Rose Hanbury and Prince William

[Anonymous]

^^ and yes, I understand it is a title rather than a position and that the County of Sussex is not part of the duke/duchess title. But still ridiculous to carry the title "of Sussx."

[Anonymous]

Huh. You never know what's going on in the private lives of public figures, but all of this is really wild speculation based on non-credible tabloid or social media allegations. So really, none of us knows anything either way.

[Anonymous]

This idea that the BRF needs Kate Middleton would be laughable if it wasn't so ridiculous . If anything , she's the one who has to make herself useful ( she fails at it ) in order to justify her presence . She's been a uterus-for-hire and the mission has been accomplished.Some of you are, unsurprisingly, vastly overestimating the extent to which modern Brits care about their monarchy .
As for William's potential affair(s), it's always good to err on the side of probability in these situations. In other words; a wealthy, famous man with endless possibilities to have multiple sexual partners is almost always going to do just that . Maybe he's an exception but as far I'm concerned and, knowing what I know, I'd say it's highly unlikely he's been devoutly monogamous.

[Anonymous]

I see Rose as a not-good-enough. Not beautiful, weak chin, hasty marriage to a man who is a) gay, and b) much older than her, pregnant before marriage. Meh. If she was good enough, she'd marry a good-looking aristocrat her age, and have children two years after the wedding, as good lord intended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see Rose as a not-good-enough. Not beautiful, weak chin, hasty marriage to a man who is a) gay, and b) much older than her, pregnant before marriage. Meh. If she was good enough, she'd marry a good-looking aristocrat her age, and have children two years after the wedding, as good lord intended.

Aristocrats aren't on every corner in the U.K, much less well-off aristocrats.

[Anonymous]

I don’t get this.

It was obvious in photos and video clips that Charles and Diana had a very strained relationship.

By contrast, William and Kate seem genuinely happy and in step with each other. Nobody can act that well if they are truly miserable.

I don’t think there was any cheating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get this.

It was obvious in photos and video clips that Charles and Diana had a very strained relationship.

By contrast, William and Kate seem genuinely happy and in step with each other. Nobody can act that well if they are truly miserable.

I don’t think there was any cheating.

That doesn’t prove there wasn’t any cheating. That proves that it’s not a deal breaker for their relationship or that the other partner doesn’t know. You don’t remember Sandra Bullock tearfully thanking her dirtbag ex yet he was cheating. She just didn’t know. Also Camilla’s husband, according to interviews his brother gave, wasn’t miserable until the affair became very public.

Also I think that many people would not agree that they seem genuinely happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see Rose as a not-good-enough. Not beautiful, weak chin, hasty marriage to a man who is a) gay, and b) much older than her, pregnant before marriage. Meh. If she was good enough, she'd marry a good-looking aristocrat her age, and have children two years after the wedding, as good lord intended.

Wasn’t she a lingerie model when she was younger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imho William and Harry saw effect of infidelity on their parents and on themselves as children and long term, they'll make conscious efforts to avoid repeating it. No?

Imho Charles saw effect of infidelity on his parents and on himself as a child and will definitely make a conscious effort to avoid repeating it. No?

Yes but his parents stayed together and lived long lives. Losing Diana at a young age, made her kids more sensitive towards her plights and blind to her flaws.

That’s a very romantic view that is contrary to basic psychology.

But also we can go back a generation beyond Charles to see that’s not what typically happens. Philips dad was also a philanderer and he also experience a lot of trauma due to his parents relationship (and in general). And still made the same decisions.

Not saying William is cheating but he’s not less likely to cheat because his parents had a bad relationship and he experienced trauma.

[Anonymous]

Can anyone explain Rose’s marriage? There seems to be a consensus that her husband is gay. He’s old enough to be her father. And somehow Rose gets knocked up in a fit of passion and they have a shotgun wedding. Or was she knocked up by William and her husband took one for the team?

It’s sounds like a bad SNL skit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain Rose’s marriage? There seems to be a consensus that her husband is gay. He’s old enough to be her father. And somehow Rose gets knocked up in a fit of passion and they have a shotgun wedding. Or was she knocked up by William and her husband took one for the team?

It’s sounds like a bad SNL skit.

Wow I didn’t realize! And last time this rumor came up, people were saying they lived in Paris most of the time - but after reading, it’s her husband who is in Paris and she’s in the UK building the brand of their estate.

[Anonymous]

Yes, I think William and Rose had an affair. I know nothing about whether he fathered her children, but I do find it peculiar that her husband is gay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see Rose as a not-good-enough. Not beautiful, weak chin, hasty marriage to a man who is a) gay, and b) much older than her, pregnant before marriage. Meh. If she was good enough, she'd marry a good-looking aristocrat her age, and have children two years after the wedding, as good lord intended.

Wasn’t she a lingerie model when she was younger?

She’s hideous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain Rose’s marriage? There seems to be a consensus that her husband is gay. He’s old enough to be her father. And somehow Rose gets knocked up in a fit of passion and they have a shotgun wedding. Or was she knocked up by William and her husband took one for the team?

It’s sounds like a bad SNL skit.

What’s there to explain? The husband is an aristocrat who’s rich AF. She has her beautiful children and is free to do as she pleases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see Rose as a not-good-enough. Not beautiful, weak chin, hasty marriage to a man who is a) gay, and b) much older than her, pregnant before marriage. Meh. If she was good enough, she'd marry a good-looking aristocrat her age, and have children two years after the wedding, as good lord intended.

Wasn’t she a lingerie model when she was younger?

She’s hideous.

She’s thin, which would have mattered more in that era.