Surprise! Actually, not really....Millennials continue to shift to the right

[Anonymous]

[code]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, leave it up to a rapist to climb that mountain of winning over the millennials. Is this a satire thread? I suppose hope springs eternal in the dying GOP.

Are you the same troll who includes "rapist" in every post? JFC, get over yourself. I'm not a Trump fan, but you're just acting like a petulant kid. Grow up.

Np- being desensitized to sexual assault and criminality isn’t a sign of maturity.

+1
It is very weird that almost every Republican has decided that Trump’s rapes - so decided by a jury of his peers in a court of law - are not disqualifying for their vote. Weird, disturbing, revealing, shocking… none of it is a good look. He’s an actual rapist.

That alone is going to prevent a lot of Millennials from switching to the GOP’s brand of toxicity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's important to differentiate between national politics and local politics. Democrats have a significant advantage with every generation below the boomers - abortion, health care etc. But at the local level, democrats are a disaster - crime, restorative justice, absurd school boards. So I think that's where the tension lies. People generally like democratic policies at the national level. But they've come to despise the local progressives that are ruining cities throughout the country.

Doesn't mean people are turning to Republicans. That's a clown show.

You're not completely wrong (although you missed that Dems are screwing up at the national level too), but people have to choose D or R. Crime, restorative justice, and absurd school boards affect my family's daily lives a lot more than access to abortion. To date, the most harmful political event that my family has EVER experienced was the prolonged DCPS school closures. So I recently switched from a DC dem to move to another area where I'm now a republican. I'm pro-choice, but I'll just pay to travel if my daughter ever needs access to an abortion that we can't get where we live.

I don’t believe a word of the above, but if I did , I’d remind you that all woman who can give birth are hurt by “pro life” legislation. That will occur to you as your daughter bleeds out and is denied healthcare. But you showed the school board! Take that libz!

You know it's the truth or you wouldn't become so defensive and angry. It's not about "showing the school board." It's that Washington Teachers Union and their political supporters created an entire generation of public school children with trauma. Deal and Wilson/J-R used to be good, safe schools. After the ridiculous school closures for A YEAR AND A HALF, they had daily fights and learning was disrupted by constant behavior problems. They idiotic school leadership focused way too much on SJW stuff in lieu of a solid education. Our WOTP elementary has unprecedented levels of bullying and other behavior problems. So many kids with elevated anxiety, unusual even for this group. And that's the kids who go to school. Many of them dropped out and became career criminals due to school closures. It's about the WORST city council we've had in a very long time encouraging crime. The crazy progressives screaming people are racist for wanting open schools and lower crime. You can continue to enjoy crappy public schools and high crime. I'm out.

Experts expected an increase in aggression and violence after the pandemic. I recall hearing a former DHS employee that had left and moved to Texas. As soon as the pandemic hit, they rehired her to deal with the expected increase in domestic terrorism. You can continue to blame the school board if you’d like, but it isn’t that simple.

This link does a good job of explaining why it happens:

https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2021/06/why-is-violent-behavior-spiking-as-pandemic-ebbs/?fj=1

BS. It was the school closures. Enough with the progressive gaslighting.

Did you read the link? How would school closures cause more violence and aggression in people not in school, and without kids in school?

[Anonymous]

Apparently being a rapist still qualifies a republican candidate to become POTUS.

Never change, hypocrites and immoral deplorables.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's important to differentiate between national politics and local politics. Democrats have a significant advantage with every generation below the boomers - abortion, health care etc. But at the local level, democrats are a disaster - crime, restorative justice, absurd school boards. So I think that's where the tension lies. People generally like democratic policies at the national level. But they've come to despise the local progressives that are ruining cities throughout the country.

Doesn't mean people are turning to Republicans. That's a clown show.

You're not completely wrong (although you missed that Dems are screwing up at the national level too), but people have to choose D or R. Crime, restorative justice, and absurd school boards affect my family's daily lives a lot more than access to abortion. To date, the most harmful political event that my family has EVER experienced was the prolonged DCPS school closures. So I recently switched from a DC dem to move to another area where I'm now a republican. I'm pro-choice, but I'll just pay to travel if my daughter ever needs access to an abortion that we can't get where we live.

I don’t believe a word of the above, but if I did , I’d remind you that all woman who can give birth are hurt by “pro life” legislation. That will occur to you as your daughter bleeds out and is denied healthcare. But you showed the school board! Take that libz!

You know it's the truth or you wouldn't become so defensive and angry. It's not about "showing the school board." It's that Washington Teachers Union and their political supporters created an entire generation of public school children with trauma. Deal and Wilson/J-R used to be good, safe schools. After the ridiculous school closures for A YEAR AND A HALF, they had daily fights and learning was disrupted by constant behavior problems. They idiotic school leadership focused way too much on SJW stuff in lieu of a solid education. Our WOTP elementary has unprecedented levels of bullying and other behavior problems. So many kids with elevated anxiety, unusual even for this group. And that's the kids who go to school. Many of them dropped out and became career criminals due to school closures. It's about the WORST city council we've had in a very long time encouraging crime. The crazy progressives screaming people are racist for wanting open schools and lower crime. You can continue to enjoy crappy public schools and high crime. I'm out.

Experts expected an increase in aggression and violence after the pandemic. I recall hearing a former DHS employee that had left and moved to Texas. As soon as the pandemic hit, they rehired her to deal with the expected increase in domestic terrorism. You can continue to blame the school board if you’d like, but it isn’t that simple.

This link does a good job of explaining why it happens:

https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2021/06/why-is-violent-behavior-spiking-as-pandemic-ebbs/?fj=1

BS. It was the school closures. Enough with the progressive gaslighting.

Did you read the link? How would school closures cause more violence and aggression in people not in school, and without kids in school?

Not interested in your article. Many of us already know that the school closures are the reason for the increased levels of trauma in school-aged children.

Plus the libs instituted a bunch of other overly restrictive rules. Also the school closures set off a domino effect of other problems because parents couldn't go into work. It also created an extremely stressful, no-win situation for parents now required to provide the childcare and education that schools are supposed to provide AND trying to do their own jobs. It was the liberal reaction to the pandemic, not the pandemic itself that created these social maladies. There's nothing the liberal media can say to make many people believe this wasn't the case, but you can keep trying with the gaslighting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently being a rapist still qualifies a republican candidate to become POTUS.

Never change, hypocrites and immoral deplorables.

The cons have no moral low that they cannot swallow.

[Anonymous]

Most republicans seem perfectly fine with a rapist as their leader and at the helm of our country. No surprise I suppose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most republicans seem perfectly fine with a rapist as their leader and at the helm of our country. No surprise I suppose.

The present GQP used to be a fairly respectable party. Those days are long gone, aren't they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most republicans seem perfectly fine with a rapist as their leader and at the helm of our country. No surprise I suppose.

The present GQP used to be a fairly respectable party. Those days are long gone, aren't they?

It was always a very thin veneer of respectability that's been completely stripped away by their rapist leader.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently being a rapist still qualifies a republican candidate to become POTUS.

Never change, hypocrites and immoral deplorables.

This article may help explain why.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/05/16/no-trump-is-not-required-to-register-as-a-sex-offender-fact-check/70217795007/

[Anonymous]

While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most republicans seem perfectly fine with a rapist as their leader and at the helm of our country. No surprise I suppose.

The present GQP used to be a fairly respectable party. Those days are long gone, aren't they?

It's a completely different party now...except that its members don't know it yet. I'm old enough to have seen several iterations of the GOP, and this one is nothing like the one that existed up until Bush 2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's important to differentiate between national politics and local politics. Democrats have a significant advantage with every generation below the boomers - abortion, health care etc. But at the local level, democrats are a disaster - crime, restorative justice, absurd school boards. So I think that's where the tension lies. People generally like democratic policies at the national level. But they've come to despise the local progressives that are ruining cities throughout the country.

Doesn't mean people are turning to Republicans. That's a clown show.

You're not completely wrong (although you missed that Dems are screwing up at the national level too), but people have to choose D or R. Crime, restorative justice, and absurd school boards affect my family's daily lives a lot more than access to abortion. To date, the most harmful political event that my family has EVER experienced was the prolonged DCPS school closures. So I recently switched from a DC dem to move to another area where I'm now a republican. I'm pro-choice, but I'll just pay to travel if my daughter ever needs access to an abortion that we can't get where we live.

I don’t believe a word of the above, but if I did , I’d remind you that all woman who can give birth are hurt by “pro life” legislation. That will occur to you as your daughter bleeds out and is denied healthcare. But you showed the school board! Take that libz!

You know it's the truth or you wouldn't become so defensive and angry. It's not about "showing the school board." It's that Washington Teachers Union and their political supporters created an entire generation of public school children with trauma. Deal and Wilson/J-R used to be good, safe schools. After the ridiculous school closures for A YEAR AND A HALF, they had daily fights and learning was disrupted by constant behavior problems. They idiotic school leadership focused way too much on SJW stuff in lieu of a solid education. Our WOTP elementary has unprecedented levels of bullying and other behavior problems. So many kids with elevated anxiety, unusual even for this group. And that's the kids who go to school. Many of them dropped out and became career criminals due to school closures. It's about the WORST city council we've had in a very long time encouraging crime. The crazy progressives screaming people are racist for wanting open schools and lower crime. You can continue to enjoy crappy public schools and high crime. I'm out.

Experts expected an increase in aggression and violence after the pandemic. I recall hearing a former DHS employee that had left and moved to Texas. As soon as the pandemic hit, they rehired her to deal with the expected increase in domestic terrorism. You can continue to blame the school board if you’d like, but it isn’t that simple.

This link does a good job of explaining why it happens:

https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2021/06/why-is-violent-behavior-spiking-as-pandemic-ebbs/?fj=1

BS. It was the school closures. Enough with the progressive gaslighting.

Did you read the link? How would school closures cause more violence and aggression in people not in school, and without kids in school?

Not interested in your article. Many of us already know that the school closures are the reason for the increased levels of trauma in school-aged children.

Plus the libs instituted a bunch of other overly restrictive rules. Also the school closures set off a domino effect of other problems because parents couldn't go into work. It also created an extremely stressful, no-win situation for parents now required to provide the childcare and education that schools are supposed to provide AND trying to do their own jobs. It was the liberal reaction to the pandemic, not the pandemic itself that created these social maladies. There's nothing the liberal media can say to make many people believe this wasn't the case, but you can keep trying with the gaslighting.

It’s not really an article, but go ahead and stick your head in the sand. You don’t hear anything that doesn’t validate your super special snowflake feelings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

If you read the article, it explained the difference between being convicted or liable in a criminal vs civil case. He was only found liable in a civil case, unfortunately that's not the same as being found guilty in a criminal case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

If you read the article, it explained the difference between being convicted or liable in a criminal vs civil case. He was only found liable in a civil case, unfortunately that's not the same as being found guilty in a criminal case.

DP. Come on now. OJ Simpson was found not guilty in a criminal case but found guilty for the same crime in a civil case. We all know he was guilty, even though the he did not ultimately face criminal charges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

If you read the article, it explained the difference between being convicted or liable in a criminal vs civil case. He was only found liable in a civil case, unfortunately that's not the same as being found guilty in a criminal case.

DP. Come on now. OJ Simpson was found not guilty in a criminal case but found guilty for the same crime in a civil case. We all know he was guilty, even though the he did not ultimately face criminal charges.

DP. No WE did not all know he was guilty and if I was on that jury I would still find him not guilty based on the evidence presented at trial. And no Trump was not found guilty in the civil trial. There is no guilt or innocence in civil trial it’s negligence or liable or not negligent or liable. Also the burdens of proof are different in the two differ t courts. Therefore it’s possible that although Trump was found to be liable by a preponderance of the evidence, the same jury could have found him not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.