2022-2023 PARCC Data Released

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And you can no longer see how many 5s, which is disappointing if you're looking to place an above-level kid.

You don't need to "place" your kid... you know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And you can no longer see how many 5s, which is disappointing if you're looking to place an above-level kid.

You don't need to "place" your kid... you know.

Oh please. We all make choices even if we choose our IB.

[Anonymous]

I can work on it tonight, but I think if you do either a filter, or a leveled sort of

Column I
AND Column J
AND Column L
AND then percentage

You should be able to capture all the "alls" and then pull data fairly close to the top of the 20000000000 results

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know better I'd think OSSE put these together to obfuscate results and make it harder to figure out what's going on.

This, this, thus. Scores have gone down overall and we know it.

Hiding breakdown 5’s because no one is above grade level.

It’s similar to grouping 3,4,5 and saying approaching grade level because you have so little at grade level.

Full transparency is showing percentages at each level which is not happening in DC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can work on it tonight, but I think if you do either a filter, or a leveled sort of

Column I
AND Column J
AND Column L
AND then percentage

You should be able to capture all the "alls" and then pull data fairly close to the top of the 20000000000 results

Edit, put Column P/percentage first

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know better I'd think OSSE put these together to obfuscate results and make it harder to figure out what's going on.

This, this, thus. Scores have gone down overall and we know it.

Hiding breakdown 5’s because no one is above grade level.

It’s similar to grouping 3,4,5 and saying approaching grade level because you have so little at grade level.

Full transparency is showing percentages at each level which is not happening in DC

PP above. They also present hodgepodge of data instead of cheating breaking it down to each school in the past with DC school report. Notice how that hasn’t been updated since COVID and now we have this BS to plow through

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know better I'd think OSSE put these together to obfuscate results and make it harder to figure out what's going on.

This, this, thus. Scores have gone down overall and we know it.

Hiding breakdown 5’s because no one is above grade level.

It’s similar to grouping 3,4,5 and saying approaching grade level because you have so little at grade level.

Full transparency is showing percentages at each level which is not happening in DC

PP above. They also present hodgepodge of data instead of cheating breaking it down to each school in the past with DC school report. Notice how that hasn’t been updated since COVID and now we have this BS to plow through

Typo clearly

[Anonymous]

when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.

And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.

And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!

jklm includes: maury, brent, l-t, sww and now payne (welcome payne!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.

And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!

jklm includes: maury, brent, l-t, sww and now payne (welcome payne!)

Poor langley

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.

And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!

jklm includes: maury, brent, l-t, sww and now payne (welcome payne!)

Poor langley

more schools can be added based on PARCC performance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:when is someone going to process the jklm and hrcs data and post the rankings here?? cmon dcum.

And then add in SSMA for the giggles.
And don't forget Capitol Hill!

jklm includes: maury, brent, l-t, sww and now payne (welcome payne!)

Poor langley

more schools can be added based on PARCC performance

Shepherd's numbers look really good.

[Anonymous]

Why are there over 1000 rows per school, many of which look repetitive and are in a nonsensical order?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are there over 1000 rows per school, many of which look repetitive and are in a nonsensical order?

Those are all the subcategories and the order depends on how you sort the spreadsheet.