Secret Service Concludes Investigation...

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Major eyeroll at all the RW armchair detectives. You already decided, from the moment you first heard about this story, that the ONLY possible explanation for the cocaine baggie was that it was brought in by HB. If the SS had announced that they had found the culprit--and it was anyone BUT HB--would you have believed them? They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Why do you even bother reading/listening to the news? You already know everything there is to know about everything.


By naming their culprit they had a chance. By not naming anyone, they actually named HB.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Resident coke head Don Jr stopped by and planted it, but not before snorting a few lines.


True. But why SS keep protecting him?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:it was probably one of their own

The no fingerprints, no DNA suggests it was purposeful by someone.


+1

Getting fingerprints is not as easy as people like to believe. I doubt they would test for DNA. How on earth would they match that to anyone?

There were no fingerprints on the bag at all and no DNA at all, either.

And if there had been DNA, they would have DNA tested the suspects and matched the DNA on the bag to them. Not just anybody in the western hemisphere.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so now people think Joe is a coke head?

Man, this guy is awesome!


What do you mean "now"? People who put him into the WH always knew he is not there. That is why he is where he is.


OK, so the thinking here is that Joe is a known coke head, has been for years, people knew and didn't care?

This is some (pause for a JoeBidenism) MALARKEY!

I buy TFG being a coke head more than Biden.

I still think it is was 1) planted for whatever crazy reason OR 2) an agent and the secret service agents are protecting one of their own.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Major eyeroll at all the RW armchair detectives. You already decided, from the moment you first heard about this story, that the ONLY possible explanation for the cocaine baggie was that it was brought in by HB. If the SS had announced that they had found the culprit--and it was anyone BUT HB--would you have believed them? They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Why do you even bother reading/listening to the news? You already know everything there is to know about everything.


By naming their culprit they had a chance. By not naming anyone, they actually named HB.


Only in the minds of crazy people like you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so now people think Joe is a coke head?

Man, this guy is awesome!


What do you mean "now"? People who put him into the WH always knew he is not there. That is why he is where he is.


OK, so the thinking here is that Joe is a known coke head, has been for years, people knew and didn't care?

This is some (pause for a JoeBidenism) MALARKEY!

I buy TFG being a coke head more than Biden.

I still think it is was 1) planted for whatever crazy reason OR 2) an agent and the secret service agents are protecting one of their own.


Agree it was planted. Why would ss protect the criminals?
Anonymous
Many fewer camera than I expect.

So secure white house!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so now people think Joe is a coke head?

Man, this guy is awesome!


What do you mean "now"? People who put him into the WH always knew he is not there. That is why he is where he is.


OK, so the thinking here is that Joe is a known coke head, has been for years, people knew and didn't care?

This is some (pause for a JoeBidenism) MALARKEY!

I buy TFG being a coke head more than Biden.

I still think it is was 1) planted for whatever crazy reason OR 2) an agent and the secret service agents are protecting one of their own.


Agree it was planted. Why would ss protect the criminals?


They wouldn’t. This is all a big Nothingburger
Anonymous
Everything Tucker said is true

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Major eyeroll at all the RW armchair detectives. You already decided, from the moment you first heard about this story, that the ONLY possible explanation for the cocaine baggie was that it was brought in by HB. If the SS had announced that they had found the culprit--and it was anyone BUT HB--would you have believed them? They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Why do you even bother reading/listening to the news? You already know everything there is to know about everything.


By naming their culprit they had a chance. By not naming anyone, they actually named HB.


By what calculus is that? Hundreds of people pass through that entrance. It wasn't "actually naming HB" - it was inability to pin down which of the hundreds it could have been.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Everything Tucker said is true



"Crazed, and grandiose" and "I know what it looks like" - and I wouldn't doubt Tucker himself was on coke up on that stage cackling like a loon.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so now people think Joe is a coke head?

Man, this guy is awesome!


What do you mean "now"? People who put him into the WH always knew he is not there. That is why he is where he is.


OK, so the thinking here is that Joe is a known coke head, has been for years, people knew and didn't care?

This is some (pause for a JoeBidenism) MALARKEY!

I buy TFG being a coke head more than Biden.

I still think it is was 1) planted for whatever crazy reason OR 2) an agent and the secret service agents are protecting one of their own.


Agree it was planted. Why would ss protect the criminals?


SS needs a house cleaning. It's still full of people who destroyed J6 evidence to protect Trump. So many problems, so little accountability.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Everything Tucker said is true



Haha. Too good
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Major eyeroll at all the RW armchair detectives. You already decided, from the moment you first heard about this story, that the ONLY possible explanation for the cocaine baggie was that it was brought in by HB. If the SS had announced that they had found the culprit--and it was anyone BUT HB--would you have believed them? They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Why do you even bother reading/listening to the news? You already know everything there is to know about everything.


By naming their culprit they had a chance. By not naming anyone, they actually named HB.


By what calculus is that? Hundreds of people pass through that entrance. It wasn't "actually naming HB" - it was inability to pin down which of the hundreds it could have been.


It is not hundreds, it maybe a hundred. They all have names and SS has the list of people who were there during a certain period of time. Even if there is no fingerprints, no DNA (which is very plausible), and no video recording (highly unlikely), it is easy to go through the list of those names, narrow it down to dozen, interview them, and search warrant if needed, and they would have a name. By not disclosing that name, they named HB.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: