Massive pentagon leak re Ukraine conflict

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.

Do you just sit around all day inventing fantasies that please your own biases? Don’t you have any ideas that don’t revolve around political hate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.

Cool story bro. Every Democrat I know is in support of defending Ukraine against Putin's invasion. It's only Republicans I know who side with Putin on this and who would be happy to sabotage us.

[Anonymous]

Do members of Congress and their staff get searched before entering SCIFs to view sensitive intel?

Does the protocol differ for IC agencies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do members of Congress and their staff get searched before entering SCIFs to view sensitive intel?

Does the protocol differ for IC agencies?

Well, it appears that Biden had classified information from when he was Senator. And, that was not supposed to leave the SCIF. Funny about that.

[Anonymous]

Interesting details. Bellingcat broke this story before the MSM and noticed the DoD of the leaks:

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2023/04/09/from-discord-to-4chan-the-improbable-journey-of-a-us-defence-leak/

Bellingcat spoke to members of a separate Discord community who claimed that other images had been posted earlier on yet another, since deleted, server often called “Thug Shaker Central” but which also had several other names at different times. Image files shown to Bellingcat detailed a further document in the same style and formatting of those posted in the WowMao server that was dated to January 13.

According to Vakhi, and two other users who spoke to Bellingcat but declined to be identified by their usernames, the files that were leaked onto WowMao are only the “tip of the iceberg” compared to the quantity of documents posted onto Thug Shaker Central.

There are no traces left of this server outside of testimony from these users, and scattered references to its existence on 4chan. Bellingcat is therefore unable to independently verify all of the information shared by these users, including the aforementioned January document or if the other uploader described as the source of the leak was indeed the original source.
…
However, Bellingcat was able to confirm that Vakhi and the other users who spoke to Bellingcat, as well as another who shared documents on the WowMao server, were part of the Thug Shaker server given that they shared member lists with Bellingcat which matched in key details.

Their accounts of the server’s general nature also independently coincided. The name of the Thug Shaker server frequently changed, sometimes to that of a racial slur, and had around 20 active users making up a tight-knit community, members said. Posts and channel listings show that the server’s users were interested in video games, music, Orthodox Christianity, and fandom for the popular YouTuber “Oxide”.

This server was not especially geopolitical in nature, although its users had a staunchly conservative stance on several issues, members told Bellingcat. Racial slurs and racist memes were shared widely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.

Cool story bro. Every Democrat I know is in support of defending Ukraine against Putin's invasion. It's only Republicans I know who side with Putin on this and who would be happy to sabotage us.

What are you smoking? The “Squad” urged Biden to loosen sanctions on Russia, and to negotiate a ceasefire. Not exactly a defeat Russia at all costs attitude coming from the Left:

https://www.jpost.com/international/article-720496

[Anonymous]

I bet it was Jim Jordon’s staff. Those people have a blinded hate for this country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.

Cool story bro. Every Democrat I know is in support of defending Ukraine against Putin's invasion. It's only Republicans I know who side with Putin on this and who would be happy to sabotage us.

What are you smoking? The “Squad” urged Biden to loosen sanctions on Russia, and to negotiate a ceasefire. Not exactly a defeat Russia at all costs attitude coming from the Left:

https://www.jpost.com/international/article-720496

What are YOU smoking? There are more then FIFTY Republicans who want to hand Ukraine to Putin.

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-republicans-who-have-always-voted-against-ukraine-aid-1706463

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was probably a Biden administration leak, likely from DoD or FBI, intended to distract from the Hollande interview where he says US orchestrated everything in Ukraine with intent of having a proxy war with Russia, starting with Crimea coup.

All started by some hoaxers pretending to be a Ukrainian minister.

The Hollande interview from 2013?

Search for Hollande hoax. Lots of links in search are pointing to when he was in office. I saw something from Russia Today and a random site, but the regular news sites are not covering this interview/prank.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was probably a Biden administration leak, likely from DoD or FBI, intended to distract from the Hollande interview where he says US orchestrated everything in Ukraine with intent of having a proxy war with Russia, starting with Crimea coup.

All started by some hoaxers pretending to be a Ukrainian minister.

The Hollande interview from 2013?

Search for Hollande hoax. Lots of links in search are pointing to when he was in office. I saw something from Russia Today and a random site, but the regular news sites are not covering this interview/prank.

Oh you saw it on RT. Must be legit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I saw the photographed Ukraine documents. They all appeared to have been from the same file, dated March 1, and appeared to have been hastily folded in a wad. My guess is that the documents were sneaked out of the SCIF, Sandy Bergler style and the photos were taken outside of the SCIF.

[Anonymous]

If they were posted on a gaming platform, as being reported, it has to be a young individual who did it.

[Anonymous]