The poster didn’t say it was “bad.” She said she thought it was “solid but not amazing.” There’s not way that that kid with those stats was turned down by UVA especially for not having an “amazing” essay. There was something else at play. |
Again, you’re talking out your a$$. The schools that rejected this kid don’t have any concerns about yield. They’re not going to reject an applicant out of fear they won’t come. In fact they’re on the record as not taking “demonstrated interest” into account. Why do posters just make stuff up? |
It turns out that Northeastern was a very good fit for him, and came through with a very good merit aid package. So I am very happy with the way that turned out (and, more importantly, he is too). I went to Williams, so I was pretty disappointed that he didn't get in there, though the admissions rate this year was mind-boggling low. He applied to Williams and Amherst in hopes of playing hockey there. Otherwise, they were a little small for what he wanted and didn't specifically have a business major, which is what he was interested in. Not getting into UVa was stunning to me, given his profile. Nothing but green checks around him in Naviance, and historically the full IB students with good grades all got in. Obviously that changed this year. If the merit aid package from Northeastern hadn't come through, he might have gone the junior hockey route and applied again in a few years. But this is a good path for him. |
Are you saying that a student with stats as high as his and who is as good at hockey as you say he is and is a Williams Legacy wouldn’t have been accepted to Williams to play hockey? That seems so odd to me. I continue to think something is missing. Especially because of the UVA rejection. It’s mind boggling. |
NP: you are assuming that something is missing or wrong. Maybe there were other candidates that had something else the schools wanted. |
The path to college hockey is much more convoluted than for most sports. Almost all players have to go through at least 1 or 2 seasons of junior hockey before playing NCAA hockey, and many players aren't even recruited until they have already turned 20. So the Williams coach, whom my son had met, might have been interested in him, but not for at least a few more years. He simply applied Regular Decision. |
Seriously? This is cheating. It is clear that this is the student's application and should be the student's work. Pretty sly to try to justify cheating because they did not make the app cheat proof. |
There is a difference between being informed and cheating. You want to set up some hyperbolic scenario that only fits a small few to justify your cheating. Ugh. Yes, some people invest in lots of resources for their kids. We can't afford that, so I do try to stay informed to advise. But, neither advising nor enrichment equates to writing the essay. Yikes. |
Ah ok I get it. Did your son apply anywhere early decision? |
No. Early Action to UVa, VT, Northeastern, and JMU. He wasn't ready to commit to any one place that early in the process. I suspect that had he applied ED to Williams, he would have had a much better chance of getting in. |
I agree. |
Sigh. I’m going to spell it out again. My kid came up with the topic on her own (no “brainstorming” with a paid “essay consultant” or college admissions counselor) and write a full first draft. Then I looked at it, edited the absolute bejesus out of it, and she decided which edits to accept. She didn’t accept all of them. So when I said I “basically wrote it” I was being a little sarcastic. I don’t think what I did made any difference other than to make me feel better and I’m quite certain it had no impact on my - or your - kid’s college admissions. The only difference between me and many other posters is, ironically, my honesty. I am quite certain I had far less of a hand in my kids’ college applications than many of you. |
And I suspect you’re right. He would’ve gotten into UVA ED as well. |
Sigh. You've already admitted to essentially rewriting it when you say, "Editing the bejesus out of it." That is writing it. Yes, the kid started it, but you wrote it too. It is a co-authored essay. For the purposes of the application, that is cheating. |
Yield is a concern and function of admissions. Expected yield, predicted yield, or just yield is calculated into highly selective schools admissions. A concern about yield is not the same as demonstrated interest. |