Surprise! Actually, not really....Millennials continue to shift to the right

[Anonymous]

Well, we know know that trump is a rapist and we cannot be sued for defamation for saying it because it's true in the eyes of the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

A jury of his peers. Laughable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, we know know that trump is a rapist and we cannot be sued for defamation for saying it because it's true in the eyes of the law.

We all know if you are on any jury that involved any republican, you would not even care about the evidence. Nor would a bunch of others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

A jury of his peers. Laughable.

Yes, republicans have found the courts laughable. That's why hundreds have been incarcerated thus far this year and counting. Keep laughing rapist supporters. That's definitely a winning 2024 position.

[Anonymous]

"We love Rapists"

The new de facto GOP platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

If you read the article, it explained the difference between being convicted or liable in a criminal vs civil case. He was only found liable in a civil case, unfortunately that's not the same as being found guilty in a criminal case.

DP. Come on now. OJ Simpson was found not guilty in a criminal case but found guilty for the same crime in a civil case. We all know he was guilty, even though the he did not ultimately face criminal charges.

DP. No WE did not all know he was guilty and if I was on that jury I would still find him not guilty based on the evidence presented at trial. And no Trump was not found guilty in the civil trial. There is no guilt or innocence in civil trial it’s negligence or liable or not negligent or liable. Also the burdens of proof are different in the two differ t courts. Therefore it’s possible that although Trump was found to be liable by a preponderance of the evidence, the same jury could have found him not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Well, then you are not very bright. I can't help you with that. While I'm sure the 25+ accusations of sexual assault Trump has accumulated over 30+ years were not admitted into evidence, they do suggest a pattern, as do his own words of "You can grab them by the p***y. You can do anything" (also probably not admissible).

[Anonymous]

Thankfully our justice system isn't predicated on being judged by a jury of republican deplorables making excuses for rapists.

[Anonymous]

Lies are all that trump rape apologists have left. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lies are all that trump rape apologists have left. Sad.

No matter what lies deplorable apologists of trump the rapist spout, it doesn't change the fact that a jury of his peers in court found that trump is a rapist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lies are all that trump rape apologists have left. Sad.

I don't think they even know they're lies. I really believe that the faux-macho Trump has normalized grabbing women's private parts (and worse) whenever you want when you're 1) male and 2) are rich and/or powerful. The deplorables just don't think it's that bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lies are all that trump rape apologists have left. Sad.

I don't think they even know they're lies. I really believe that the faux-macho Trump has normalized grabbing women's private parts (and worse) whenever you want when you're 1) male and 2) are rich and/or powerful. The deplorables just don't think it's that bad.

That's the maga support of trump and rape culture. So attractive to millennials. LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

If you read the article, it explained the difference between being convicted or liable in a criminal vs civil case. He was only found liable in a civil case, unfortunately that's not the same as being found guilty in a criminal case.

DP. Come on now. OJ Simpson was found not guilty in a criminal case but found guilty for the same crime in a civil case. We all know he was guilty, even though the he did not ultimately face criminal charges.

I guess you don't believe in innocent until proven guilty! How sad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While he may not be legally required to register as a sex offender, he was still found by a jury of his peers to be a rapist.

The article doesn't explain why most republicans support a rapist to be the next POTUS.

If you read the article, it explained the difference between being convicted or liable in a criminal vs civil case. He was only found liable in a civil case, unfortunately that's not the same as being found guilty in a criminal case.

DP. Come on now. OJ Simpson was found not guilty in a criminal case but found guilty for the same crime in a civil case. We all know he was guilty, even though the he did not ultimately face criminal charges.

I guess you don't believe in innocent until proven guilty! How sad!

Well a jury found that trump raped E. Jean Carroll. So there is that.