2022-2023 PARCC Data Released

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.


And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!


jklm includes: maury, brent, l-t, sww and now payne (welcome payne!)


Poor langley


Well, Langley does have an improvement relative to last year, which is something. Some schools don't show improvement at all.
Anonymous
Eliot Hine is on the move. Correct me if I pulled numbers incorrectly, I was using an old PARCC presentation slide of their year by year performance from a prior year.

ELA:
2017-2018: 13%
2018-2019: 23%
2021-2022: 28%
2021-23: 34%

Math:
2017-2018: 4%
2018-2019: 13%
2021-2022: 10%
2021-23: 19%

Of note, the scores stratified by race show very wide differences. Among Black, still improvement.
ELA
2018: 9%
2023: 22%

Math
2018: 2%
2023: 7%
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.


And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!


jklm includes: maury, brent, l-t, sww and now payne (welcome payne!)


Poor langley


Well, Langley does have an improvement relative to last year, which is something. Some schools don't show improvement at all.


What are the numbers?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.


And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!


jklm includes: maury, brent, l-t, sww and now payne (welcome payne!)


Poor langley


Well, Langley does have an improvement relative to last year, which is something. Some schools don't show improvement at all.


What are the numbers?


Well, I'm not really sure my analysis is accurate, but I think it's like this: Last year at Langley, almost 7% got a 4 or 5 in math, and 10% a 4 or 5 in ELA. This year, almost 10% got a 4 or 5 in math and 17% got a 4 or 5 in ELA. So I think those are statistically significant increases... not sure. It's hard with schools with such small testing populations, the numbers can jump around.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Eliot Hine is on the move. Correct me if I pulled numbers incorrectly, I was using an old PARCC presentation slide of their year by year performance from a prior year.

ELA:
2017-2018: 13%
2018-2019: 23%
2021-2022: 28%
2021-23: 34%

Math:
2017-2018: 4%
2018-2019: 13%
2021-2022: 10%
2021-23: 19%

Of note, the scores stratified by race show very wide differences. Among Black, still improvement.
ELA
2018: 9%
2023: 22%

Math
2018: 2%
2023: 7%


Those scores are terrible.
Anonymous
I just ran a quick conditional formatting and here's what jumps out at me, for elementary and middle schools relative to last year.

Well done Brent
Atrocious math results at Brookland Middle, but slight improvement over last year.
Big improvement at Burroughs
Small improvement at CHML
CMI did better
DCB did better
DC Scholars did better
Great job Deal
Well done DCI
Dorothy Height took a dip
Eagle Academy Congress Heights worse than last year-- really low
Eliot-Hine went up
Stokes Brookland improved but Stokes EE went down
Some improvement in Friendship schools, mixed results
Well done Garrison, big improvements!
HD Cooke improved
Harmony improved
Hearst fell a bit in ELA, improved in math
Howard still really struggling with math
Hyde-Addison showed a big improvement
Ingenuity Prep improved
ITS seems to have dipped a little, hard to say without digging into it more.
Not so hot at JO Wilson
Slight improvement at Jefferson
KIPP schools seem overall slight improvement
Well done Lafayette!
Langley improved a bit
Slight improvement at LAMB
Lee Brookland improved
MacFarland improved
Mann dropped a bit, quite a bit in ELA.
Increase at Marie Reed
Big increase at Maury
Slight improvement at McKinley Middle
I think slight improvement at Meridian
Miner about the same, pretty low
Mundo Calle Ocho did ok, P St had mixed results
Murch improved in math
Improvement at Nalle
Improvement at Noyes
Oyster improved
Patterson improved
Paul slight improvement (middle)
Big improvement at Payne
Improvement at Perry St Prep
Big math improvement at Powell
Randle Highlands improved
Raymond mixed but big improvement in math
Rocketship did a lot better at Infinity, other sites not so much.
Big improvements at Roots
Well done Ross!!
SWW@FS improved math
SWS slight improvement
Improvement at Seaton
Big improvements at Sela
SSMA did slightly worse
Mixed results at Simon
Smothers improved ELA
Social Justice improved
Mixed results at Sousa
Big improvement at Stanton
Well done Stoddert!
Stuart-Hobson improved on both
Takoma improved on both
Truth improved on both
Thomas improved ELA
Thomson did not do as well
Truesdell did not do as well
Tubman did not do as well
Big improvements at Turner
TR 4th elementary down a little, TRY elementary up a little, TRY middle up a little
Tyler improved
Van Ness down a little in ELA
Walker-Jones has a big improvement in math
Washington Global improved
Latin 2nd improved (middle)
YY improved
Watkins slight improvement in math
Wheatley improved ELA
Big improvements at Whittier
Anonymous
Here are the proficiency results for high school. It looks like Walls (a selective school that only accepts students with an A average GPA) has slightly pulled ahead of BASIS DC (a 100% lottery school).

Walls

ELA 94.66
Math 67.44

BASIS DC

ELA 92.06
Math 66.12

Banneker

ELA 88.62
Math 44.52

Latin

ELA 70.71
Math 30.47

DCI

ELA 41.87
Math 20.74
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Here are the proficiency results for high school. It looks like Walls (a selective school that only accepts students with an A average GPA) has slightly pulled ahead of BASIS DC (a 100% lottery school).

Walls

ELA 94.66
Math 67.44

BASIS DC

ELA 92.06
Math 66.12

Banneker

ELA 88.62
Math 44.52

Latin

ELA 70.71
Math 30.47

DCI

ELA 41.87
Math 20.74


This is high school? Why is DCI so bad?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here are the proficiency results for high school. It looks like Walls (a selective school that only accepts students with an A average GPA) has slightly pulled ahead of BASIS DC (a 100% lottery school).

Walls

ELA 94.66
Math 67.44

BASIS DC

ELA 92.06
Math 66.12

Banneker

ELA 88.62
Math 44.52

Latin

ELA 70.71
Math 30.47

DCI

ELA 41.87
Math 20.74


This is high school? Why is DCI so bad?


There's a lot more than meets the eye with high school math PARCC scores. Analyze with caution.
Anonymous
How did Powell, Bruce Monroe, and Marie Reed do?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eliot Hine is on the move. Correct me if I pulled numbers incorrectly, I was using an old PARCC presentation slide of their year by year performance from a prior year.

ELA:
2017-2018: 13%
2018-2019: 23%
2021-2022: 28%
2021-23: 34%

Math:
2017-2018: 4%
2018-2019: 13%
2021-2022: 10%
2021-23: 19%

Of note, the scores stratified by race show very wide differences. Among Black, still improvement.
ELA
2018: 9%
2023: 22%

Math
2018: 2%
2023: 7%


Those scores are terrible.


Yes. But they are moving upward.

To evaluate real school performance, scores need to be stratified by SES. Unfortunately, DC doesn't provide that in a helpful way. It's otherwise difficult to understand teaching effectiveness when the primary differences between school scores are explained by SES. Essentially, if you cut the data by ethnicity, you'll see that school scores don't differ as much as you think they do.

Race/Ethnicity White - ELA:
Hardy: 86%
Deal: 92%
Eliot Hine: >95%

Race/Ethnicity White - Math:
Hardy - DS, too small to report
Deal: 84%
Eliot-Hine: 86%

#s too small to do a similar report for different middle schools for other ethnicities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here are the proficiency results for high school. It looks like Walls (a selective school that only accepts students with an A average GPA) has slightly pulled ahead of BASIS DC (a 100% lottery school).

Walls

ELA 94.66
Math 67.44

BASIS DC

ELA 92.06
Math 66.12

Banneker

ELA 88.62
Math 44.52

Latin

ELA 70.71
Math 30.47

DCI

ELA 41.87
Math 20.74


This is high school? Why is DCI so bad?


There's a lot more than meets the eye with high school math PARCC scores. Analyze with caution.


Kid at DCI?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Here are the proficiency results for high school. It looks like Walls (a selective school that only accepts students with an A average GPA) has slightly pulled ahead of BASIS DC (a 100% lottery school).

Walls

ELA 94.66
Math 67.44

BASIS DC

ELA 92.06
Math 66.12

Banneker

ELA 88.62
Math 44.52

Latin

ELA 70.71
Math 30.47

DCI

ELA 41.87
Math 20.74


Look, I have no child anywhere near highschool (yet), but we should consider what probably is/isn't an actual meaningful/statistical difference. SWW vs. Basis look the same.

When comparing schools, figuring out differences in SES makeup also matters. It's really tough to do an apples to apples comparison without taking that into account.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What an embarrassment. 9/10 HS students can't even meet the baseline math expectations?



This is not true. My 10th grader didn’t take PARCC because he is was in AP stats. and got a 5 on his AP test. There are plenty of kids who are advanced in math and don’t take PARCC. Your numbers are wrong.


Thinking that perhaps you could learn a thing or two from your 10th grader who took AP stats.


Wow so rude. Look at the PARCC spreadsheets on the OSSE website and you'll see that lots of kids don't take any math PARCC test at all. They only test certain classes. I wish we had more comprehensive data and I'm sad that we don't, but it's simply not true that 9/10 kids are failing math. It's more like 6/10.


Algebra I and Geometry are tested. So this tells us 9/10 students currently enrolled in Algebra and Geometry can’t do those types of math. PPs kid was counted as a kid who can do math when they were in those courses in previous years.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here are the proficiency results for high school. It looks like Walls (a selective school that only accepts students with an A average GPA) has slightly pulled ahead of BASIS DC (a 100% lottery school).

Walls

ELA 94.66
Math 67.44

BASIS DC

ELA 92.06
Math 66.12

Banneker

ELA 88.62
Math 44.52

Latin

ELA 70.71
Math 30.47

DCI

ELA 41.87
Math 20.74


This is high school? Why is DCI so bad?


There's a lot more than meets the eye with high school math PARCC scores. Analyze with caution.


Kid at DCI?


Not at all, I don't even have a child of that age. But if you read backwards through this thread and others, you'll see a discussion of how the math PARCC works and what it reports and does not report. I'm not saying any one school is better in math than another-- I'd have to really look through the data, and it depends on the modeling assumptions you make. The sad truth is PARCC doesn't tell us very much about math after 9th grade.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: