Cops in TX tackle & block desperate parents, while they let shooter rampage thru the school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HOW was that one exterior door open so he could enter the school

Was the classroom door propped open

What is the story with the first SRO

So many questions

It's like 90 degrees by 1130am in that part of the country. They probably keep doors open to help with air circulation. A small rural school in TX ("low taxes! business friendly!") doesn't have the money for a badging system with magnetic locked doors.

Do you really think it's normal to keep kids boxed inside small classrooms with no fresh air all day to prevent school shootings?

That's literally the consequences of your argument.

It’s not 1850s. A/C. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: How did he get in to begin with??

He ran past armed officers .

They didnt/couldn’t stop him.

[Anonymous]

So what do these gun nutters have to say about good guys with a gun stop the bad guys with a gun? The good guys (cowardly scums) just stood there establishing a perimeter while the killer massacred the kids. This is so sickening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So unarmed parents wanted to get in there and take on this situation and all those officers with all those fancy weapons that that community bought for them, wanted to stay outside?

The expectation for law enforcement from now on must be that they have to go in and engage the shooter even if alone.

What do you mean now? That is already the current accepted guidance according to the law enforcement professional I saw interviewed yesterday..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So unarmed parents wanted to get in there and take on this situation and all those officers with all those fancy weapons that that community bought for them, wanted to stay outside?

The expectation for law enforcement from now on must be that they have to go in and engage the shooter even if alone.

That’s been the protocol since Columbine.

[Anonymous]

In the schools where I work, you cannot enter without a badge or being buzzed in after you ID yourself through an intercom/camera (after school starts). Don't all schools have this system now? At the very least, the door should have been locked and there would be time to put the school on lockdown with all classroom doors locked, lights out, etc. (as in the drills). Why didn't this happen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cops want to be militarized until it's time to go fight a guy with an AR-15. Then they stand around in fear, "establishing a perimeter." So heroic!

Fcking cowards. These ch___ are militarized to their teeth and willing to kill a Black person for fun but a White dude gunning down children? Nah, he’s cool. We’re gonna pretend he’s aN iLlEgAl though. That’ll fire up the stupids.

You are nuts! Killing black people “for fun?” And last I heard, the shooter was not a “White dude.” But, sorry that doesn’t fit your strange angry narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I’m for defunding the police. If they are going to be heartless and weak bastards who stand around while a lunatic is killing kids.

But... they established... a... perimeter. #SquadGoals #Heroic

Because I’m sure that letting scores of unarmed parents run into a building with an active shooter would have turned out super well! Are some of you really this stupid? There would have been 50 dead instead of 20, but hey, the iphone experts are never wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I’m for defunding the police. If they are going to be heartless and weak bastards who stand around while a lunatic is killing kids.

But... they established... a... perimeter. #SquadGoals #Heroic

Because I’m sure that letting scores of unarmed parents run into a building with an active shooter would have turned out super well! Are some of you really this stupid? There would have been 50 dead instead of 20, but hey, the iphone experts are never wrong.

duh. that is exactly the point. good guys with guns are useless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I’m for defunding the police. If they are going to be heartless and weak bastards who stand around while a lunatic is killing kids.

But... they established... a... perimeter. #SquadGoals #Heroic

Because I’m sure that letting scores of unarmed parents run into a building with an active shooter would have turned out super well! Are some of you really this stupid? There would have been 50 dead instead of 20, but hey, the iphone experts are never wrong.

Well, the parents wouldn't have been doing that IF THE POLICE WERE STORMING THE BUILDING. Instead, they were putting up caution tape and thinking about the OT.

Get stuffed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I’m for defunding the police. If they are going to be heartless and weak bastards who stand around while a lunatic is killing kids.

But... they established... a... perimeter. #SquadGoals #Heroic

Because I’m sure that letting scores of unarmed parents run into a building with an active shooter would have turned out super well! Are some of you really this stupid? There would have been 50 dead instead of 20, but hey, the iphone experts are never wrong.

Regardless, establishing a perimeter and waiting for backup hasn’t been protocol in decades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
In the schools where I work, you cannot enter without a badge or being buzzed in after you ID yourself through an intercom/camera (after school starts). Don't all schools have this system now? At the very least, the door should have been locked and there would be time to put the school on lockdown with all classroom doors locked, lights out, etc. (as in the drills). Why didn't this happen?

That only works in campuses with centralized building(s) and very few entrances.

Most campus out west are a number of spread out, one-story buildings where all classrooms have doors that lead outside.

So no, not all schools are the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I’m for defunding the police. If they are going to be heartless and weak bastards who stand around while a lunatic is killing kids.

But... they established... a... perimeter. #SquadGoals #Heroic

Because I’m sure that letting scores of unarmed parents run into a building with an active shooter would have turned out super well! Are some of you really this stupid? There would have been 50 dead instead of 20, but hey, the iphone experts are never wrong.

Doubt that. Shooting 9 year olds in an enclosed space is a lot easier that shooting a mob of twenty attcking you. Each and every one of those parents would have gladly exchanged their lives for those kids. Those 21 victims were sacrificied.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So unarmed parents wanted to get in there and take on this situation and all those officers with all those fancy weapons that that community bought for them, wanted to stay outside?

The expectation for law enforcement from now on must be that they have to go in and engage the shooter even if alone.

That’s been the protocol since Columbine.

Exactly. These things don’t play out like “Dog Day Afternoon” anymore, where the bad guy takes hostages and tries to get something of value. Now, as we’ve seen over and over again, the M.O. is to go in with heavy weaponry and try to kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible for no reason whatsoever.