Massive pentagon leak re Ukraine conflict

Anonymous
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/06/us/politics/ukraine-war-plan-russia.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

“ Classified war documents detailing secret American and NATO plans for building up the Ukrainian military ahead of a planned offensive against Russia were posted this week on social media channels, senior Biden administration officials said.

The Pentagon is investigating who may have been behind the leak of the documents, which appeared on Twitter and on Telegram, a platform with more than half a billion users that is widely available in Russia.”

“ One of the slides said 16,000 to 17,500 Russian soldiers had been killed while Ukraine had suffered as many as 71,500 troop deaths. The Pentagon and other analysts have estimated that Russia has suffered far more casualties, and that closer to 200,000 soldiers on each side had been killed or wounded.

Nonetheless, analysts said parts of the documents appeared authentic and provide Russia with valuable information such as the timetables for the delivery of weapons and troops, Ukrainian troop buildup numbers and other military details.”

“ 12 combat brigades that are being assembled, with nine of them apparently being trained and supplied by the United States and other NATO allies. Of those nine brigades, the documents said that six would be ready by March 31 and the rest by April 30. A Ukrainian brigade has about 4,000 to 5,000 soldiers, analysts said.

The document said that equipment delivery times would impact training and readiness in order to meet the timeline. Total equipment needed for nine brigades, the document said, was more than 250 tanks and more than 350 mechanized vehicles.”

Anonymous
MAGA leaks again.
Anonymous
Traitors
Anonymous
Btw the Revised casualty ratio is 1-1

Not 3-1 or 5-1 as Ukraine boosters were suggesting…

…that is disastrous for Ukraine.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Btw the Revised casualty ratio is 1-1

Not 3-1 or 5-1 as Ukraine boosters were suggesting…

…that is disastrous for Ukraine.


Fake numbers per the Pentagon. The documents have been doctored.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Btw the Revised casualty ratio is 1-1

Not 3-1 or 5-1 as Ukraine boosters were suggesting…

…that is disastrous for Ukraine.


Fake numbers per the Pentagon. The documents have been doctored.


Read the article.

The initial numbers pentagon said were fake — those showed a massive ratio in favor of Russia (obviously wrong)

The Revised numbers that people are saying are closer to truth is 200k on each side (causalities which include injured)

It is def not 3-1 or 5-1 in favor of Ukraine.

1-1 is completely unsustainable

Anonymous


Nobody believes anything coming out of this administration.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Btw the Revised casualty ratio is 1-1

Not 3-1 or 5-1 as Ukraine boosters were suggesting…

…that is disastrous for Ukraine.


uh

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Btw the Revised casualty ratio is 1-1

Not 3-1 or 5-1 as Ukraine boosters were suggesting…

…that is disastrous for Ukraine.


uh



Right

Did you read the article?

@Angry_staffer, the article and I agree the numbers in that section of the leaks are not plausible and dis info

Nyt in consultation with credible sources Revised the leaked death rate to say the ratio is closer to 1-1 (200k on each side)

Anonymous
So the NYT decides to publicize - and detail - leaks that should never have been leaked? Great job, NYT.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:MAGA leaks again.


What evidence do you have for this? We'll wait while you make something up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So the NYT decides to publicize - and detail - leaks that should never have been leaked? Great job, NYT.


The cat was way out of the bag.
NYT can suck ass, but this isn’t the reason.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So the NYT decides to publicize - and detail - leaks that should never have been leaked? Great job, NYT.


Are you saying NYT should only publish things that were intentionally leaked? I don't know what your point is?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So the NYT decides to publicize - and detail - leaks that should never have been leaked? Great job, NYT.


The cat was way out of the bag.
NYT can suck ass, but this isn’t the reason.


Americans have the right to know the facts on the ground since our generosity underpins the entire operation

Facts aren’t as rosy for little Z as much as it was purported before
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:MAGA leaks again.


What evidence do you have for this? We'll wait while you make something up.


DP what else could it be based on past actions by MAGA loyalists? Everyone knows MAGA hate this country and will do anything to support Russia. It’s posted on Twitter owned by Musk. My god why are you acting like you are a loyal American? Is it deep cover or something?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: