bother working?

70% of the federal budget is transfer payments. It's time for that nonsense to end. You're getting more than ever from other people and yet, it's never enough for you.


Funny how you fail to acknowledge the wealth accumulation that happened during slavery that benefited many of the families that are the leisure class rich today, or the corporate hand outs, or the subsidies to farmers and other industries that are not the working poor. If you want to save money, start by taxing estates over 25 or 30 million, taxing income over a million, trust me, it won't curtail people's motivation to work hard and earn and save. Also, what do you expect those who you claim "expect handouts" to do when they are already working two jobs at minimum wage and can't keep their heads above water? What about those who are disability and can't work, many of whom are white, poor people who have diabetes and sit on their butts in Appalchia etc? We are supposed to be a wealthy country who take care of their poor and raise all boats, but if you want to consider people who are pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, then you also have to consider a lot of people were born on 3rd base as well.


I'm tired of you griping about the poor. You live in perpetual victimhood. That's on you.

"In his January 1964 State of the Union address, President Lyndon Johnson proclaimed, “This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.” In the 50 years since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs. Adjusted for inflation, this spending (which does not include Social Security or Medicare) is three times the cost of all U.S. military wars since the American Revolution. Yet progress against poverty, as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau, has been minimal, and in terms of President Johnson’s main goal of reducing the “causes” rather than the mere “consequences” of poverty, the War on Poverty has failed completely. In fact, a significant portion of the population is now less capable of self-sufficiency than it was when the War on Poverty began. " - Heritage.org


It isn't about personal victimhood, would you rather people are simply starving in the streets, that people just die because? And again, you fail to recognize people like Peter Theil, Marck Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are not self made billionaires. They all started life on 3rd base. They should have generations of progency set for life because of luck of the draw?

There are millions of Americans who grow up, save money, live a good life, worked hard and have a few hundred thousand or million to pass on, that is great and should be encouraged. But at what point is the amount of money a next generation needs to have a good start in life? 10 million? 50 milli0on? 5 billion? Some of that money should be taxed, because it is the conditions in the US that facilitated these people to make their billions, and the country should be paid back for some of that infrastructure, education or market conditions that enabled it.


How many new migrants are you taking into your home? Have you adopted a family? Or are you for this mass immigration and content to just let our tax dollars pay for them?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My lifetime is marked by GOP Presidents who increased wealth disparity by pushing for tax cuts the country couldn’t afford and slashing domestic spending, and weak Democratic Presidents who were unable to reign in the mess their Republican counterparts caused.


The government is not supposed to be a transfer mechanism for wealth.

I understand the attitude changed to a sense of entitlement, but you really aren't owed.

JFK said it: "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country". He, as a democrat, would not recognize the USA today.

The democrat party has become totally alien to that, and just expects handouts from others and keeps asking for more: free childcare, free healthcare, free universal basic income, free this, free that. Why should anyone bother working?

70% of the federal budget is transfer payments. It's time for that nonsense to end. You're getting more than ever from other people and yet, it's never enough for you.


Funny how you fail to acknowledge the wealth accumulation that happened during slavery that benefited many of the families that are the leisure class rich today, or the corporate hand outs, or the subsidies to farmers and other industries that are not the working poor. If you want to save money, start by taxing estates over 25 or 30 million, taxing income over a million, trust me, it won't curtail people's motivation to work hard and earn and save. Also, what do you expect those who you claim "expect handouts" to do when they are already working two jobs at minimum wage and can't keep their heads above water? What about those who are disability and can't work, many of whom are white, poor people who have diabetes and sit on their butts in Appalchia etc? We are supposed to be a wealthy country who take care of their poor and raise all boats, but if you want to consider people who are pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, then you also have to consider a lot of people were born on 3rd base as well.


I'm tired of you griping about the poor. You live in perpetual victimhood. That's on you.

"In his January 1964 State of the Union address, President Lyndon Johnson proclaimed, “This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.” In the 50 years since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs. Adjusted for inflation, this spending (which does not include Social Security or Medicare) is three times the cost of all U.S. military wars since the American Revolution. Yet progress against poverty, as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau, has been minimal, and in terms of President Johnson’s main goal of reducing the “causes” rather than the mere “consequences” of poverty, the War on Poverty has failed completely. In fact, a significant portion of the population is now less capable of self-sufficiency than it was when the War on Poverty began. " - Heritage.org


It isn't about personal victimhood, would you rather people are simply starving in the streets, that people just die because? And again, you fail to recognize people like Peter Theil, Marck Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are not self made billionaires. They all started life on 3rd base. They should have generations of progency set for life because of luck of the draw?

There are millions of Americans who grow up, save money, live a good life, worked hard and have a few hundred thousand or million to pass on, that is great and should be encouraged. But at what point is the amount of money a next generation needs to have a good start in life? 10 million? 50 milli0on? 5 billion? Some of that money should be taxed, because it is the conditions in the US that facilitated these people to make their billions, and the country should be paid back for some of that infrastructure, education or market conditions that enabled it.


How many new migrants are you taking into your home? Have you adopted a family? Or are you for this mass immigration and content to just let our tax dollars pay for them?


Unless you change the laws and international law, your bleating doesn't change the factors that push people to come to the US.

Corrupt governments
Climate change
American business owners rewarding illegal immigration by giving under the table jobs at slave wages

The list goes on.

A wall doesn't solve it, and besides, the wall has mostly fallen down and was easily scaleable with a simply ladder anyhow.

Unless the GOP is willing to implement eVerify, which they haven't done, to take the incentive for illegals "pouring" into the US, nothing will change. Maybe start with the Trump properties which are notorious hotbeds of illegal workers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My lifetime is marked by GOP Presidents who increased wealth disparity by pushing for tax cuts the country couldn’t afford and slashing domestic spending, and weak Democratic Presidents who were unable to reign in the mess their Republican counterparts caused.


The government is not supposed to be a transfer mechanism for wealth.

I understand the attitude changed to a sense of entitlement, but you really aren't owed.

JFK said it: "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country". He, as a democrat, would not recognize the USA today.

The democrat party has become totally alien to that, and just expects handouts from others and keeps asking for more: free childcare, free healthcare, free universal basic income, free this, free that. Why should anyone bother working?

70% of the federal budget is transfer payments. It's time for that nonsense to end. You're getting more than ever from other people and yet, it's never enough for you.


Funny how you fail to acknowledge the wealth accumulation that happened during slavery that benefited many of the families that are the leisure class rich today, or the corporate hand outs, or the subsidies to farmers and other industries that are not the working poor. If you want to save money, start by taxing estates over 25 or 30 million, taxing income over a million, trust me, it won't curtail people's motivation to work hard and earn and save. Also, what do you expect those who you claim "expect handouts" to do when they are already working two jobs at minimum wage and can't keep their heads above water? What about those who are disability and can't work, many of whom are white, poor people who have diabetes and sit on their butts in Appalchia etc? We are supposed to be a wealthy country who take care of their poor and raise all boats, but if you want to consider people who are pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, then you also have to consider a lot of people were born on 3rd base as well.


I'm tired of you griping about the poor. You live in perpetual victimhood. That's on you.

"In his January 1964 State of the Union address, President Lyndon Johnson proclaimed, “This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.” In the 50 years since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs. Adjusted for inflation, this spending (which does not include Social Security or Medicare) is three times the cost of all U.S. military wars since the American Revolution. Yet progress against poverty, as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau, has been minimal, and in terms of President Johnson’s main goal of reducing the “causes” rather than the mere “consequences” of poverty, the War on Poverty has failed completely. In fact, a significant portion of the population is now less capable of self-sufficiency than it was when the War on Poverty began. " - Heritage.org


It isn't about personal victimhood, would you rather people are simply starving in the streets, that people just die because? And again, you fail to recognize people like Peter Theil, Marck Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are not self made billionaires. They all started life on 3rd base. They should have generations of progency set for life because of luck of the draw?

There are millions of Americans who grow up, save money, live a good life, worked hard and have a few hundred thousand or million to pass on, that is great and should be encouraged. But at what point is the amount of money a next generation needs to have a good start in life? 10 million? 50 milli0on? 5 billion? Some of that money should be taxed, because it is the conditions in the US that facilitated these people to make their billions, and the country should be paid back for some of that infrastructure, education or market conditions that enabled it.


How many new migrants are you taking into your home? Have you adopted a family? Or are you for this mass immigration and content to just let our tax dollars pay for them?


Unless you change the laws and international law, your bleating doesn't change the factors that push people to come to the US.

Corrupt governments
Climate change
American business owners rewarding illegal immigration by giving under the table jobs at slave wages

The list goes on.

A wall doesn't solve it, and besides, the wall has mostly fallen down and was easily scaleable with a simply ladder anyhow.

Unless the GOP is willing to implement eVerify, which they haven't done, to take the incentive for illegals "pouring" into the US, nothing will change. Maybe start with the Trump properties which are notorious hotbeds of illegal workers.


BS. None of those are our problem.

Corrupt governments? We should stop inserting ourselves around the world. Start with OUR corrupt government and our dear leader pulling in money from Russia, China, Romania and Ukraine to line his and his family's pockets.
You have yet to prove climate change even exists. People like you would waste money boiling the ocean as long as you didn't need to pay for it.
E-verify - you've corrupted that with EEOC laws that hide any enforcement of it and put businesses in jeopardy if they question a person's legal status to work.

"Requiring applicants or newly hired employees to provide certain specific or additional employment authorization documents because of their citizenship status or national origin rather than accepting any of the several forms of documentation individuals are permitted to submit under applicable federal law."

https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/fact-sheet-immigrants-employment-rights-under-federal-anti-discrimination-laws
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who witnessed the horrendous withdrawal from Afghanistan and the continued disaster at our southern border cannot, in good faith, make this claim. Up until Biden, Jimmy Carter was the worst president of my lifetime. Biden has taken that title now.
Food prices are higher than they have been - ever - and mortgage loans have nearly tripled since he has been in office. His out of control spending caused that. And, we have cities with crime rates that are creeping higher each day.
Along with being the worst president performance-wise, he is also the most divisive president we have ever had.


If you are going to criticized the "horrendous" withdrawal, then you have to acknowledge how we got there...Trump and Pompeo negotiated with the Taliban, cutting out the Afghan government, they closed US state department offices that could have facilitated visas for an orderly exit for Afghani's; they started pulling out troops beforehand, without planning and they released 5000 Taliban fighters who were directly involved in making the exit "horrendous" - the bottom line, the US is out, and it isn't an anchor on our country anymore.

And the southern border is actually very orderly right now. Notice how you never see fresh pictures of hordes of people there now?

Immigration is still a major issue. There needs to be a lot of money invested in administration to adjudicate the asylum cases. Why won't the GOP step up and help pass a bill to do that? Why didn't that happen in the early 2010's when Obama and a bi-partisan Senate had a bill ready to go? Because Speaker Ryan refused to bring the bill to the House floor because he wanted to make people like you angry at the brown people and they want the chaos so you can post messages JUST like this one. They don't want to govern or solve problems, they want to keep people like you angry at immigration and immigrants, and have grievances about the deep state and the lazy brown people on handouts and emails and laptops. How much longer are you going to fall for the BS?

Mic drop.

Notice the first maga to reply to didn’t read more than one or two words and then they were off to the races with their irrelevant partisan blather.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My lifetime is marked by GOP Presidents who increased wealth disparity by pushing for tax cuts the country couldn’t afford and slashing domestic spending, and weak Democratic Presidents who were unable to reign in the mess their Republican counterparts caused.


The government is not supposed to be a transfer mechanism for wealth.

I understand the attitude changed to a sense of entitlement, but you really aren't owed.

JFK said it: "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country". He, as a democrat, would not recognize the USA today.

The democrat party has become totally alien to that, and just expects handouts from others and keeps asking for more: free childcare, free healthcare, free universal basic income, free this, free that. Why should anyone bother working?

70% of the federal budget is transfer payments. It's time for that nonsense to end. You're getting more than ever from other people and yet, it's never enough for you.


Funny how you fail to acknowledge the wealth accumulation that happened during slavery that benefited many of the families that are the leisure class rich today, or the corporate hand outs, or the subsidies to farmers and other industries that are not the working poor. If you want to save money, start by taxing estates over 25 or 30 million, taxing income over a million, trust me, it won't curtail people's motivation to work hard and earn and save. Also, what do you expect those who you claim "expect handouts" to do when they are already working two jobs at minimum wage and can't keep their heads above water? What about those who are disability and can't work, many of whom are white, poor people who have diabetes and sit on their butts in Appalchia etc? We are supposed to be a wealthy country who take care of their poor and raise all boats, but if you want to consider people who are pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, then you also have to consider a lot of people were born on 3rd base as well.


I'm tired of you griping about the poor. You live in perpetual victimhood. That's on you.

"In his January 1964 State of the Union address, President Lyndon Johnson proclaimed, “This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.” In the 50 years since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs. Adjusted for inflation, this spending (which does not include Social Security or Medicare) is three times the cost of all U.S. military wars since the American Revolution. Yet progress against poverty, as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau, has been minimal, and in terms of President Johnson’s main goal of reducing the “causes” rather than the mere “consequences” of poverty, the War on Poverty has failed completely. In fact, a significant portion of the population is now less capable of self-sufficiency than it was when the War on Poverty began. " - Heritage.org


It isn't about personal victimhood, would you rather people are simply starving in the streets, that people just die because? And again, you fail to recognize people like Peter Theil, Marck Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are not self made billionaires. They all started life on 3rd base. They should have generations of progency set for life because of luck of the draw?

There are millions of Americans who grow up, save money, live a good life, worked hard and have a few hundred thousand or million to pass on, that is great and should be encouraged. But at what point is the amount of money a next generation needs to have a good start in life? 10 million? 50 milli0on? 5 billion? Some of that money should be taxed, because it is the conditions in the US that facilitated these people to make their billions, and the country should be paid back for some of that infrastructure, education or market conditions that enabled it.


How many new migrants are you taking into your home? Have you adopted a family? Or are you for this mass immigration and content to just let our tax dollars pay for them?


Unless you change the laws and international law, your bleating doesn't change the factors that push people to come to the US.

Corrupt governments
Climate change
American business owners rewarding illegal immigration by giving under the table jobs at slave wages

The list goes on.

A wall doesn't solve it, and besides, the wall has mostly fallen down and was easily scaleable with a simply ladder anyhow.

Unless the GOP is willing to implement eVerify, which they haven't done, to take the incentive for illegals "pouring" into the US, nothing will change. Maybe start with the Trump properties which are notorious hotbeds of illegal workers.


BS. None of those are our problem.

Corrupt governments? We should stop inserting ourselves around the world. […]

Go back in time and tell your sainted Ronnie that. You know why so many of those immigrants are at our door? He has quite a lot to do with it.

And Biden is a great president. He’s not corrupt; in fact Democrats tend not to be. And when they are, they’re dealt with. Republicans defend their party’s depravity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Reagan was so loved by hispanic immigrants that babies were named after him.

Biden though? puhleeeze

I’ve never met a Hispanic named Ronald or Reagan for that matter.


Fascinating. My kids have had Hispanic classmates named Reagan. I didn’t know there was a connection with the former president. I figured there was some other meaning behind the name. (Didn’t study Spanish, French or any more common foreign language.)

And Cristiano Ronaldo (born 1985) was actually named after Reagan. Who knew...


Dems love to argue and they lack logic in everything. I really don't see how they stay married to one another. It's like talking to Elle woods. Ronaldo is Brazilian. Latinos abroad aren't the same as Latino immigrants who aren't the same as Latino Americans who have been here for decades. There's a difference.

That would be a surprise to him. He's Portugese.


I meant this Ronaldo whose actually LATINO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronaldo_(Brazilian_footballer)
The PP mentioned Cristiano Ronaldo. He's Portugese, champ.

Why the heck are you mentioning a NON LATINO?
Anonymous
While I do support Ukraine and Ukrainian independence & freedom, I wonder whether all of the death & destruction is justifiable.

So long as Putin controls Russia, Russia will never cease in its effort to control Ukraine.

Prior to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Ukraine--alongside Russia--was among the top group of the most corrupt countries in the world, but it was a beautiful and safe country. Now it is a ravaged wasteland of destroyed building, destroyed infrastructure,and destroyed lives.

Surely, there must have been a better way to deal with Russia's aggression under Putin.

Biden is a fool. Got the US out of Afghanistan only to turn around and get the US involved in another unwinnable war.
Anonymous
I think he was just what we needed after that idiot Trump.

A calm, steady hand at the wheel. His knowledge is really paying off as well. Trump got nothing done but a tax cut for the rich but Biden's two big bills benefit us all.

Anonymous
Yes, a calm steady hand

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Reagan was so loved by hispanic immigrants that babies were named after him.

Biden though? puhleeeze

I’ve never met a Hispanic named Ronald or Reagan for that matter.


Depends how you define him, but Cristiano Ronaldo was named after him.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: