|
This is really all you need to know.
Note the words “may” throughout this article. The science is evolving. Personally, I drink following the guidelines and don’t spend any amount of times worrying about it. I also eat raw sushi, have gone parasailing, and take other moderate risks in life. Not everyone makes the same calculus, and some take many more risks. It is what it is. https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/moderate-drinking.htm |
No one drinks for the taste. You drink because you like the way alcohol makes you feel. |
BS. I like the taste. |
LOLwut? |
| The article says any amount of alcohol can be harmful yet doesn't seem to back that up. It just talks about moderate drinking. Are there really studies showing discernable risk from having one drink a month, one drink a year, a few sips of champagne at a wedding twenty years ago? |
I am on a crusade to stop calling our American helathcare a "system." It is most decidedly not a system. |
It is a corporation. |
It's a Group One Carcinogen, and dose responsive. There is also no safe level of smoking cigarettes, but obviously heavy smokers get lung cancer more often than casual smokers. But both are more at risk than non smokers. |
I guess if any amount is harmful that includes the small amounts found in food as well? |
| Every activity entails risk. |
That's fine. What's your point? No one is making you drink. Some people find a benefit in that it makes their food taste better. If it doesn't work for you, leave it. |
Yes, American sick care is the mightiest of all corporations. The pharmaceutical industry is as corrupted as hell. |
PP you quoted. Ok, consider me converted. Although, it is a "systemic" problem. What term(s) do you suggest? |
Wherever did you get that idea? |
Scheme, structure, arrangement, approach, apparatus? Of those I think I like scheme and approach the best. |